Key Takeaways

  • A covenant agreement contract is a legally binding promise, often used in finance, real estate, and employment, to ensure certain actions are performed or avoided.
  • Covenants may be affirmative (requiring action) or negative (restricting actions), and violations can trigger remedies such as damages or contract termination.
  • Covenant consent is essential, requiring mutual agreement and enforceability based on law and public policy.
  • These agreements are widely used in employment, land use, business sales, and financial lending, often tied to restrictive covenants like non-compete, non-solicitation, or confidentiality clauses.
  • Enforcement challenges vary by state, as some jurisdictions limit non-competes or other restrictive covenants.
  • Assignability, reasonableness of restrictions, and clarity of terms are critical for enforceability.
  • Common mistakes include vague drafting, overbroad restrictions, and failure to comply with local laws.

What Is a Covenant Agreement Contract?

A covenant agreement contract is a written promise in an indenture or other formal debt agreement. It's between individuals who have promised to do or not do certain activities.

In finance, covenant agreements relate to financial contracts. These include loan documents that outline borrower limits. These limits protect lenders from defaulted borrowers and make up the covenant agreement contract.

Covenant agreements are also known as restrictive covenants or restrictive agreements. They're often used in real estate and commercial land use situations. For example, to avoid competition, someone buying a commercial property might be restricted from soliciting employees from the previous business.

Covenant agreements can cover everything from maintaining employees to the smallest dividend payments. They're most often represented as financial ratios that need maintenance. One example of this is debt-to-asset ratios. Even employment contracts come with restrictive agreements.

Aside from "covenant agreements," there are also affirmative covenants and negative covenants.

Affirmative (or positive) covenants are contract clauses that require the borrower to complete certain actions, such as getting insurance. Complying with the law, providing financial audits to the lender, and maintaining a good credit rating are other examples. When a borrower violates an affirmative covenant, he or she defaults and the lender can demand payment in full. In certain situations, borrowers have a grace period to fix any violations.

Negative covenants require borrowers to avoid certain activities that might lower their credit standing and ability to repay debts. Financial ratios are a good example of negative covenants. Most lenders look at a borrower's total debt against his or her earnings. If the debt-to-income ratio is too high, the lender will refuse the loan.

Another example of a negative covenant is the interest coverage ratio. According to this, earnings before taxes and interest must be higher than interest payments by so much. As such, this ratio keeps a borrower in check to make sure he or she has enough earnings to pay the loan's interest.

Types of Restrictive Covenants

Restrictive covenants come in several forms, each serving a unique business or legal purpose:

  • Non-compete covenants: Prevent a party from starting or joining a competing business within a specified time or geographic area.
  • Non-solicitation covenants: Restrict former employees or business owners from soliciting customers, clients, or employees after leaving.
  • Confidentiality covenants: Require parties to keep sensitive information private and not use it for unauthorized purposes.
  • Non-disparagement covenants: Prohibit negative statements about the business or its leadership, commonly used in settlement agreements.
  • Intellectual property covenants: Ensure inventions, trade secrets, or proprietary materials created during employment remain with the company.

These restrictive covenants are enforceable only when narrowly tailored to protect legitimate business interests without imposing unreasonable burdens.

Why Is a Covenant Agreement Contract Important?

In practice, a covenant agreement contract is a form of "action ex contractu." This is a legal action resulting from a breach of contract. Covenants work to protect all parties involved in the contract, ensuring that each will hold up their end of the bargain. If they fail to do so, the other party will receive compensation or recover damages.

Legal dictionaries spell out the importance of "performance" and "non-performance." In other words, covenants almost always boil down to a party performing or avoiding certain actions in the best interest of the other party.

Covenants are also either dependent and concurrent or mutual and independent. Dependent agreements rely on a prior performance condition. Until the first party meets that condition, the second party isn't liable to keep up his end of the covenant.

According to legal history, there's also a difference between a "covenant real" and a "personal covenant." A covenant real is a formal agreement by which an individual might bind himself to a real thing, such as real estate. A personal covenant, however, binds an individual to personal representatives in respect to his assets and may also be something an individual must perform in person.

