Types of Duress in Contract Law and Their Legal Impact

Key Takeaways

• Duress in contract law involves coercion that deprives a party of free will in agreeing to a contract.
• The main types of duress in contract law include physical duress, economic duress, and duress to goods.
• Courts examine the nature of threats, the victim's perception, and available alternatives to determine the validity of a duress claim.
• Undue influence differs from duress and involves exploitation of a position of trust rather than direct threats.
• Legal remedies may include rescinding the contract, restitution, or damages.
• Seeking legal assistance is advisable when facing duress-related contract disputes.

A duress contract law is a set of legal rules and standards that address issues arising from contracts that one party compels another party to enter into against their will or judgment by threats to harm them for noncompliance.

Duress

Duress is connected to the way undue influence is used. Duress is said to exist when a party is urgently threatened with physically harmful violence that can't be avoided except by compliance. It's the state of the victim's mind, which is induced by the threat that determines duress, and not the nature of the threat. Contracts signed under duress are typically invalidated by the court.

In some cases, duress goes beyond urgent, physical threats. Threatening the reputation and other personal belongings of a person to get them to sign a contract involuntarily also amounts to duress. Some cases of duress may not be easy to determine in court. However, when a threat of physical harm is proven, the proof can rapidly result in making the contract invalid and lead to charging the perpetrator with criminal offenses. 

What Constitutes Duress in Contract Law

Duress occurs when one party is forced into an agreement through threats, intimidation, or other forms of pressure, leaving them with no reasonable alternative but to comply. A key principle in contract law is that all parties must enter into agreements voluntarily. If a party signs under duress, the agreement may be considered voidable.

Duress does not always involve physical violence. It can also include psychological pressure or coercion that overwhelms an individual's free will. The law looks beyond the form of the threat to examine whether the victim had a meaningful choice or was effectively compelled to act against their will.

The Different Forms of Duress

Other forms of duress, when proven, grant the party who was forced into the agreement the alternative of canceling the contract. This isn't the case with threatened physical harm, in which the contract is invalid with no alternatives. 

The following are some instances of duress:

• A threat of physical harm to the party, their family, or belongings.
• A threat of humiliating the party by blackmail or scandal.
• A threat of causing substantial financial loss to the party.
• A threat of criminally prosecuting or suing someone related to the party.

Not all threats made to compel another party's compliance are considered duress. For example, if one party to a contract threatens to sue another party to meet a condition, that wouldn't be duress because a lawsuit is legal.

Duress to Goods

Duress to goods is another form of coercion where a party unlawfully seizes or threatens to seize another’s property to force them into a contract. For example, if a storage facility threatens to unlawfully withhold or destroy a person's goods unless they sign a disadvantageous agreement, this may be deemed duress to goods.

While less common than physical or economic duress, this form is recognized in jurisdictions that consider control over personal property a significant pressure tactic.

Economic Duress

An economic pressure is a form of duress typically associated with disputes arising from commercial contracts. There's said to be an economic duress when one party puts financial pressure on the other to unfairly compel them to accept a binding agreement against their will. Economic duress can't be said to exist just because prices are raised for services or goods by one party. However, if the prices are raised by the same entity that created the necessity for the services or goods, then, the court may allow a claim of economic duress.

Common Indicators of Economic Duress

Economic duress may be established through several indicators, including:

• A party threatening to terminate an existing contract unless unfavorable new terms are agreed upon.
• Withholding goods or services critical to the other party’s business operations.
• Taking advantage of a party's financial vulnerability to impose harsh conditions.
• Lack of reasonable alternatives or legal recourse at the time of contract execution.

To successfully claim economic duress, the claimant must prove that the agreement was not entered into voluntarily and that the pressure applied was illegitimate or unconscionable.

Determining Cases of Duress in Court

To determine duress in a contract, the affected party has to provide the following:

• Proof that there's a running contract between them and the defendant.
• Proof that the accused party threatened them to enter into the contract.
• Proof that they were compelled to accept the conditions of the accused party because of the threat.
• Proof that the threat was urgent and potentially involved death or serious, physical harm, and was expressed by actions or words at the time of being threatened by the accused person.
• Proof that they truly feared that the threatening party would carry out their threat. The court recognizes that determining or measuring how afraid a party might have been is not easily practicable. However, it considers the reasonable possibility of the threat being carried out and also considers whether someone else in a similar situation would have been reasonably afraid.
• Proof that they had no reasonable way of escaping the threat, except by compliance. 

Legal Remedies for Contracts Signed Under Duress

If a court determines that a contract was formed under duress, several remedies may be available:

• Rescission: The contract may be canceled, and the parties returned to their pre-contractual positions.
• Restitution: The wronged party may be entitled to recover any benefits or money paid under the duress.
• Damages: In some cases, monetary compensation may be awarded for losses resulting from the contract.

Courts typically aim to place the victim in the position they would have been in had the duress not occurred.

Undue Influence

Duress involves being forced into a contract through threats, while undue influence has to do with taking advantage of an entity through a position of trust. Only a superior entity or a respected person in a position of trust can exert undue influence on another. When such a person puts too much pressure on the other party to accept an agreement they would rather not accept, it constitutes undue influence.

If the affected party is able to provide proof of undue influence in court, they may be permitted to void the contract if they choose to. One of the major differences between undue influence and duress is whether or not the party doing the convincing is trusted by the other party or superior to them. 

Key Differences Between Duress and Undue Influence

While both duress and undue influence can render a contract voidable, they differ in nature:

Understanding these distinctions helps courts assess whether consent was freely given.

Duress-related laws aren't exclusively applicable to contract cases. If someone commits a crime under duress, they may not suffer criminal penalties. Duress-related cases can be tricky, but a knowledgeable, experienced, trusted lawyer can help make things easy and goofproof.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the different types of duress in contract law? The main types are physical duress, economic duress, and duress to goods. Each involves coercive tactics that undermine a party's free will.

2. Is emotional pressure considered duress in contract law? While emotional pressure alone may not always meet the threshold for duress, it can support a claim if combined with threats or manipulation.

3. Can a threat to sue be considered duress? Generally, threats to pursue legal action are not considered duress unless they are baseless or made in bad faith.

4. What’s the difference between duress and undue influence? Duress involves threats or coercion, while undue influence involves misuse of a trusted relationship to obtain agreement.

5. Can a contract be enforced if signed under duress? No, if a contract is proven to have been signed under duress, it may be declared void or voidable by a court.

How to Get Help

If you need help with duress contract law, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.