Key Takeaways

  • Cumulative voting lets shareholders concentrate multiple votes on one or more candidates, increasing minority shareholder influence.
  • The cumulative voting formula—X = (S × N) / (D + 1) + 1—calculates the minimum shares needed to elect a desired number of directors.
  • This system contrasts with statutory voting, where votes must be evenly distributed across positions.
  • Advantages include fairer representation for minority shareholders and protection against majority domination.
  • Disadvantages include potential board inefficiency, factionalism, and complex voting management.
  • Corporations must include bylaws or charter provisions authorizing cumulative voting for it to be valid.
  • Knowing how to apply the formula helps shareholders strategize their voting power effectively.

What Is Cumulative Voting?

Cumulative voting is a type of voting system used by a company's shareholders that allows them to distribute their votes between candidates when voting for a company's directors. It is also known as proportional voting.

Shareholders get one vote per share that they hold, multiplied by the number of directors that need electing.

Where multiple candidates are running for a position, each shareholder can choose between voting for a single candidate or splitting their votes between multiple candidates.

How Does Cumulative Voting Work?

If a shareholder with 10 shares is participating in a vote for two open board seats, with Candidates 1 and 2 running for one seat, and Candidates 3 and 4 running for the second seat, they would receive 20 votes (10 x 2). The shareholder's options are as follows:

  • Only vote for a candidate for the first seat, using all 20 votes for either Candidate 1.
  • Do the same with the second seat, using all 20 votes for Candidate 3.
  • Vote in both races and split their votes equally, giving 10 to Candidate 1 and 10 to Candidate 3.
  • Split their votes in a different proportion, such as 15 votes for Candidate 1 and 5 votes for Candidate 3.
  • Choose throwaway votes, sending 10 votes to Candidate 1 and not using the remaining votes.
  • Submit a blank ballot.

Understanding the Cumulative Voting Formula

The cumulative voting formula is a mathematical method used to determine how many shares a shareholder must control to guarantee the election of a specific number of directors. This formula ensures a fair representation of minority shareholders by letting them concentrate votes strategically.

The standard cumulative voting formula is:

X = (S × N) / (D + 1) + 1 

Where:

  • X = minimum shares needed to elect N directors
  • S = total number of voting shares
  • N = number of directors the shareholder wants to elect
  • D = total number of directors to be elected

For example, if a company has 1,000 shares and five directors to be elected, a shareholder wanting to elect one director would need:(1,000 × 1) / (5 + 1) + 1 = 167 shares.

This calculation shows that even small shareholders can secure representation if they pool their votes effectively.

The formula is not only used to predict voting outcomes but also to formulate strategic alliances among minority shareholders. Investors may decide whether to concentrate votes on one candidate (“plumping”) or distribute them among several based on their ownership and the number of available seats.

Cumulative Voting vs Statutory Voting

If a corporation does not use cumulative voting, the more common alternative is statutory voting. Statutory voting also gives each shareholder one vote per share, but shareholders must divide their votes evenly among the issues or positions being voted on.

For example, a shareholder with 10 shares who is voting for two open seats must divide those 20 votes evenly, using 10 votes for a candidate in the first race and 10 for a candidate in the second race.

Point System

Some corporations may choose to assign a points system in which shareholders get points to use as votes on a ballot.

Several factors could affect the number of points allotted, including the shareholder's place in the company and the number of shares held.

There are no rules within a cumulative voting system that limit how many points each voter can have, and shareholders do not need to be assigned an equal number of points.

Key Differences and Strategic Implications

While statutory voting favors majority shareholders—each share equaling one vote per open seat—cumulative voting empowers smaller investors by aggregating votes across seats. The difference isn’t just procedural but strategic.

Under statutory voting, a majority shareholder holding 51% of shares can dominate every election. Under cumulative voting, however, minority shareholders may combine their votes to elect at least one director, even if they own less than half of the company’s shares.

For instance, in a company with 1,000 shares and five board seats:

  • Statutory system: Majority shareholders can easily fill all seats.
  • Cumulative system: Minority shareholders pooling 20% of shares could win at least one seat if votes are concentrated strategically.

This system thus balances power dynamics and prevents the majority from fully excluding minority interests, making it especially popular in closely held or family corporations seeking equitable governance.

Cumulative Voting Ballots

On cumulative voting ballots, shareholders can show the number of votes they wish to give their chosen candidates.

On statutory voting ballots, shareholders are only able to choose a candidate. They cannot specify the number of votes; instead, votes will be divided evenly.

Here is an example of a cumulative voting ballot:

"Elect Three Board Seats. You own 20 shares, thus you have 120 points to use in voting (120 x 3).

  • James Carter - 80
  • Marlon Smith
  • Roger Davis - 40
  • Daniel Jones
  • Cliff Johnson

Total Votes: James Carter 80 Roger Davis 40"

How to Apply the Formula in Ballots

Applying the cumulative voting formula helps shareholders allocate votes wisely. When ballots are issued, the total number of votes each shareholder receives equals their shares multiplied by the number of open board seats.

For instance, owning 50 shares in an election for four directors gives you 200 votes. You may distribute these across candidates as follows:

  • Allocate all 200 votes to one candidate to maximize their chance (plumping).
  • Split votes among two or more candidates (e.g., 120 to one, 80 to another).
  • Spread votes evenly among all candidates.

Modern electronic voting platforms often incorporate automatic cumulative voting calculators to ensure fair allocation of votes according to the cumulative voting formula. These tools minimize human error and increase transparency in corporate elections.

