Key Takeaways:

  • Common law contracts require four essential components: offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention to create legal relations.
  • Offer and acceptance need clear communication and the offeree's acceptance for a binding agreement.
  • Consideration ensures both parties are exchanging something of value to form a legally enforceable contract.
  • Intention to create legal relations prevents informal agreements from becoming enforceable contracts.
  • The application of common law vs. the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) depends on whether the contract involves goods or services. Common law governs contracts for services and intangible assets, while the UCC applies to contracts involving goods .

Common law contracts are agreements between two or more parties that fall under the common federal and state laws.

Contract Law

A contract is a legal agreement between at least two competent individuals or parties that benefits both sides. Most contracts contain some type of offer that is made by one party and accepted by the other. An agreement can be implied, oral, or written, as well as informal or formal. An example of an implied contract might be in a long-term business relationship.

Some of the most common contract examples include:

  • Rental agreements
  • Leases
  • Promissory notes

In order to qualify as a legal contractual agreement, it must contain four components:

  • An offer
  • Acceptance by the other party of the offer
  • Intent to enter into an agreement with legal repercussions
  • Consideration

Differences Between Common Law and UCC

The common law and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) both govern contracts but differ based on the type of transaction. The common law applies to contracts related to services, real estate, insurance, and intangible assets, whereas the UCC is primarily concerned with transactions involving goods and tangible objects, such as the purchase of a car or computer parts .Understanding when to apply common law versus the UCC can have significant implications in business transactions and litigation. For instance, when a contract involves a mix of goods and services, courts typically lean toward applying the UCC for tangible goods and common law for services. This distinction can influence the terms of the agreement, especially in cases involving modifications, counteroffers, or dispute resolution.

Offer

An offer in a contract is conditional and voluntary, submitted by one party to the other. The party receiving the offer must accept it before a contract exists. An offer is not the same as an invitation to treat. An invitation to treat occurs when a party is seeking to start negotiations but not willing to implement specific terms. Many advertisements and items displayed in stores are invitations to treat, not offers.

Understanding the Role of Offers in Common Law Contracts

In common law contracts, an offer is a formal proposal made by the offeror to the offeree, which can be either express or implied. The key characteristic of an offer is that it demonstrates a willingness to enter into an agreement with clear terms. For example, if a person offers to sell their car for a fixed price, that offer is clear and specific.However, the offer must be communicated to the offeree to be valid. A mere invitation to treat, like an advertisement, is not an offer but a request for negotiation.

Accepting an Offer

After the offer has been extended, the next step toward creating a contract is acceptance of that offer. Acceptance can be communicated in several ways, including in writing, inferred by conduct, or orally. A handshake would be considered an acceptance inferred by conduct. When a party makes a counteroffer, this is not accepting the offer. A counteroffer occurs when one party suggests a different offer in response to the other party, based on what was offered initially.

When a counteroffer is made, this typically serves as a rejection of the first offer. The acceptance then must be made by the party receiving the counteroffer. For example, Jason makes an offer to sell his car to Jane for $600. Jane comes back with a counteroffer of $500 for the car. Jason's original offer of $600 is not valid anymore because the counteroffer serves as a rejection. Jason can now choose to accept Jane's counteroffer of $500 or not.

Acceptance and Counteroffers in Common Law Contracts

Acceptance of an offer must be unconditional, and it must match the terms of the offer exactly. Under common law, any modification or variation to the original offer is considered a counteroffer, which serves as a rejection of the original offer and creates a new offer for consideration.For example, if Party A offers to sell a car for $1,000, and Party B counteroffers with $900, the original offer is no longer valid. Instead, Party A now has the option to accept or reject the counteroffer 【9†source】Add After Heading: Consideration

Consideration

Consideration is the third vital component of a legally enforceable contract. If a contract has consideration, something that is viewed as valuable by both parties is offered within the agreement. The parties must be enticed to enter into the legal agreement in exchange for mutual benefits or performances. In order to qualify as consideration, the contract must have value that can be determined objectively.

Examples of consideration include promises to perform specific tasks, such as fixing a damaged roof, or promises not to perform certain tasks, such as building an addition that would block the view of the neighbor. Regardless of the specifics, consideration in a contract must provide something of value to both parties.

Role of Consideration in Validating Common Law Contracts

Consideration is an essential element that makes a contract legally binding under common law. It refers to the exchange of something of value between the parties involved. This could be money, goods, services, or a promise to do (or not do) something.Consideration must be present for both parties; a promise to gift something without any form of reciprocal exchange is not enforceable. In cases of disputes, courts look to see if the consideration was substantial and whether both parties have given something of value.

Intention

The last required component of a contract is the intention. Both parties must have the intent to enter into a legally binding contractual relationship. This pillar of contract law protects the involved parties since they are choosing to enter into an agreement that creates obligations. Domestic arrangements don't necessarily have the intention to create a relationship that is legally binding. When separated or divorced couples make agreements to divide their property, these actions are exceptions to this rule.

A contract is only legally enforceable and valid if it contains all four of these elements. When drafting contracts, it's critical to make sure all are included.

The growth of online shopping and e-commerce has required some changes to be brought about in contract laws. For example, if a customer wants to buy a computer online from Dell, the contract to purchase that computer would still need to include all four required elements. When viewing the computers available online, these listings are considered invitations to treat. After the customer selects a computer to buy, they would make and accept an offer when they fill in the page with their personal information and payment details. Before completing the purchase, Dell would need to provide the conditions and terms of the purchase contract. The customer must agree to those terms before the contract is in effect.

Intention to Create Legal Relations in Common Law Contracts

One of the key principles in common law contracts is that both parties must have the intention to create a legally binding agreement. This ensures that informal promises, like personal agreements between friends, are not enforced by courts.The intention to create legal relations is typically clear in business contracts but can be implied in certain circumstances. For example, contracts related to employment, property transactions, or sales usually demonstrate clear intent.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary difference between common law contracts and UCC contracts?
    Common law contracts apply to services, real estate, and intangible assets, while UCC contracts govern goods and tangible items.
  2. What makes a common law contract legally binding?
    A common law contract must include offer, acceptance, consideration, and the intention to create legal relations.
  3. Can an offer in a common law contract be revoked?
    Yes, an offer can be revoked anytime before it is accepted unless the offeror has made a firm commitment, such as in an option contract.
  4. How is consideration defined in common law contracts?
    Consideration refers to something of value exchanged between parties, such as money, services, or goods.
  5. Is there a difference in how common law contracts and UCC contracts handle counteroffers?
    Under common law, a counteroffer is treated as a rejection of the original offer. The UCC, however, allows minor changes without rejecting the offer if they do not materially affect the agreement.

If you need help with common law contract, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.