Personal covenants can also be transitive or intransitive. Transitive covenants are when the duty to perform the covenants passes to the party's representatives. Intransitive is when the party has limited these actions to himself, such as teaching an apprentice.

All parties perform mutual covenants at the same time. If one party has fulfilled his end of the bargain but the other hasn't, the one who is ready has the right to take action against the other party's default. No matter the type of covenant, these agreements protect individuals and companies entering contracts so they can recover damages following a breach.

The Role of Covenant Consent

For a covenant agreement to be valid, covenant consent is essential. Consent ensures both parties mutually understand and agree to the obligations being created. Courts often examine:

  • Clarity of terms: Ambiguous language can render a covenant unenforceable.
  • Fairness of restrictions: Courts balance protecting business interests against an individual’s right to work.
  • Public policy: Agreements that overly restrict trade, mobility, or lawful activities may be invalid.
  • Mutual benefit: Each party must gain something of value for the covenant to be binding.

In the absence of covenant consent, contracts risk being struck down as unfair, overly restrictive, or invalid under state law.

Reasons to Consider Not Using a Covenant Agreement Contract

Enforcement is the main problem with covenant agreements. While you may stipulate the other party can't compete against yours, this doesn't always prevent someone from stealing a trade secret and using it to their advantage. If this happens, you could end up going through a costly legal process to recover damages, and those trade secrets are still out for good.

Certain states, including California, have struck down non-compete agreements that have aimed to restrict competition. By contrast, Georgia has recently implemented new statutes that give employers more leeway to make broader non-compete agreements. Be sure to consult with a lawyer familiar with your state laws before including certain restrictive covenants.

Non-Compete Agreements

Non-compete agreements are used in two conditions:

  • Employment situations where an employer wants to restrict an employee from quitting and starting a competitor business next door. Non-competes typically restrict employees from working in similar businesses within a set timeframe, such as one or two years. The non-compete agreement might also stipulate a defined radius from the original business in which an employee may not work after leaving. Non-compete agreements, however, are hard to enforce and can even restrain trade. Some states do enforce them if a business has sustained a loss of income.
  • Business sales agreements where the old owner agrees not to compete with the new owner for a set time, area, and type of business. In this case, the seller receives compensation for the non-compete agreement.

State Variations in Enforceability

Non-compete covenants are highly state-specific. For example:

  • California: Broadly prohibits non-competes as restraints on trade, except in limited cases such as business sales.
  • Florida and Texas: Allow non-competes if restrictions are reasonable in scope, duration, and geography.
  • Illinois and Massachusetts: Recently enacted laws requiring additional employee protections, such as “garden leave” pay or notice requirements.

Because enforcement varies, businesses must tailor agreements to comply with local statutes and court precedents.

Reasons to Consider Using a Covenant Agreement Contract

Fundamentals for using a covenant agreement help solidify a contract and protect everyone involved. These include:

  • Proper parties.
  • Words of agreement.
  • A legal purpose.
  • A proper form.

In a covenant agreement contract, the parties must legally be able to enter it. If they aren't mentally capable of doing so, not of legal age, or are under duress, they can't bind themselves in a contract.

As for words of agreement, parties must give mutual consent on what is being signed. Otherwise, the contract would be unfair and incomplete. When agreement isn't given, the contract is void.

Any covenants that go against the law or public policy are also void. For example, a business person entering a covenant stating that he will not follow his occupation would be null and void because it goes against public policy. However, a covenant can state that he can't conduct business in a certain place, such as one that might interfere with the other party's business.

Covenants must be formed by deed or under seal. No particular words are necessary, but the covenant must detail the parties' intentions in respect to the contract's subject matter.

When an action initiates damage recovery following a breach of contract, it's known as a "remedy." Remedies must consider the subject with reference to:

  • The type of obligation or claim maintaining the action.
  • The declaration form.
  • The plea.
  • The judgment.