What Is Needed For Cumulative Voting To Happen?

Cumulative voting can happen if the following conditions are met:

  1. Cumulative voting is optional under Corporations Code §7615(a) , but the Davis-Stirling Act requires cumulative voting on ballots if permitted in an association's governing documents. ( Civ. Code §5115(c) )
  2. Membership must be given notice of their right to cumulate their votes so all members can exercise that right. ( Corp. Code §7615(b) )
  3. When ballots are mailed to the membership, notice to cumulate votes should be given in the voting instructions.
  4. If cumulative voting is required, it only applies to director elections and only when more than one director is being elected to the board. However, bylaws may require that more than two seats be open for cumulative voting to take effect.
  5. Accordingly, associations must check their documents when adopting election rules. If an association is under developer control, more than two positions must be open before cumulative voting applies. ( Calif. Code of Regulations §2792.19(b)(1) )
  6. If the governing documents require cumulative voting in the election of directors, it will also apply to membership removal of individual directors.

Reasons To Consider Using Cumulative Voting

Cumulative voting benefits minority shareholders by allowing them to focus all of their votes on a single candidate or decision point. If multiple minority shareholders work together, they can often cause a change or win an appointment they want, despite being outnumbered.

For example, suppose two shareholders each have 25 shares in a company and a third has 40 shares, and they are all voting on two seats. If the first two put all of their votes towards the same candidate in just one of the seat elections, they can guarantee that candidate is elected, regardless of how the third shareholder votes.

With the right formula, a shareholder can calculate how many of their votes would be needed to choose a specific number of candidates. The following formula is used to calculate the exact number of shares needed to choose a majority of directors.

X = (SN/D+1) + 1

  • X is the number of shares needed to choose the number of directors
  • S is the total number of shares
  • N is the number of directors needed
  • D is the total number of directors that will be chosen

Using formulas like this one, a shareholder can choose the right voting strategy to get the desired result. The following are some of the more common strategies associated with this method:

  • Plumping – more than one vote allocated to the same candidate
  • Spread-out voting – a shareholder giving the majority of their votes to a single candidate

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Cumulative Voting System

Advantages:

  • Minority representation: Ensures diverse viewpoints on the board.
  • Prevents monopolization: Limits the majority’s control over all board seats.
  • Encourages negotiation: Promotes collaboration and compromise between shareholder groups.
  • Increases accountability: Directors elected by minority shareholders may advocate for policies benefiting broader stakeholders.

Disadvantages:

  • Potential for board division: Different factions may prioritize conflicting goals.
  • Complex vote management: Requires precise calculations and clear communication to avoid confusion.
  • Possible manipulation: Groups may form alliances to gain disproportionate control, potentially disrupting board unity.

While cumulative voting increases fairness, it works best in companies committed to transparency and effective governance structures. Legal consultation is advisable when incorporating cumulative voting into corporate bylaws to ensure compliance with state law and corporate governance standards.

Problems With Cumulative Voting

Cumulative voting can also be a negative thing. Using this voting method makes it easy for disruptive single candidates to get on the board of directors. This kind of voting system also makes it almost impossible to remove a director once elected. A small section of shareholders can block the move, even if most of the voters approve.

Removing a Director With Cumulative Voting

Once the recall of a director is approved, the removal can be blocked if the votes cast against the removal of a director would be enough to elect the director in a cumulative voting system.

The following formula can be used:

V>(1/D+1)*M

V = number of votes needed to block removal

D = total number of directors authorized in the bylaws

M = total number of members entitled to vote

For example, if there are 50 shareholders eligible to vote, and there are eight directors on the board, we would need 6 or more votes to block the recall. This is shown by the following formula:

V>(1/8+1)*50

Legal Framework and Implementation Considerations

The legality of cumulative voting depends on state corporate laws and the corporation’s own charter or bylaws. In most U.S. states, corporations may adopt cumulative voting provisions voluntarily, but some (like California and Illinois) require explicit inclusion in the articles of incorporation.

Corporate counsel must ensure:

  1. Bylaws include a clear cumulative voting clause.
  2. Notice is given to all shareholders before the election that cumulative voting will apply.
  3. Election procedures are consistent with state statutes—such as the California Corporations Code §708 or Delaware General Corporation Law §214.

Companies using cumulative voting should also document vote tabulation procedures and provide transparent audit trails to reduce disputes.

If shareholders wish to ensure proper application of this voting structure, they can seek guidance from experienced corporate attorneys. UpCounsel’s marketplace connects companies with qualified lawyers who can help draft or review voting provisions and ensure full compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the purpose of the cumulative voting formula?
    It helps shareholders calculate the minimum shares required to elect one or more directors, ensuring fair representation in corporate governance.
  2. How is the cumulative voting formula calculated?
    Use the formula X = (S × N) / (D + 1) + 1, where S = total shares, N = directors desired, and D = total directors being elected.
  3. Is cumulative voting mandatory for corporations?
    No, it’s typically optional unless state law or a corporation’s charter specifically requires it.
  4. Who benefits the most from cumulative voting?
    Minority shareholders gain influence, as they can pool votes to secure at least one board seat.
  5. Can cumulative voting be used in nonprofit organizations or associations?
    Yes, many nonprofits and cooperatives use cumulative voting to ensure equal representation among members.

If you need help with cumulative voting, you can post your question on UpCounsel's marketplace. Upcounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures and Airbnb.