Key Takeaways

  • A liquidation agreement (also called a liquidating agreement) allows parties to settle claims without litigation by establishing liability, damages, and recovery rights.
  • Unlike penalties, liquidated damages in contracts must be a reasonable forecast of actual loss to remain enforceable.
  • These agreements are widely used in construction contracts, often between contractors, subcontractors, and project owners, to pass claims through one party.
  • Courts uphold liquidation agreements when they contain three essential elements: liability flow-down, a promise to pay recovered sums, and a good-faith prosecution of claims.
  • Common risks include waiver of independent claims, overbroad releases, and disputes over allocation of recovery.
  • Parties should carefully negotiate scope, timing, and cooperation obligations before signing a liquidation agreement.

Contract liquidation minutes or the liquidated damages clause is the provision to pay a predetermined amount of damages if a party breaches a contract.

When one of the parties in a contract fails to perform its part, it amounts to a breach of contract. The non-breaching party is usually entitled to claim damages for the breach. The traditional approach is to sue for actual damages caused by the breach.

Liquidated Damages Clause

Contract law and recoverable damages vary with the state. For instance, in Georgia, you can recover damages that arise naturally and in the normal course of things contemplated by the parties at the time of entering into the contract, as the likely result of the breach. In other words, the suing party must establish the actual damages.

For example, if an event planner cancels a meeting promised to an hotelier, the actual economic impact of such cancellation on the hotel must be computed. The plaintiff must first assign a monetary value to the damage caused by the breach. This can get complicated since neither party actually knows the financial consequences of a breach until the breach actually takes place. Hence, liquidated damages clause is commonly used in meeting industry contracts.

Liquidated damages are the consequences of breach, predetermined by the contracting parties at the time of forming the contract. The liquidated damages clause gives an opportunity to the parties to identify and agree to fair and reasonable damages for breach of a contract, rather than arguing over the actual amount of damages after the breach occurs.

Most of the meeting contracts nowadays include a liquidated damages clause. This helps the parties avoid unnecessary litigation over computation of damages at a later stage.

Unless deemed to be unenforceable, the liquidation damages clause is binding on all the parties.

Understanding Liquidation Agreements

A liquidation agreement is a contract mechanism often used to streamline how claims are resolved, especially in industries like construction. In this arrangement, a subcontractor agrees to let the general contractor pursue claims against the project owner on its behalf. The agreement typically states that:

  • The general contractor acknowledges liability to the subcontractor, but only to the extent that the owner is liable to the general contractor.
  • The general contractor promises to pass through to the subcontractor any amounts recovered from the owner.
  • The general contractor commits to pursuing the owner’s liability in good faith.

This structure helps avoid multiple lawsuits and conflicting judgments. For example, instead of both the contractor and subcontractor suing the project owner separately, a single claim is advanced, reducing litigation costs and streamlining recovery.

Liquidation Damages vs. Penalty

You should draft the liquidated damages clause in such a manner that it does not amount to penalty. A payment can take the form of a penalty if the breaching party is required to pay more than the likely damages arising from the breach.

Breach of contract should, in a way, offer a choice to the parties. If a party does not want to perform its part, it shouldn't be compelled to. If the non-breaching party is compensated in a manner that it ends up being in the same financial position as it would be in if the contract had been performed without any breach, there shouldn't be any problem. However, if a contract requires a party to pay 200 percent of likely damages resulting from the breach, it would amount to a penalty.

When the damages arising from a breach of contract can be measured with reasonable certainty or when the agreed amount of compensation blatantly exceeds the amount of actual damages, courts usually consider such agreements as being in the nature of an unenforceable penalty.

Agreeing to a liquidated damages clause does not prevent the parties from litigating their validity at a later point in time. The party questioning the liquidated damages clause must either prove that the damages arising from the breach can be accurately measured or that the agreed damages are blatantly in excess of the actual damages. On proving either of these elements, courts treat the liquidated damages clause as an unenforceable penalty.

Essential Elements of a Valid Liquidation Agreement

For courts to enforce a liquidation agreement, three core elements are generally required:

  1. Acknowledgment of Liability: The contractor must accept liability to the subcontractor to the extent the owner is liable.
  2. Promise to Pay: The contractor agrees to pay the subcontractor its share of any sums actually recovered from the owner.
  3. Good-Faith Prosecution: The contractor must diligently and fairly pursue the subcontractor’s claim against the owner.

If these elements are present, most courts uphold liquidation agreements. Without them, the arrangement may be deemed unenforceable.

Liquidation Damages Clause and Mitigation

Generally, the victim of a breach has a legal obligation to mitigate the damages caused by a breach. In the context of meetings, the hotel or the facility is expected to take reasonable steps to resell the meeting space. However, if the contract includes a liquidation damages clause, no such duty exists to mitigate the damages and hence, the facility need not make any efforts to resell the space.

Risks and Challenges in Liquidation Agreements

While liquidation agreements offer efficiency, they are not without risks:

  • Waiver of Claims: Subcontractors may waive independent rights if the contractor fails to properly prosecute the claim.
  • Overbroad Releases: Poorly drafted agreements can release claims unrelated to the project at hand.
  • Allocation Disputes: When multiple subcontractors are involved, disputes may arise over how recovered sums are divided.
  • Owner Defenses: Owners may challenge the pass-through nature of the claims, delaying resolution.

To minimize risk, parties should clearly define the scope of claims, recovery allocation, and cooperation obligations before signing. Independent legal advice is strongly recommended.

When Is a Liquidated Damages Clause Allowed?

Liquidated damages are allowed only in the following situations:

  • The loss or damage arising from a breach of contract is uncertain.
  • Considering the anticipated harm, the amount of liquidated damages is fair and reasonable.
  • It's difficult to prove the amount of loss or damages.
  • No other remedy is available to cover the damages.
  • The damages are intended to serve as a protection against the breach, rather than as a penalty for the breach.

Courts do not allow liquidated damages clauses in the following situations:

  • The agreed damages are for an amount extremely disproportionate to the loss.
  • The agreed damages are intended to punish the breaching party.
  • The breach is just a delay in payment.
  • The amount of damages can be easily estimated.

Practical Uses in Construction and Beyond

Liquidation agreements are particularly useful in construction projects involving multiple tiers of contractors and subcontractors. They allow claims to be “passed through” to the project owner rather than creating fragmented disputes. Outside construction, liquidation agreements can also help businesses in joint ventures or partnerships resolve liability in a unified way.

Ultimately, these agreements promote efficiency by ensuring only one lawsuit is filed instead of several, conserving judicial resources and reducing costs for all parties.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is a liquidation agreement in construction?
    It is an arrangement where a contractor pursues an owner for claims on behalf of subcontractors and agrees to pass recovered sums back to them.
  2. Are liquidation agreements enforceable in court?
    Yes, if they include liability flow-down, a promise to pay recovered sums, and a good-faith obligation to prosecute claims.
  3. How do liquidation agreements differ from liquidated damages?
    Liquidation agreements resolve claims collectively, while liquidated damages are predetermined sums payable for breach of contract.
  4. What risks should subcontractors watch out for?
    They should be cautious of broad release clauses, loss of independent claims, and unclear terms on recovery allocation.
  5. Can liquidation agreements be used outside of construction?
    Yes. They can also be useful in joint ventures, partnerships, or other multi-party business contracts where claims may overlap.

If you need help with contract liquidation minutes, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.