To support a remedy, there must be a breach of contract. Breaking a promise to do something or avoiding an activity as laid out in a covenant is sufficient proof, but the declaration must show the contract was under seal. Judgments following a contract breach will help parties reclaim damages. It's always best to spell out your agreements under contract to protect yourself from a breach.

Assignability and Business Transactions

One overlooked issue is whether covenant agreements are assignable in mergers or acquisitions. If employment contracts containing restrictive covenants are not assignable, a buyer may not inherit the right to enforce them after purchasing a business. This could leave key employees free to compete immediately after a transaction.

To avoid this problem, contracts should include assignability clauses, making clear that covenants transfer automatically to successors or assigns. Otherwise, valuable protections may be lost, creating unexpected risk for the acquiring party.

Covenant Agreement Contracts Versus Representations Versus Warranties

Words like "covenants," "warranties," and "representations" are so common in legal contracts that most people overlook them. Each word may sound similar, but they have distinct meanings that help fix violations, false representation, and contract breaches. Before signing any contract, familiarize yourself with this vocabulary to boost your understanding.

In the traditional sense, representations come before a contract. They're statements that one party makes to the other party before signing the contract. For instance, a business person selling a product might represent the fact that they haven't received a patent infringement.

Including representations in a contract means they function as conditions or warranties. For example, a lawyer hired under a contract agreement must have a license to practice. If this condition is false, the employer has the right to void the contract.

Warranties, on the other hand, are promises that appear in the contract that require strict compliance. These may include agreements, promises, or representations, but a warranty is essentially a guarantee from the contracting party. In some cases, a warranty may state that a product is as promised or that one party will compensate the other if they aren't satisfied.

Warranties come in two forms: affirmative and promissory. Affirmative warranties are assurances that certain statements are true and specific activities have taken place before the contract. Promissory warranties are future agreements. As such, warranties protect the parties from damages or a breach of contract. Today, warranties typically protect consumer products and are subject to federal law and the Uniform Commercial Code.

Extended warranties further protect the buyer after the initial purchase agreement. They're another form of insurance depending on the warranty coverage and state laws.

It's important to remember that the state of mind of the party with the warranty doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. A party can enforce a warranty even if the one holding it thinks it might face a breach.

Further, warranties differ from representations in the following ways:

  • A warranty is part of a contract, while a representation is a separate matter discussed before the contract.
  • Warranties are material, and a party claiming misrepresentation must establish materiality.
  • A warranty is explicitly stated on the face of a contract.
  • Representations are often oral or written before a contract.
  • Warranties must be followed and contracts remain binding even if a warranty undergoes a breach.
  • Damages are recoverable from a warranty breach.

When you understand the terms "representation" and "warranty," it's easier to know where a covenant comes into play. A covenant agreement is traditionally a promise in writing. The party agreeing to the covenant pledges that he or she has done or will do something if the stated facts are true. Historically, witnesses must establish covenant terms.

Covenants also tend to be secondary to the main purpose of the contract. For instance, there may be a covenant agreement preventing a party from suing the other while a loan remains unpaid.

Covenant contract agreements, warranties, and representations have become the norm for contracts. While some choose to use the terms "agree," "obligate," or "represent" in place of the more formal legal terms, the concepts remain the same.

Covenants for Title

When someone obtains a title to real estate property, he or she is afforded six covenants. These include:

  • Covenant for seisin.
  • Covenant of the right to convey.
  • Covenant against encumbrances.
  • Covenant for quiet enjoyment.
  • Covenant of general warranty.
  • Covenant for further assurances.

Deeds that provide for usual covenants include the first five of the above. If a deed includes full covenants, it extends to all six of these covenants.

Covenants for seisin and covenants of the right to convey are typically considered the same thing. They guarantee the person granting the deed is the owner of the property that he or she is selling or transferring.

Covenants against encumbrances guarantee that properties being conveyed are not subject to any outstanding interests or rights, including liens, mortgages, profits, easements, and restrictions that would lessen the property's value. Zoning restrictions are not considered a covenant breach, although a violation of a building or zoning restriction is considered a breach.

The first three covenants typically do not "run with the land," while the final three do.

