Key Takeaways:

  • Restitution is a legal remedy aimed at restoring victims to their pre-loss state, often through monetary or service-based compensation.
  • It can arise in both criminal and civil contexts, with different standards and applications.
  • Criminal restitution is typically mandated by courts and may be enforced through various collection mechanisms.
  • Civil restitution prevents unjust enrichment and typically applies in contract and tort law.
  • Courts consider factors like the offender’s financial situation, victim impact, and statutory guidelines when determining restitution.
  • Victim services agencies play a key role in monitoring and enforcing restitution payments.
  • Restitution is distinct from compensation, focusing on returning gains rather than covering losses.

Restitution definition law refers to a monetary payment that is imposed as a penalty to restore a loss. Usually, monetary payments are included in the judgment in negligence or contracts cases. Restitution may require the stolen goods to be returned to the victim. In other cases, restitution requires the victim to receive payment for the harm they endured.

What Is Restitution?

When it comes to criminal law, restitution refers to the state programs that require an offender to donate services or repay money to the victim or society as a whole as a condition of their sentence. As a general term, restitution is the act of restoration. This term is used in various areas of the law. However, no matter the area of law, the term retains the same meaning.

Achieving fairness is the main purpose of restitution. Another purpose of restitution is to avoid the unjust enrichment of any of the parties, namely the offender.

Restitution requires that the offender give up any gains that they obtained unlawfully and return these gains to the plaintiff. Restitution is used most frequently in contracts law.

In contracts law, restitution is designed to make sure the injured party is restored to the position they enjoyed prior to the contract's formation, if possible. Parties who are seeking restitution are unable to seek lost earnings or profits caused by the breach of the contract.

The plaintiff needs to include a claim in the initial complaint in order to get restitution. If the amount cannot be determined with certainty, the plaintiff will not receive an award.

Restitution in Criminal vs. Civil Law

Restitution can be applied in both criminal and civil legal contexts, though the goals and procedures vary.

  • Criminal Restitution: Ordered by courts as part of a sentence. The offender must repay victims for financial losses directly resulting from the crime (e.g., medical expenses, stolen property, or lost wages). It is a legal obligation, not a voluntary act.
  • Civil Restitution: Typically arises from a civil lawsuit and seeks to prevent unjust enrichment. A party that has been wrongfully benefited at the expense of another may be required to return what was gained, even absent a criminal act.

In criminal cases, restitution serves both restorative and rehabilitative purposes, aiming to repair harm while holding offenders accountable. In civil law, it focuses on fairness between parties.

History of Restitution

The concept of restitution was first created in the courts of England in the 17th century. The courts created the concept of restitution to serve as a contractual remedy.

Eventually, the concept of restitution moved to the courts in the U.S. Since then, the concept of restitution has expended significantly beyond its roots.

Courts are now applying the idea of restitution in the following areas:

  • Admiralty or maritime law
  • Criminal law
  • Torts law

When it comes to admiralty law, restitution may be demanded when a shipping crew needs to throw goods into the sea to make sure the ship remains a float. In such a scenario, the owner of the goods that were jettisoned may gain recovery for the goods under restitution.

In the criminal arena, restitution refers to the defendant's affirmative performance that benefits the general public or the victim of the crime.

How Restitution Is Determined

Restitution is a very common feature in criminal law when it comes to the sentences of criminal defendants. If it's possible to identify the victim, the judge will order the offender to make restitution to the identified victim. For example, if the offender stole the stereo of the person, the offender may have to give the victim the stereo back or reimburse the victim for the stereo. The offender will also face punishment in the form of monetary fines and/or jail time. 

Courts attempt to fashion the criminal defendant's restitution based on the crime committed. If the defendant is convicted of the crime of solicitation of prostitution, the defendant may be ordered to volunteer at a local shelter for homeless or battered women. This is an example of restitution to the public as a whole.

Other civil damages that the defendant is forced to pay are distinct from restitutionary damages. This is because civil damages are not determined by the amount needed to restore the victim to their former status.

For example, punitive damages refer to damages that are assessed against the civil defendant to punish the conduct of the defendant. Punitive damages are not imposed to provide restitution.

When it comes to restitution, there is typically a search for the "unjust factor." In Scotland, restitution is usually made in the event that there is no legal cause for a transfer and it is unjust for the defender to keep the enriching transfer. The idea of the unjust factor has been recognized in both Australia and Canada for some time.

Factors Courts Consider in Awarding Restitution

Courts weigh several key factors when determining whether restitution is appropriate and in what amount:

  • Victim’s Actual Losses: The primary benchmark is the amount of the victim’s financial harm.
  • Causal Connection: The loss must be directly linked to the defendant’s criminal conduct.
  • Defendant’s Financial Resources: Courts may assess the offender’s ability to pay, although inability to pay does not necessarily eliminate the restitution order.
  • Plea Agreements: Some plea deals may include specific restitution terms.
  • Statutory Requirements: Certain crimes, especially those involving fraud or theft, may mandate restitution under state or federal law.

Judges strive to ensure restitution awards are fair, enforceable, and consistent with legal standards.

What Is the Difference Between Restitution and Compensation?

The difference between compensation and restitution lies in the method that is used to calculate the monetary award. Compensation, such as back pay, refers to payment to the victim for the wrong that has been inflicted. Compensation can be compared to a gift that is given to the victim or their family to help or apologize. Restitution, on the other hand, restores the victim financially.

Limitations and Challenges of Restitution

While restitution is intended to support victims, it has notable limitations:

  • Non-Monetary Losses: Emotional distress or pain and suffering are typically not recoverable through restitution.
  • Inability to Pay: Many offenders lack the financial means to fulfill their restitution obligations, limiting recovery for victims.
  • Lengthy Collection Periods: Payments may be spread out over many years, delaying full compensation.
  • Administrative Burden: Tracking and enforcing restitution can require significant resources from courts and victim services agencies.

Despite these limitations, restitution remains a critical tool for promoting accountability and restoring victims.

How Restitution Is Collected and Enforced

Once restitution is ordered, several mechanisms exist to collect and enforce payment:

  • Payment Plans: Offenders may be placed on structured payment schedules based on ability to pay.
  • Wage Garnishment: Courts can authorize deductions from an offender’s income.
  • Interception of Tax Refunds: Some jurisdictions allow restitution collection from federal or state tax returns.
  • Parole or Probation Conditions: Restitution compliance may be monitored as a term of supervised release.
  • Court Monitoring: Victim services units or restitution recovery departments may track payments and notify victims of progress or delinquency.

Failure to pay restitution can lead to additional legal consequences, including probation revocation or contempt of court charges.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What types of losses can restitution cover? Restitution can cover direct out-of-pocket expenses like medical bills, stolen property, and lost income. It does not typically include emotional distress or punitive damages.

2. Can a victim still seek restitution if the offender is incarcerated? Yes. Restitution can still be ordered and collected while the offender is in prison, though payments may be limited by the inmate’s financial resources.

3. What happens if the offender doesn’t pay restitution? Failure to pay can lead to legal consequences such as wage garnishment, additional court penalties, or revocation of parole or probation.

4. Is restitution the same as a civil lawsuit settlement? No. Civil settlements may include compensation for a wide range of losses, while restitution specifically seeks to restore the victim to their previous financial state.

5. Who monitors restitution payments? Restitution payments are often monitored by the court, probation officers, or victim services agencies, depending on the jurisdiction.

If you need help with restitution law or the definition of restitution, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.