Key Takeaways

  • Statutory damages are predetermined amounts set by law, awarded without needing to prove actual harm.
  • These damages are common in copyright, trademark, consumer protection, and civil rights cases.
  • Eligibility often depends on statutory compliance—e.g., timely copyright registration.
  • Courts may use statutory damages to deter misconduct and protect rights when actual damages are hard to calculate.
  • Limitations exist, especially in cases involving class actions or aggregated claims.

What Are Statutory Damages?

Statutory damages refer to standard payments that compensate for injuries, losses, or civil violations. These statutory damages:

  • Allow plaintiffs to vindicate their rights;
  • Quicken lawsuits since they don't need as much proof as actual damages; and
  • Offer both a punitive and compensatory resolution.

Key Characteristics of Statutory Damages

Statutory damages are typically awarded when calculating actual damages is difficult or when the law provides a specific remedy. These damages are codified in legislation, meaning the amounts are predetermined and not subject to negotiation between parties. They are available in both federal and state legal contexts and serve as a critical enforcement tool where losses are intangible or hard to quantify.

Key features include:

  • Predetermined Ranges: Laws specify minimum and maximum amounts.
  • No Requirement to Prove Actual Harm: Plaintiffs only need to demonstrate that a law was violated.
  • Punitive and Compensatory: They can both deter future violations and compensate for legal wrongs.
  • Discretionary: Courts have flexibility to decide the final amount within the statutory range.

Statutory Damages: What Are They?

Considered a sort of civil fine or punishment, statutory damages typically result from contract lawsuits. State statutes govern these damages. Therefore, the amounts and guidelines vary by state or local jurisdiction.

Cases that commonly result in statutory damages include:

  • breaches of intellectual property or copyright law,
  • public policy violations,
  • and tax evasion.

Courts can also avoid statutory damages for consumer rights violations, civil rights violations, and some lawsuits between landlords and tenants. Examples of common statutes and statutory damages include:

  • Anti-Counterfeiting Consumer Protection Act: Damages for selling or making counterfeit goods range from $1,000 to $200,000. They can go up to $2 million for willful use.
  • Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act: Damages for pirating a domain name range from $1,000 to $10,000. They can go up to $100,000 for willful piracy.
  • Cable Piracy Act: Damages for a pirating cable communications range from $1,000 to $100,000.
  • Cable Privacy Act: Damages for cable providers who violate privacy and disclosure requirements equal $100 a day per violation or $1,000.
  • Copyright Act: Statutory damages for copyright violations range from $750 to $30,000.
  • Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act: Damages for failing to comply with disclosure requirements range from $100 to $1,000. Using false pretenses to obtain a credit report can bring statutory damages of up to $1,000.
  • Fair Debt Collection Practices Act: Damages for debt collection violations are up to $1,000 per day.
  • Stored Communications Act: Damages for violating electronic privacy start at $1,000. Plaintiffs may also sue for actual damages.
  • Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Damages for certain solicitations by phone or fax equal $500 per violation.
  • Lanham Act: Damages for trademark violations, including unfair competition, infringement, and willful dilution, range from $1,000 to $250,000.
  • Truth in Lending Act: Damages for a lending violation are linked to the lender's financing charges.
  • Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act: Damages for failing to give 60 days' notice of layoffs or closings for certain businesses equal up to $500 a day for up to 60 days.

When Are Statutory Damages Typically Awarded?

Statutory damages are often awarded in cases where:

  • Proving actual damages is impractical or impossible (e.g., copyright or digital content infringement).
  • Laws are designed to create strict deterrents, such as consumer protection and data privacy statutes.
  • Public policy favors enforcement to uphold systemic rights or regulate industries like telecom or lending.

For instance, the Copyright Act allows statutory damages between $750 and $30,000 per work infringed, or up to $150,000 for willful infringement. The Lanham Act, governing trademark law, also permits statutory damages for counterfeit marks to deter infringement and protect brand integrity.

Why Are Statutory Damages Important?

To receive statutory damages, plaintiffs don't have to prove they lost a certain amount. Instead, they only have to prove the defendant has violated the law. However, the judge may decide to award damages that reach only what the two parties anticipated when they made the agreement.

In addition, statutory damages differ from compensatory or actual damages, which aim to reimburse one party for a breach or a violation of the law. To receive actual damages, the plaintiff must give proof of lost revenue.

The amount a plaintiff receives in statutory damages can be larger than the real financial loss. A judge may opt for statutory damages that give the defendant a bigger financial penalty if the actual damages seem to be small.

