Key Takeaways

  • Anticipatory breach (or anticipatory repudiation) occurs when one party clearly indicates they won’t fulfill their contractual obligations.
  • This breach can be communicated through words, conduct, or circumstances that make performance impossible.
  • The non-breaching party may suspend performance, seek damages, or demand assurance.
  • Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the non-breaching party can withhold performance until reasonable assurance is received.
  • In some cases, a party can retract the anticipatory breach before performance is due if the other party hasn’t yet acted on it.
  • Mitigation is essential: the non-breaching party must act to reduce losses or risk limiting recovery in court.

Anticipatory Breach

An anticipatory breach of contract, also known as an anticipatory repudiation, is when one party in a contract indicates that he or she will not perform this or her contractual obligations. Words or actions can both show that the party will fail to hold up his or her end of the contract as promised. This enables the aggrieved party to claim a breach of contract. In this event, this party can seek damages, suspend his or her part of the contract, or demand reassurance of performance.

What Constitutes an Anticipatory Breach of Contract?

There are several situations that apply to an anticipatory breach of contract. However, the breach must come in a straightforward and clear manner directed at the other party of the contract. It must also be an unconditional and positive refusal made to the other party. This doesn't require vocal or written information but takes place either through actions, direct communication, or any implied communication by the aggrieved party. Some of these situations include:

  • Any action that makes it impossible for a party to hold up his or her contractual obligations.
  • The transfer of property from one of the parties to a third party. This could include a sale, a potential sale, a merger, or anything else that changes the repudiating company's contractual obligations.
  • Refusal to follow through on a contract, whether written, vocalized, or implied.

It's important to note that an expression of doubt isn't always enough to constitute an anticipatory breach of contract. This may still lead to the same actions of the non-breaching party, even if an action, direct communication, or implied communication hasn't taken place. This is because an expression of doubt may still result in a lack of performance or failure to hold up contractual obligations. Like any other type of repudiation, the compliant party may choose to suspend his or her end of the contract, demand reassurance, or begin the process of mitigating damages, monetary or otherwise.

It is up to the contractually compliant party to demand assurance of the contract. However, under the Uniform Commercial Code, he or she may also suspend his or her side of the contract until satisfied with the repudiatory party's performance.

Can Parties Take Back an Anticipatory Breach of Contract?

In some instances, parties can renege on their anticipatory breach of contract. This typically means the repudiating party hasn't made a change in his or her day-to-day operations or lacked a fulfillment of the contract. The party may also take back his or her anticipatory breach of contract if the other party hasn't accepted or claimed a lack of performance or breach of contract. This also includes the breaching party changing his or her stance before the time for performance set out in the contract. Performance refers to any payment or delivery of goods or services.

Legal Consequences of Anticipatory Breach

When an anticipatory breach occurs, the non-breaching party may have several legal remedies available, including:

  • Rescission of the contract: The aggrieved party may treat the contract as terminated and pursue a new agreement or walk away entirely.
  • Damages: Compensation can include expectation damages (loss of expected benefit), reliance damages (costs incurred in preparation), or consequential damages (additional losses stemming from the breach).
  • Specific performance: In rare cases where monetary damages are inadequate (e.g., sale of unique goods or property), a court may order the breaching party to perform as promised.

Whether a claim for damages succeeds depends on proving that the repudiation was unequivocal and that it caused measurable losses.

Mitigation of Losses for the Non-Breaching Party

When an anticipatory breach of contract occurs, the law requires the compliant party to act quickly to avoid potential losses, costs, or expenses that would take place as a result of the failure to fulfill a contract. This is also known as mitigating damages. When the innocent party doesn't try to mitigate damages to their fullest, he or she won't have the ability to get full restitution.

This duty to minimize damages is a basic rule that outlines how much the innocent party can receive if the case goes to court. Any repudiatory act gives the non-breaching party plenty of time to minimize damages in the eyes of the law. If he or she fails to do so, it's his or her own fault. The breaching party isn't held responsible if the other party doesn't take action as soon as possible.

Although the aggrieved party should immediately try to limit his or her losses, some choose to wait. This enables him or her to see whether the other party will actually deliver on his or her repudiation or whether he or she decides to follow through on his or her contractual obligations. This can come from misinterpretations on the part of the non-breaching party. If the repudiating party still follows through, there's no legal recourse that can result. However, the non-breaching party can also choose to suspend his or her own performance, whether payment or something else. This is in accordance with provisions based on the seller's rights.

Anticipatory Breach Under the UCC and Common Law

The treatment of anticipatory breach differs slightly under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and common law:

  • UCC (for sale of goods):
    Under UCC §2-609 and §2-610, when a party has reasonable grounds for insecurity about the other’s performance, they may demand adequate assurance in writing. If no assurance is received within a reasonable time (not exceeding 30 days), the failure to provide it can itself be treated as a repudiation.
  • Common Law:
    Anticipatory repudiation applies more broadly to all types of contracts. A clear and definite refusal to perform, before performance is due, allows the non-breaching party to sue immediately—even if the deadline has not yet passed.

Understanding these nuances can help determine the best course of legal action depending on the type of contract involved.

Examples of Anticipatory Breach in Practice

To better understand how anticipatory breach works, consider the following scenarios:

  1. Supply Chain Disruption:
    A supplier notifies a manufacturer that it will not be able to deliver parts weeks before the delivery date due to a factory closure. The manufacturer may immediately seek an alternate supplier and sue for any cost difference.
  2. Service Contract Abandonment:
    A contractor tells a client a week before work begins that they are taking a different job and will not perform. This allows the client to terminate the contract and seek a replacement without waiting.
  3. Non-Delivery of Unique Goods:
    A seller informs a buyer that they’ve sold a promised unique item to someone else. The buyer can pursue legal recourse for breach, particularly if monetary damages can’t fully make them whole.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is required to prove an anticipatory breach?

The breach must involve a clear, unconditional refusal to perform contractual duties before the due date. It may be expressed in words or inferred from conduct.

2. Can a party withdraw an anticipatory breach?

Yes, but only if the non-breaching party has not yet relied on or accepted the repudiation, and the time for performance has not yet passed.

3. What actions can the non-breaching party take?

They may suspend their own obligations, demand assurance of performance, pursue damages, or treat the contract as terminated.

4. Is a mere expression of doubt about performance a breach?

No. Doubts or vague concerns do not usually qualify. The refusal must be definite and clear.

5. Does the UCC treat anticipatory breach differently?

Yes. Under the UCC, parties may demand adequate assurance of performance and treat silence or insufficient response as repudiation.

If you need help with drafting a buyout agreement, you can post your legal needs on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.