Covenants of quiet enjoyment and general warranty both protect the person receiving the deed against unlawful claims of other people who might try to convict the grantee.

Finally, the covenant for further assurances is rarely used in the United States. In this covenant, the deed granter promises to perform any necessary acts within his or her ability to perfect the title.

When a breach of a covenant occurs, the covenantee experiences financial loss since these covenants are contracts of indemnity. In most cases, the maximum amount of damages one can pursue for the breach is the land's purchase price plus interest.

Covenants in Land Use Planning

Covenants often affect land use planning and help create particular types of communities as part of neighborhood plans. For example, a developer might buy vacant land to divide it into buildable housing lots. The developer pays a low price for the undeveloped land and then sells the divided lots with a number of restrictive covenants.

The developer might specify in the sales contract that the owner cannot further divide the lot and must construct a house of a certain size and specification to ensure the community has a cohesive look. In this case, courts can enforce these types of covenants as long as they benefit and burden all property owners in the development equally.

Even so, covenants can't be enforced if they're used for illegal purposes. In 1948, the Supreme Court ruled in Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1, 68 S. Ct. 836, 92 L. Ed. 1161 that "no court or state officials have the power under law to take any action toward the enforcement of a racial covenant." In this Supreme Court case, a group of neighbors sued to keep a property owner from selling his home to African-Americans. The neighbors used the argument that the owner was subject to the restrictive covenants, but the covenant was found to be unenforceable based on equal housing laws and the fact that it was a Civil Rights violation.

Remedies for Breach of Covenant

When a covenant is breached, courts may provide several remedies:

  • Injunctions: Courts may issue orders to stop the violating action, such as preventing unauthorized land use or business competition.
  • Damages: Financial compensation may be awarded for losses directly caused by the breach.
  • Specific performance: In rare cases, courts compel the party to honor the original covenant terms.

Remedies depend on the type of covenant, the extent of the breach, and the jurisdiction. Courts generally try to balance the enforcing party’s legitimate interests with fairness to the breaching party.

Common Mistakes

If you provide false representation in a covenant agreement contract, the defrauded party might choose to void the entire agreement. When this happens, they're entitled to financial recovery, which you'll need to provide.

Always be willing to accept responsibility when entering a contract.

If you're drawing up a contract, don't forget to include necessary covenant agreements. Consult legal counsel if you need help determining which covenants apply to your situation.

Drafting Best Practices

To strengthen enforceability and reduce disputes, consider these drafting best practices:

  1. Use precise language: Clearly define restricted activities, geographic scope, and duration.
  2. Tailor to business needs: Avoid one-size-fits-all templates; each covenant should reflect the specific risks of the business.
  3. Comply with state law: Some states require specific disclosures, notice periods, or compensation to enforce covenants.
  4. Include severability clauses: Allow courts to narrow overly broad restrictions instead of voiding the covenant entirely.
  5. Address assignability: Ensure protections continue in the event of mergers, acquisitions, or reorganizations.

Properly drafted covenants not only protect business interests but also withstand judicial scrutiny.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is covenant consent in a contract?
    Covenant consent refers to the mutual agreement of all parties to be bound by specific promises in a contract. Without consent, the covenant may be unenforceable.
  2. Are covenant agreements enforceable in every state?
    No. States differ significantly. For example, California generally bans non-competes, while Florida and Texas enforce them if reasonable.
  3. What happens if a covenant agreement is breached?
    Courts may award damages, issue injunctions, or, in some cases, require specific performance depending on the nature of the breach.
  4. Can covenant agreements be assigned to another business owner?
    Yes, but only if the contract includes an assignability clause. Otherwise, the new owner may not inherit enforcement rights after a business sale.
  5. How can businesses avoid mistakes in drafting covenants?
    They should use clear language, comply with state law, avoid overly broad restrictions, and include clauses for severability and assignability.

If you need help drawing up a contract or understanding covenant agreements, post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. We accept only the top 5 percent of lawyers to our marketplace, which often come from leading schools like Yale Law and Harvard Law.