Understanding a Limited Liability Clause in Contracts
A limited liability clause limits financial responsibility in contracts. Learn its types, enforceability, and negotiation tips to reduce legal exposure. 6 min read updated on April 23, 2025
Key Takeaways
- A limited liability clause caps a party's financial exposure in a contract.
- These clauses must be clearly written, visible, and not violate public policy.
- Enforceability varies by state and often hinges on fairness and clarity.
- Types of limitations include monetary caps, exclusions of liability, and time limits.
- Parties should consider negotiation strategies and insurance alignment when drafting such clauses.
Limited liability clause definition is used to limit the total amount of financial damages received if contract obligations are not fulfilled. Enforced under the general rules of freedom of contract in most states, the limited liability clause, or exculpatory clause, is designed to cap the liability of one of the parties on the contract. Contracts between companies often include clauses to limit liability.
Limited Liability Clauses
A limited liability clause can protect one party suing another party of the contract or from outside entities. The clause can also be used to protect a company who doesn't fulfill the obligations laid out in the contract by limiting how much the other party can recoup. When drafting a limited liability clause, it should be noted that:
- The liability clause can be as short as two sentences.
- The provision is written in all capital letters to meet the requirement of being clear and visible to the reader. This is a requirement of most states when creating a contract. The provision also answers the question that if something were to go wrong, how much is owed.
- The clause must include the overall scope and expectations of the indemnity or limited liability clause.
- A full and detailed description that covers all possible liabilities.
- If the clause violates public policy, the provisions will not be enforced. A violation of public policy example is if an existing statute conflicts with the contract clauses.
An example of a limited liability clause would be if a homeowner hires a roofing company. In the contract, a limited liability clause states that the roofing company's liability of $5,000. If the roof is installed then collapses and destroys the homeowner's personal property, the homeowner would only be able to receive $5,000 in compensation.
Enforceability of Limited Liability Clauses
Courts generally uphold limited liability clauses when they are:
- Clearly drafted and conspicuously presented (often in all caps or bold).
- Mutually agreed upon and not imposed under duress or gross inequality of bargaining power.
- Not in violation of public policy or statutory restrictions.
However, courts may strike down such clauses if they:
- Attempt to exclude liability for intentional harm or fraud.
- Contravene state-specific consumer or employment protections.
- Are buried in the fine print or too vague to be enforceable.
Because enforceability can vary by jurisdiction, it's essential to tailor the clause to local legal standards and consult an attorney to ensure compliance.
Types of Limitations in Limited Liability Clauses
Limited liability clauses can be tailored in various ways to suit the specific risk preferences of the contracting parties. Common types include:
- Monetary caps: These limit the amount one party can recover, often tied to the value of the contract or a fixed sum.
- Exclusion of indirect or consequential damages: These clauses bar claims for non-direct losses such as lost profits or reputational harm.
- Time-based limitations: A clause may specify that any claims must be brought within a certain period following an incident or breach.
- Carve-outs for willful misconduct or gross negligence: These preserve full liability in cases involving serious wrongdoing or intentional harm.
Properly structuring these limitations helps businesses manage risk while maintaining fairness in the agreement.
Indemnity Clauses
Indemnity clauses are written to require an agreement between one or both parties to provide defense and possible financial payments that stem from claims, lawsuits, or judgments. The clause states the ability of one of the parties to the contract to take legal action against another party to the contract, including third parties, for monetary or tangible damages. However, an indemnity clause does not offer full protection of third parties who did not sign a contract.
The clauses, when written by larger companies who have leverage, lean to the favor of the larger company. Smaller companies need to determine if the risk of the clause is outweighed by the financial gain of the contract. The clause language may include the obligation to pay any legal costs or attorney fees.
Depending on the state, the indemnity clause legality will vary. Alaska does not uphold indemnity clauses in regards to construction contracts as seen in City of Dillingham v. CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc., 873 P.2d 1271 (Alaska 1994) because of an existing Alaska anti-indemnity statute. In contrast, California will allow contractors the ability to negotiate liability as it did in Markborough v. Superior Court.
Adding Limited Liability and Indemnity Clauses
Limited liability and indemnity clauses are added as provisions to a contract to protect both parties. Companies that offer services to others can add language to the contract that will set a limit to the total liability they would be responsible for if there is a breach. In general, limited liability clauses protect the vendor that is paid under the contract agreement. Indemnity clauses can benefit either party by assessing the risk associated with any future claims that may occur.
Small businesses looking to contract with larger businesses should review their insurance coverages and limits before deciding to accept indemnity provisions. The cost of high insurance limits and comprehensive insurance may be the catalyst for smaller companies to accept the risk. They may also have to consider the consequences of asking for a limited liability clause that is to their advantage. In this case, they have to expect the other company may see it as a lack of competency so this should be addressed.
When creating a contract with limited liability clauses or indemnity clauses, hiring a lawyer will help confirm the language used is legal and meets state law requirements. A lawyer will also help determine if these clauses are legal in your state. Templates exist that can be used, but may invalidate the contract due to minor language changes.
Common Mistakes to Avoid in Limited Liability Clauses
When drafting limited liability clauses, the following mistakes can lead to unenforceability or costly disputes:
- Failing to define “liability” clearly: Ambiguous terms can be interpreted broadly by courts.
- Using overly broad exclusions: Courts are hesitant to enforce clauses that exclude all liability, especially for serious misconduct.
- Not tailoring to the specific transaction: A one-size-fits-all approach can miss unique risks or obligations inherent in different contracts.
- Ignoring applicable statutes: Some jurisdictions have anti-indemnity or anti-exculpatory laws that override contract terms in certain industries (e.g., construction, consumer goods).
Working with legal counsel to avoid these errors helps strengthen your contract’s enforceability and limits unintended risk exposure.
Drafting and Negotiating a Limited Liability Clause
Drafting an effective limited liability clause involves careful attention to language and context. Consider the following best practices:
- Define the scope of liability: Be specific about what types of claims or damages are covered or excluded.
- Use clear and conspicuous formatting: Make sure the clause stands out, especially in B2C contracts, to avoid claims of surprise.
- Align with insurance policies: Ensure that any caps or exclusions don’t conflict with your professional liability coverage or indemnification responsibilities.
- Anticipate pushback: Some counterparties may seek to narrow or strike the clause entirely. Be prepared to justify its inclusion with reasonable risk assessments.
For businesses entering into high-value or high-risk contracts, negotiating a balanced limited liability clause is essential to safeguarding long-term financial health.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
What is the purpose of a limited liability clause in a contract?
A: It limits the amount a party must pay if something goes wrong, helping manage financial risk in business transactions. -
Are limited liability clauses always enforceable?
A: No. They must be clear, reasonable, and not violate public policy. Courts may reject clauses that exclude liability for fraud or gross negligence. -
Can I limit liability for third-party claims?
A: Often, yes—but it depends on the contract terms and applicable laws. Indemnity clauses may better address third-party claims. -
Is a liability cap the same as an indemnity?
A: No. A liability cap limits how much a party pays, while an indemnity clause shifts responsibility for certain claims or losses to another party. -
Should small businesses include limited liability clauses?
A: Yes, especially to protect against disproportionate legal exposure. But these clauses should be negotiated carefully and reviewed for fairness and legal compliance.
If you need help with understanding the definition of a limited liability clause, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.