Key Takeaways

  • Indemnity clauses in construction contracts shift liability for third-party claims.
  • They are distinct from warranties and must be clearly drafted to avoid confusion or invalidation.
  • States vary in enforceability—some prohibit clauses indemnifying for a party’s own negligence.
  • Broad form, intermediate form, and limited form indemnities offer different levels of protection.
  • Anti-indemnity statutes in some states restrict clauses that indemnify against sole negligence.
  • Caps on indemnity and insurance-backed provisions can balance risk between parties.
  • Courts may sever or strike down indemnity clauses that are overbroad, vague, or unconscionable.

A construction contract indemnification clause is one that discusses who is responsible for the damages or losses that are incurred in connection with a construction job. An indemnification clause is a provision that provides one party security against losses, and may even exempt them from liability arising from their own actions. These provisions usually say that the contractor will indemnify the project owner and hold them harmless, or without fault, from any claims, losses, demands, or lawsuits that result from any defects in the contractor's work.

An indemnification clause is often a necessity in construction agreements, and the business deal may not proceed without a clear picture of what each party's liabilities are. Indemnity clauses are very specific and need to be drafted clearly so both parties understand the terms. It's highly recommended you have a contract attorney draft any indemnification clauses. The attorney can not only draft and review an indemnification clause; he or she can also provide legal advice if a lawsuit is filed.

Tips for Drafting Indemnification Clauses

Indemnity clauses are sometimes applied incorrectly in construction contracts. The error usually occurs when the drafting party wants to build more protection into an indemnification clause by including the promise to “indemnify” the other party against defective materials and workmanship. In this instance, the contract should include a warranty, not an indemnity clause. Warranties are agreements that indicate the materials and labor will be of a particular quality. In contrast, an indemnity clause would protect the other party against third-party claims.

There is a chance defective material could give rise to a liability claim. For example, if a product is defective, a worker could be injured. The indemnification clause protects the owner against a claim from the worker while the warranty would cover repairs to the defective product. Some courts have opined that indemnification clauses should not be interpreted as offering indemnity to someone against his or her own wrongdoing because doing so might encourage carelessness. The prevailing legal view is that indemnity is akin to insurance.

Types of Indemnity Clauses in Construction Contracts

Indemnity clauses generally fall into three categories, each with differing levels of protection and enforceability depending on the jurisdiction:

  1. Broad Form Indemnity – The contractor agrees to indemnify the owner even for damages resulting from the owner’s sole negligence. These are often unenforceable in many states due to public policy concerns.
  2. Intermediate Form Indemnity – The contractor indemnifies the owner for damages resulting from joint negligence (e.g., both the contractor and owner share fault).
  3. Limited Form Indemnity – The contractor only indemnifies the owner for damages caused by the contractor’s own negligence or the negligence of its subcontractors.

Because enforcement depends on state law, parties should be cautious and seek legal advice when negotiating indemnity terms.

Are Indemnity Clauses Legal?

As long as they don't violate any laws or liability requirements, indemnification clauses are typically enforced. Some states are not a fan of clauses that limit contractor liability because they believe contractors already owe the property owner a general duty of care. Some states may reject the clause entirely or accept it with limitations. Courts are more likely to accept an indemnity clause if it doesn't directly limit the contractor's liability for wrongdoing or negligence.

Because indemnity clauses fall under contract law, parties can negotiate the terms that fit their individual circumstances. They must adhere to liability law requirements, though, in order to be enforceable.

Anti-Indemnity Statutes in Construction Law

Many states have adopted anti-indemnity statutes that restrict or prohibit indemnity agreements in construction contracts, especially those that attempt to indemnify a party for its own negligence. For example:

  • California prohibits broad form indemnity in most construction contracts, especially those involving residential projects.
  • Texas restricts indemnification for claims related to personal injury or death caused by a party's own negligence in commercial construction.
  • New York disallows agreements that seek to indemnify a party for its own negligence in building service contracts.

These statutes aim to protect subcontractors and small contractors from overreaching clauses often imposed by larger entities. It's essential to check local statutes before enforcing or drafting an indemnity agreement construction contract.

Invalidating an Indemnity Clause

There are circumstances where an indemnity clause could be invalidated:

  • If it was created under duress or fraud
  • If the indemnity clause is difficult to identify
  • If the clause contains confusing or misleading language

Common Pitfalls That Lead to Enforcement Issues

Even if an indemnity clause is generally legal, it can still be rendered unenforceable due to poor drafting or overly aggressive language. Common pitfalls include:

  • Ambiguity or overbreadth: Vague language may leave interpretation up to the courts, often to the detriment of the drafting party.
  • Unconscionability: Courts may strike clauses that are one-sided or grossly unfair.
  • Failure to comply with statutory requirements: Some states require specific language or limit indemnity to damages “to the extent caused” by a party’s negligence.

To avoid these issues, use precise language, ensure mutual understanding, and tailor the clause to the laws of the governing jurisdiction.

Remedies for Improper Indemnity Clauses

A common option for remedying an improper indemnity clause is when the court allows the parties to rewrite the clause. Allowing revisions ensures the clause is a better reflection of the drafting parties' original intentions. A judge might opt to strike down only a portion of the indemnification clause, leaving the remainder of the clause enforceable.

However, if the judge finds the clause to be invalid in its entirety, the parties are not held to the terms. Liability will be determined per relevant state laws or ruling case law.

Best Practices for Limiting Risk in Indemnity Agreements

Contractors and owners can minimize disputes by adopting the following best practices:

  • Include monetary caps on indemnity obligations to limit exposure.
  • Tie indemnity to insurance coverage so the indemnitor’s obligations are supported by commercial general liability policies.
  • Incorporate reciprocal indemnity clauses where applicable, especially in agreements between contractors and subcontractors.
  • Define trigger events for indemnity—e.g., only upon final judgment or specific categories of claims.
  • Require timely notice of claims to give the indemnifying party a fair opportunity to respond.

Following these principles makes indemnity provisions more predictable and reduces the likelihood of legal challenges.

Elements of a Good Indemnification Clause

A well-balanced indemnity clause will include:

  • Limit indemnification to property damage and personal injury.
  • When feasible, the contractor or subcontractor should limit its indemnity and hold harmless obligations to things it can get insurance for.
  • Limit indemnification clauses to third-party claims and leave out owners' claims on the contract.
  • Keep the clause limited to negligence with similar language to “caused by negligent acts or omissions of the contractor or any others for whom the contractor is responsible.”
  • Exclude contract claims, so the contractor has to be found negligent before the indemnity clause is triggered. The contractor shouldn't pay for the claim if it isn't caused by his or her negligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the difference between an indemnity clause and a warranty?
    An indemnity clause protects against third-party claims, while a warranty guarantees the quality or condition of work or materials. Warranties address performance; indemnities address liability.
  2. Are indemnity agreements enforceable in all states?
    Not necessarily. Many states have anti-indemnity statutes that prohibit certain types of indemnity agreements, particularly those that indemnify for a party’s sole negligence.
  3. Can a subcontractor be forced to indemnify for the general contractor’s negligence?
    In some states, this is prohibited. Limited or intermediate indemnity clauses may be enforceable, but broad form indemnities are often struck down.
  4. What happens if an indemnity clause is found to be invalid?
    The court may strike the clause entirely or revise it to reflect enforceable language, applying relevant contract and state laws to determine liability.
  5. Should indemnity obligations be tied to insurance coverage?
    Yes, this is a common best practice. It ensures that the party providing indemnity has financial backing to cover potential liabilities.

If you need help with a construction contract indemnification clause, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel only accepts the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.