Key Takeaways

  • Mutuality of contracts requires all parties to agree to and be bound by the same terms.
  • It is a foundational principle tied to the concept of consideration in contract law.
  • Courts will not enforce contracts lacking mutual obligations unless specific exceptions apply.
  • Unilateral contracts are valid without mutuality because only one party makes a binding promise.
  • Situations involving illusory promises, discretionary clauses, or lack of specificity can undermine mutuality.
  • Legal doctrines and equitable remedies may be used to uphold or void contracts lacking mutual obligations.

Mutuality of obligation in contracts refers to the requirement that all parties involved in a contract agree to the same terms.

What Is Mutuality of Obligation?

Also referred to as a "meeting of the minds," mutuality of obligation requires that everyone signing a contract agree to the specifics outlined in its terms. Demonstration of mutuality of obligation happens when one party makes an offer and the other party accepts that offer. 

Mutuality of obligation is closely related to the idea of consideration. Under the rule of consideration, both parties in a contractual agreement must perform the obligations outlined. If either party fails to meet its obligations, the law treats the agreement as invalid, which means neither party must perform the duties. 

When someone making an offer and someone accepting an offer each make promises to handle certain obligations, neither can have the unlimited option to void the contract. When this option is available, one party tends to perform the obligations at their leisure, without any changes to the other party's obligations to perform their duties. 

How Courts Evaluate Mutuality of Contracts

Courts assess mutuality by determining whether each party is legally bound to perform under the contract. If a contract allows one party to unilaterally cancel or modify obligations without consequences, courts may view the agreement as lacking enforceable mutuality.

Factors considered by courts include:

  • Definiteness of Terms: Vague or discretionary obligations can indicate lack of enforceability.
  • Performance Obligations: Both sides must be obligated to do something specific.
  • Escape Clauses: Clauses that give one party the right to cancel at will are red flags unless tied to objective criteria (e.g., force majeure).

For example, a promise that is conditioned solely on the promisor’s satisfaction (e.g., “if I feel like it”) may be viewed as an illusory promise, lacking enforceable mutuality.

Legal Ramifications of Mutuality of Obligation 

In a court, a contract with an option to fail to perform the listed obligations will typically be voided due to lack of mutuality of obligation. The lack of consideration to both parties is another reason that this type of contract would be voided. If one party has the power to cancel or void a contract, no legal repercussions exist for failing to deliver on the promises made. 

When drafting and signing a contract, all involved parties must limit the discretion to not perform on the agreed-upon terms or cancel the contract to prevent it from being invalidated. A court will typically find the existence of mutuality of obligation when the terms to cancel the contract depend on an event or condition outside the control of the party seeking to cancel.

For example, if a farmer has a contract with a third-party watering service, he might have a legal right to cancel one instance of that service if the contract included conditions based on rainfall in the area. Since the amount of rainfall is outside the control of the farmer, including this reason to cancel could still be considered mutuality of obligation. However, if the contract outlined the farmer's right to cancel service for any reason before the term of the contract was up, this would not be considered mutuality of obligation. 

When two parties sign a contract, this action represents a mutual obligation to one another. Without the obligation, a court will not consider a contract to be a legally binding agreement. However, there are several exceptions to the requirement for mutuality. 

Illusory Promises and Lack of Mutuality

An illusory promise occurs when one party's commitment is so indefinite that it imposes no real obligation. While a contract might appear mutual on the surface, it may not be legally binding if one party has unfettered discretion to perform or withdraw.

Examples of illusory promises include:

  • “I will buy your product if I decide to.”
  • “I will continue this agreement unless I no longer want to.”

In such cases, there's no mutuality because only one party is genuinely bound. To ensure enforceability, courts often require that obligations are clearly delineated and not subject to arbitrary revocation.

Exceptions to the Mutuality Rule: Unilateral Contracts 

The requirement of mutuality of obligation only exists on bilateral contracts, or contracts that involve two or more parties making promises to one another. When a contract is unilateral or outlines a promise in exchange for an act, mutuality is not required. 

In one example, John promises a payment of $30 to Bryan in exchange for mowing the lawn. When John makes this promise to Bryan, he makes it clear that the payment of $30 is in exchange for the act of mowing the lawn, not just a promise to mow the grass. This example of a unilateral contract binds both parties, but they are not making a promise in exchange for another promise. Only John is bound by the agreement because he is the only one making a promise.

If Bryan chooses not to mow the lawn, he will not receive the $30. Bryan isn't bound by the agreement because it is up to him whether he wants to mow the lawn or not. However, John is bound to pay the $30 if Bryan fulfills his end of the agreement by mowing the lawn. Since this is a unilateral contract example, mutuality of obligation doesn't have to exist. However, it can still be a legally binding contract, so if Bryan does mow the lawn and John doesn't pay him, Bryan could take legal action.

The main difference between an illusory promise and a unilateral contract is the legal binding between the parties. If a bilateral contract contains an illusory promise, only one party is bound while the other party made a promise that isn't binding. 

Equitable Doctrines Supporting Contract Enforcement

In some cases, courts apply equitable doctrines to uphold contracts that lack clear mutuality. These include:

  • Promissory Estoppel: If one party reasonably relies on another’s promise to their detriment, the court may enforce the promise despite the lack of mutuality.
  • Implied Contracts: Conduct and communications between parties can create implied obligations, making the contract enforceable.
  • Quantum Meruit: When services are rendered under a non-binding agreement, courts may grant compensation based on the value of work performed.

These doctrines prevent unjust enrichment and promote fairness, even when formal mutuality of contracts is absent.

Situations Where Mutuality Is Presumed

Even when a contract does not explicitly state reciprocal obligations, mutuality may be implied by context or industry norms. Courts may presume mutuality in the following situations:

  • Contracts for Sale of Goods: Under the UCC, good faith and fair dealing can imply mutual obligations in commercial contracts.
  • Employment Agreements: Although often at-will, certain employment contracts imply obligations like notice periods or non-compete enforcement.
  • Ongoing Service Contracts: Even if one party reserves some discretion, if performance is regularly delivered and accepted, mutuality may be inferred.

These examples demonstrate how courts can uphold contracts despite a facial appearance of unequal obligations.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is mutuality of contracts in simple terms? It means both parties in a contract must be bound to perform their respective obligations for the agreement to be enforceable.

2. Can a contract be valid without mutuality? Yes, unilateral contracts or agreements enforced under promissory estoppel or implied contract doctrines can still be valid.

3. What is an example of a lack of mutuality? A contract allowing one party to cancel at any time without penalty or providing anything in return would typically lack mutuality.

4. How does mutuality differ in unilateral vs. bilateral contracts? Bilateral contracts require both parties to make promises. In unilateral contracts, only one party makes a promise, which becomes binding when the other party performs.

5. What happens if mutuality is missing in a contract? If a contract lacks mutual obligations, it may be declared unenforceable by a court unless an exception or equitable principle applies.

If you need help with mutuality of obligation in contracts, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.