Key Takeaways

  • A firm offer is a binding commitment by a merchant to keep an offer open for a set period under the UCC, even without consideration.
  • Option contracts, by contrast, require consideration to keep the offer open and can apply to a wider range of transactions beyond the sale of goods.
  • The main difference in firm offer vs option contract lies in consideration, applicability, and flexibility — firm offers are typically limited to UCC-governed goods transactions, while option contracts can cover services, real estate, and more.
  • Firm offers are automatically irrevocable for the specified time (or up to 3 months if no time is stated), while option contracts remain open as long as the parties agree and consideration is provided.
  • Understanding how and when to use each tool is essential for negotiating contracts, ensuring enforceability, and managing commercial risks.

A firm offer is an offer that has been promised to be left open in writing and cannot be revoked.

What Is a Firm Offer?

When goods are sold, a firm offer is considered to have taken place when there has been a signed promise to keep the offer open and the merchant involved in the sale qualifies as a merchant under the Uniform Commercial Code. In many cases, customers will request a firm offer so they can be sure of their pricing over a set period of time. Many merchants also ask their suppliers for firm offers.

Although there are several advantages to firm offers, the risk is that the circumstances may change, meaning that the original offer would no longer be reasonable. For example, the raw material cost may increase or your inventory may run out, meaning you cannot sustain the price you originally offered.

Firm offers will only last for the amount of time that is listed in the offer. Should the offer not specify a time limit, the offer will remain open for three months maximum.

The person receiving the offer has the right to request a firm quotation, and they may also ask that the person making the offers signs confirmation. If you are depending on a firm offer to help you conduct business, you should be sure that the offer fulfills the requirements listed in Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code.

The Firm Offer Rule in the Uniform Commercial Code only applies to merchants that sell goods. If you are a merchant that is governed by the UCC, it's important that you understand this rule. Make sure you gain a familiarity with the fine details of this rule.

The Firm Offer Rule applies in a variety of circumstances where a time period has not been expressly stated:

  • There is an existing offer to sell or purchase goods.
  • A signed agreement keeping the offer open exists, but there is no stated timeframe.
  • Both parties involved in the offer are merchants who are familiar with the process of selling and buying goods.

Any time a contract is drafted for the purpose of selling goods, the Firm Offer Rule may be applicable. An example of the firm offer rule could be a merchant agreeing to sell one hundred units of a certain good at a fixed price of $50 for a period of 60 days. Time limits on firm offers can be extended by offering a new offer or agreeing to an option contract.

When Firm Offers Are Most Effective

Firm offers are particularly useful in commercial transactions involving goods, where predictability and trust are essential. Because they are governed by Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), they most often arise when merchants negotiate bulk sales, supplier agreements, or long-term purchasing deals.

For example, a supplier may guarantee a price for raw materials for 60 days, allowing the buyer time to finalize production schedules and financing. This level of price stability benefits both parties: the buyer gains certainty and reduces market risk, while the seller strengthens business relationships and demonstrates reliability.

However, the irrevocable nature of a firm offer also introduces risk — if market conditions change drastically, the offeror remains bound to the original terms. Because of this, businesses often use firm offers when they have stable supply chains or when predictability outweighs the risk of changing costs.

Rules for Writing a Firm Offer

In contracts that are regulated by the UCC, all parties are required to be merchants. The merchant that is selling the goods is known as the offeror. Offers will remain valid for a set period of time. This time period can be either implied or expressly stated. For express time limits, the contract should list the amount of time so the buyer will have the information they need to decide if they will agree to the contract.

You must meet a variety of UCC requirements if you wish to use an implied time period. Both parties also need to consider how much money will be involved in the deal.

Common Pitfalls and Legal Considerations

While firm offers are straightforward under the UCC, several legal nuances can affect their enforceability:

  • Merchant status: Only offers made by a merchant — someone who deals in goods of the kind involved — qualify under UCC §2-205. A non-merchant cannot create a firm offer under this rule.
  • Written and signed requirement: The promise to keep the offer open must be in writing and signed by the offeror. Oral promises to hold an offer open are generally unenforceable.
  • Time limit: If no duration is specified, the offer remains open for a “reasonable time,” but never longer than three months.
  • Modification or withdrawal: Once the period expires, the offer may be revoked unless renewed or replaced with an option contract.

These details often become critical in disputes. For instance, a merchant’s casual email without a clear time frame could lead to uncertainty about whether a valid firm offer exists. Careful drafting that meets all statutory requirements ensures the offer is enforceable and limits future legal challenges.

Differences Between Firm Offers and Option Contracts

Option contracts are agreements made between sellers and buyers. These contracts allow the purchaser to buy a good at a later date and at a specific price to which both parties agree. The agreed upon price in an option contract is referred to as a strike price. The person that benefits from the option is called the beneficiary, and the person providing the option is known as the grantor. Options that allow the beneficiary to purchase an asset at the strike price are called put options.

A call option is an option that allows the beneficiary to require that the grantor sell them property at the strike price. Firm offers are offers that remain in place for a set period of time and cannot be withdrawn until that time period has expired. The primary difference between firm offers and option contracts is that option contracts are only valid when they are supported by consideration. Contracts between two parties only exist after the contract has been offered and accepted.

Firm Offer vs Option Contract – Detailed Comparison

Although both legal tools serve to keep offers open, firm offers and option contracts differ significantly in several key aspects:

Feature Firm Offer Option Contract
Consideration No consideration required. The merchant’s promise is binding by law. Consideration is essential — the offeree must give something of value to keep the offer open.
Applicability Limited to the sale of goods under the UCC and requires a merchant. Broader application, including services, real estate, and intellectual property.
Duration Irrevocable for the time stated (or up to 3 months if unspecified). Remains open for the agreed period, which can be longer than 3 months if consideration is provided.
Revocability Cannot be revoked during the specified period. Cannot be revoked during the option period, but the offer may lapse if not exercised.
Flexibility Less flexible — bound by UCC merchant provisions. Highly flexible — terms and duration are negotiable between parties.

These differences have practical implications. For instance, in fast-changing industries or high-value transactions, an option contract offers more flexibility and can extend beyond the UCC’s limitations. But for short-term commercial sales, a firm offer often provides a quicker and less costly solution.

Choosing the Right Approach for Your Agreement

The choice between a firm offer and an option contract often depends on the nature of the transaction and the parties’ goals:

  • Use a firm offer when dealing with goods, where both parties are merchants, and a short-term, consideration-free commitment is preferred.
  • Choose an option contract when you need extended flexibility, are negotiating over services or property, or want the offer to remain open beyond three months.

In many cases, businesses incorporate both mechanisms — starting with a firm offer for initial negotiations and transitioning to an option contract if extended time or broader terms become necessary.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Can a firm offer last longer than three months?
    Only if renewed or replaced by an option contract. Under the UCC, a firm offer cannot exceed three months without consideration.
  2. Is consideration always required for an option contract?
    Yes. Without consideration — even something nominal — the promise to keep the offer open is generally unenforceable.
  3. What happens if a merchant tries to revoke a firm offer early?
    Revocation is invalid if the firm offer meets UCC requirements. The offer remains binding until the stated period expires.
  4. Can a non-merchant make a firm offer?
    No. Only merchants as defined by the UCC can make firm offers. Non-merchants must rely on standard contract principles or option contracts.
  5. Which is better: a firm offer or an option contract?
    It depends on your transaction. Firm offers are ideal for short-term goods sales without consideration, while option contracts are more suitable for long-term, flexible agreements involving any type of property or service.

If you need help writing a firm offer, you can post your legal needs on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.