In most cases, statutes don't offer guidance for deciding on an amount within a range of damages. This can cause disproportionate awards and due process concerns, as the following examples illustrate:

  • St. Louis, I.M. & S. Ry. Co. V. Williams: The court awarded $75 in statutory damages for instances of harm worth 66 cents each. After considering the interest of the public and the scale of the offense, the court determined the award reasonable.
  • BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore: The court awarded both $4 million in statutory damages and $4,000 in actual damages. Later, the court reduced the statutory damages to $2 million. It claimed the jury had multiplied the base amount by nationwide figures rather than local figures. This case was not considered exceptional since the defendant was found to have committed economic harm but not physical harm.
  • State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell: The court awarded both $145 million in statutory damages and $1 million in actual damages. The court later reduced the amount, claiming the case should only consider the defendant's actions against the plaintiff.
  • Philip Morris USA v. Williams: The court awarded both $79.5 million in statutory damages and $821,000 in actual damages. However, the court later reduced it to a less excessive amount. It claimed that due process prevented the court from punishing a defendant for harming nonparties.
  • Sony BMG Music Entm't v. Tenenbaum: The court awarded the plaintiff a total of $675,000 in statutory damages, or $22,500 a song. After labeling the damages excessive, the court reduced the award to $2,500 per song, or $67,500 total.
  • Capitol Records v. Thomas-Rasset: The court awarded $1.92 million in statutory damages. Several appeals later, the court reduced the award to $1 million, or $62,000 per song.
  • Arista Records LLC v. LimeWire LLC: The court rejected calculated statutory damages that totaled $1.4 billion for 11,000 songs, citing an excessive award. Eventually, the parties settled for $105 million.
  • Bateman v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.: The court originally rejected class certification but eventually reversed its decision, despite damages between $29 and $290 million.

Eligibility for Statutory Damages

To qualify for statutory damages, plaintiffs must meet certain conditions:

  • Legal Standing: The plaintiff must be directly affected or have a recognized legal right.
  • Timely Action: For example, in copyright cases, the work must be registered before infringement or within three months of publication.
  • Scope of Violation: Damages may vary depending on whether the infringement was willful or innocent.
  • Jurisdiction: The availability and limits of statutory damages vary between federal and state laws.

Statutory damages are particularly attractive when defendants have hidden assets or when actual harm is diffuse and hard to trace, such as in mass online infringements.

Common Mistakes

  • Pursuing actual damages instead of statutory damages. Plaintiffs can pursue either statutory or actual damages. Since statutory damages are easier to obtain and may be higher, many plaintiffs prefer them.
  • Neglecting to register a copyright. To pursue statutory damages for copyright violation, the plaintiff must have registered the copyright within three months of publication or before the violation happens. If you don't do this, you may only be able to pursue actual damages. Courts usually deny infringement claims for violations that start before copyright registration and continue afterward.
  • Failing to understand how aggregation of parties can affect statutory damages. Many statutes predate the internet and don't take its scope into effect. As a result, some cases have resulted in extensive statutory damages to compensate for hundreds or thousands of infringers. Aggregation of parties can also affect lawsuits that may result in statutory damages. If the total amount of damages is unreasonably high, such as in Ratner v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co., Leysoto v. Mama Mia I, and Parker v. Time Warner Entm't Co., many courts have denied class certification for cases.
  • Failing to understand how aggregation of claims can affect statutory damages. In some copyright cases, aggregation of claims has become a big issue, especially in the case of infringers who freely copy content online. For instance, in L.A. Times, Inc. v. Free Republic, the plaintiffs received a $1 million award for illegal use of copyrighted content online. In Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. Alyson Reeves, the plaintiff received over $85 million after the defendant's website allowed free access to the video game World of Warcraft. In UMG Recordings, Inc. v. MP3.com, the plaintiff received over $53 million for file-sharing infringements.

Limits and Challenges of Statutory Damages

While statutory damages offer strong protections, there are limitations:

  • Constitutional Scrutiny: Excessive statutory awards may face due process challenges, especially if disproportionate to the harm (e.g., BMW v. Gore).
  • Cap on Damages: Courts often cap excessive awards to prevent windfalls and ensure fairness.
  • Ineligibility Without Registration: Especially in copyright law, failure to register timely can nullify the right to statutory damages.
  • Aggregate Actions: Courts may hesitate to certify class actions if aggregated statutory damages seem excessive or unmanageable.

These limitations underscore the importance of understanding both the benefits and boundaries of statutory remedies.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are statutory damages in simple terms?
    Statutory damages are fixed amounts set by law to compensate for violations, awarded without needing to prove actual financial loss.
  2. In which types of cases are statutory damages most common?
    They are most common in copyright, trademark, consumer protection, and civil rights cases.
  3. Can I receive statutory damages if I didn’t register my copyright?
    Generally, no. For copyright violations, you must register your work before infringement or within three months of publication.
  4. How are statutory damages different from punitive damages?
    Statutory damages are set by law and often awarded automatically, while punitive damages are awarded to punish egregious behavior and require proof of willful misconduct.
  5. Can statutory damages be reduced by a court?
    Yes. Courts can reduce excessive statutory damages, especially if they violate constitutional protections or due process principles.

If you need help with statutory damages, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.