Key Takeaways:

  • Contracts are legally binding agreements between two or more parties that require specific elements such as offer, consideration, acceptance, and mutuality.
  • The Benefit-Detriment Theory defines consideration as either a benefit to the promisor or a detriment to the promisee, distinguishing it from the Bargain Theory.
  • Hammer v. Sidway is a landmark case illustrating the Benefit-Detriment Theory, showing how forbearance (refraining from an action) can constitute valid consideration.
  • Different types of contracts include express, implied, unilateral, and bilateral agreements, each with distinct legal implications.
  • Statutes such as the Statute of Frauds require specific contracts, such as real estate agreements, to be in writing for enforceability.
  • Oral contracts may still be enforceable, though their enforceability varies by jurisdiction and is subject to different statutes of limitations.

Understanding the law of contracts is important when drafting a legally binding document. A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that is enforceable by law. It assumes a legal obligation must be met.

Everything You Need to Know About Contracts

Many aspects of life involve legal contracts, such as applying for an auto loan, buying a house, agreeing to a computer software's terms and conditions, and signing employment-related paperwork. A contract is essentially a promise recognized by law that can be enforced.

Contract law falls under a state's common law. As such, court interpretations might vary between states. Contracts are needed when one of the parties involved makes a promise. To be legally binding, the contract must involve some sort of promise or agreement.

There are two definitions or theories regarding contracts and adequate consideration: the benefit-detriment theory and the bargain theory.

  • Benefit-Detriment Theory of Consideration
    • In this scenario, the contract either benefits of the promisor or is to the detriment of the promisee
    • For example, gift promises are not enforceable because the promisor might gain personal satisfaction from the act, so there isn't sufficient detriment to constitute adequate consideration
  • Bargain Theory of Consideration (also known as Bargain-for-Exchange Theory)
    • Adequate consideration exists only when an individual makes a promise in return for something
    • The condition is that the person making the promise was given something in exchange for making that promise

Essentially, the difference between the bargain-for-exchange theory and the detriment-benefit theory is each party's motive for making the agreement. Bargain theory involves subjective mutual assent (two parties agree on something), while the detriment-benefit theory involves objective legal detriment (the promisee loses something to the promisor).

In cases where the intention isn't clear, a court examines any usage or custom that might determine the agreement's intention. With an oral contract, a court might consider both parties' intentions that led to the contract's formation.

There is no legal requirement for a contract to be in writing, although certain statutes require certain types of agreements to be in writing. New Mexico, for instance, enforces oral contracts in situations where the Statute of Frauds (which requires that certain contracts be in writing and signed) does not.

Keep in mind that oral and written contracts have different statutes of limitations. For written contracts, the general statute is six years, while for oral contracts it's four years. If a written contract involves a sale of goods, however, the statute of limitations is four years unless the contract specifies a shorter period, which can be no less than one year.

Most contracts are written and signed by the parties involved. While most contracts are enforceable, those that only serve as a way to determine a party's obligation are not.

The Importance of Consideration in Contract Law

Consideration is a fundamental requirement in contract law, ensuring that each party offers something of value in exchange for a promise. Without it, a contract may not be legally enforceable. The law recognizes two main theories of consideration:

  1. Benefit-Detriment Theory – Under this theory, consideration exists if the contract benefits the promisor or imposes a detriment on the promisee.
  2. Bargain Theory – Consideration requires a reciprocal exchange where both parties negotiate and agree on the terms.

While both theories establish enforceability, courts may interpret them differently depending on the jurisdiction and the specific contract in question.

Elements of a Contract

Every contract must contain a few basic elements to be considered legally binding.

  • Offer — one of the parties involved makes a promise to do or not do something
  • Consideration — a party promised something of value in exchange for the specified action or nonaction
    • Consideration is defined as the value that motivates the parties to enter into a contract, and it distinguishes the contract agreement from a gift
    • Unlike promises made in a contract, failing to follow through on a promise made with a gift is not enforceable by law because it isn't considered a breach of contract
    • Consideration can take the form of effort or money expenditures, a promise to perform a service, a reliance on a promise, or an agreement not to perform an action
  • Acceptance — the offer was clearly accepted
    • The contract can be accepted verbally or through performance or deeds called for in the agreement
    • This acceptance must mirror the offer terms; otherwise, it's viewed as a counteroffer or rejection
    • In cases where a contract involves a sale of goods between merchants, the acceptance doesn't need to mirror the terms to be valid
  • Mutuality — all contracting parties must mutually agree to the contract
    • Each party involved in the contract must understand and agree to the agreement's basic terms and substance

Hammer v. Sidway and the Benefit-Detriment Theory

A key case that illustrates the Benefit-Detriment Theory is Hammer v. Sidway (1891). In this case, an uncle promised his nephew $5,000 if he refrained from drinking, smoking, gambling, and swearing until age 21. The court ruled that the nephew's forbearance (giving up legal rights) constituted sufficient consideration, reinforcing that detriment suffered by the promisee can validate a contract.

This case is significant because it expanded the traditional understanding of what constitutes consideration. It demonstrated that a promise does not have to involve an exchange of money or tangible goods—a party giving up a legal right can be enough.

Types of Contracts

Contracts can take the following forms:

  • Express contract — the most common type of contract, in which all elements are clearly stated
  • Implied in-fact contract — no expressed terms exist

Regardless of the contract type, legal issues arise when one of the parties involved in the contract fails to perform their legal obligation.

Unilateral vs. Bilateral Contracts

Contracts generally fall into two broad categories:

  1. Unilateral Contracts – One party makes a promise in exchange for an act. The contract is formed only when the act is performed. (Example: A company offers a reward for finding lost property.)
  2. Bilateral Contracts – Both parties exchange promises, forming an enforceable agreement immediately. (Example: A contract where one party agrees to deliver goods, and the other agrees to pay.)

Understanding the distinction is crucial, as legal obligations differ depending on the type of contract. Courts often evaluate these contracts based on the specific circumstances of the agreement and the expectations of both parties.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the Benefit-Detriment Theory in contract law?
    The Benefit-Detriment Theory states that consideration exists if one party benefits from a contract while the other party suffers a detriment, such as giving up a legal right.
  2. Why was Hammer v. Sidway important for contract law?
    It established that forbearance (refraining from an action) can be valid consideration, reinforcing that contracts don’t require a direct exchange of goods or money.
  3. What is the difference between unilateral and bilateral contracts?
    A unilateral contract requires performance to be completed before it becomes binding, while a bilateral contract involves an immediate exchange of promises.
  4. Are oral contracts legally binding?
    Yes, oral contracts can be legally binding, but they may be harder to enforce. Some contracts, like real estate agreements, must be in writing under the Statute of Frauds.
  5. How can I ensure my contract is legally enforceable?
    To ensure enforceability, contracts should include clear terms, valid consideration, mutual assent, and compliance with any statutory requirements, such as written documentation when necessary.

If you need legal help understanding the law of contracts, post your job on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.