Key Takeaways

  • An anticipatory breach occurs when one party signals they will not fulfill future contract obligations.
  • This breach can be communicated through explicit refusal, conduct, or actions that make performance impossible.
  • The consequences of anticipatory breach of contract may include financial harm, disruption of business operations, and reputational damage.
  • Legal remedies include compensatory damages, punitive damages, and specific performance.
  • A nonbreaching party can seek immediate legal relief without waiting for the contract deadline.

Anticipatory breach of contract cases refer to legal cases that involve the breaching of contracts before the due dates for performance. This type of contract breach occurs when one party to a contract indicates to the other party that he or she cannot or does not wish to fulfill the contract. When faced with an anticipatory breach of contract, a nondefaulting party can terminate the contract and seek compensation by filing a lawsuit against the breaching party. There are several ways to obtain fair compensation in an anticipatory breach case.

What Is an Anticipatory Breach of Contract?

Also known as anticipatory repudiation, anticipatory contract breach happens when one contracting party stops performing his or her contractual obligations, causing the other party to assume he or she does not intend to fulfill his or her part of the agreement. The defaulting party might express this intention through his or her actions or inability or refusal to act, such as:

  • Unwillingness to accept payment.
  • Failure to produce a certain item.
  • Obvious indication of his or her intent not to fulfill the agreement's terms.

An anticipatory breach of contract is more than a mere delay; it must amount to a rejection or repudiation of the contract. When this type of breach occurs, the innocent party can end the contract and take legal action without waiting for the contract to be broken.

If the contract is repudiated, the nondefaulting party can choose how he or she wants to proceed. If it is beneficial to do so, he or she can consider the contract abandoned and sue the offending party for anticipatory contract breach. Alternatively, he or she can wait until the deadline for performance has expired before remedying the contract breach.

What Constitutes an Anticipatory Contract Breach?

An anticipatory breach of contract occurs when:

  • The defaulting party expresses unconditional and positive refusal to the other party: This is known as express repudiation. The refusal must be straightforward, clear, and directed at the innocent party. Making an ambiguous or qualified refusal is not enough. Nonetheless, an expression of doubt might indicate a prospective failure to fulfill the contract, in which case the nonbreaching party might suspend his or her performance and request an assurance of performance from the offending party.
  • The breaching party is unable to perform because of a certain action. Actions are as important as words when it comes to contract repudiation. If the defaulting party's voluntary actions make it impossible for him or her to fulfill the contractual obligations, it is considered a repudiation of the contract.
  • The subject of the contract is transferred to another person. If the contract involves the sale of property, it will be repudiated when the property is transferred to a third party.

Consequences of Anticipatory Breach of Contract

When one party commits an anticipatory breach of contract, the repercussions can be significant for both parties involved. The consequences extend beyond mere financial losses and can impact operations, timelines, and business relationships.

1. Business DisruptionAnticipatory breaches often occur in industries reliant on precise schedules, such as construction or manufacturing. A repudiation can delay project timelines, create logistical challenges, and force the nonbreaching party to seek alternative suppliers or contractors on short notice.

2. Financial LossesThe nondefaulting party may suffer monetary losses due to halted operations, delayed revenue, or the cost of securing substitute performance. These losses form the basis for compensatory damages in litigation.

3. Legal Uncertainty and LitigationIf the breach is not clearly communicated, the innocent party may hesitate to terminate the contract prematurely. In such cases, they may request an "adequate assurance of performance" under UCC § 2-609 (in contracts for the sale of goods) or common law equivalents. Failure to respond adequately can itself be treated as repudiation.

4. Reputational DamagePublic or repeated breaches of contract can damage the defaulting party's reputation, especially in B2B contexts or regulated industries. This may affect future contract negotiations or eligibility for bids.

5. Opportunity CostsThe nonbreaching party may miss out on other business opportunities while trying to salvage or renegotiate the breached agreement.

Remedies for Breach of Contract

In the event of a breach of contract, the court will use one or more of the following remedies to help an innocent party recover his or her losses.

Actual Damages

Also known as compensatory damages, actual damages refer to monetary damages awarded to compensate an innocent party for his or her financial or property losses. The amount of damages awarded will be based on the plaintiff's loss or injury.

Punitive Damages

Punitive damages are monetary damages granted to the nondefaulting party above his or her actual damages. The court might award these damages in cases where the offending party has committed acts that are so reckless and malicious they give a reasonable person pause. Also called exemplary damages, punitive damages are granted to punish the guilty party for outrageous misconduct.

Specific Performance

Specific performance is an equitable remedy the court uses to force a contracting party to perform his or her contractual obligations. In some cases, a nonbreaching party might not be compensated adequately through monetary damages. He or she might request the court to award specific performance instead.

Specific performance can be any action the court orders to compel the defaulting party to provide or perform the exact duties specified in the contract. It is most often awarded in cases involving unique or rare items or something with a value that is hard to determine.

Additional Considerations in Anticipatory Breach Cases

In dealing with anticipatory breach, courts and contracting parties must also consider the following:

  • Mitigation of Damages: The nonbreaching party has a duty to mitigate damages by making reasonable efforts to reduce the harm caused by the breach. Courts may reduce the damages awarded if the plaintiff fails to take reasonable steps.
  • Partial Breach or Retraction: In some cases, a party may repudiate only part of a contract or may later retract the repudiation before the nonbreaching party has relied on it. If accepted, retraction can restore contractual obligations.
  • Injunctions in Unique Situations: Where specific performance is not available, a court may issue an injunction to prevent a party from taking actions that further violate the contract (such as selling unique goods to a third party).
  • Commercial Impracticability: Sometimes, an anticipatory breach results from unforeseen circumstances that make performance impossible or commercially impracticable. In such cases, defenses like force majeure may come into play, although they do not always relieve the breaching party of liability.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is an example of an anticipatory breach of contract?
    If a supplier tells a buyer before the delivery date that they will not ship the agreed goods, this is an anticipatory breach.
  2. Can I sue immediately after an anticipatory breach?
    Yes. Once a party makes it clear they will not fulfill their contractual duties, you can terminate the contract and file a lawsuit without waiting for the performance date.
  3. What if the other party retracts their refusal to perform?
    A repudiation can be retracted if the nonbreaching party hasn’t materially changed position or canceled the contract yet.
  4. Is verbal notice of breach enough?
    Yes, if the verbal notice clearly indicates an intent not to perform. However, written communication is more reliable for legal action.
  5. Are anticipatory breaches treated differently in construction contracts?
    Yes. In construction, early signs of nonperformance (e.g., failure to mobilize or missed milestones) can trigger rights to suspend work or demand performance assurances.

If you need help handling anticipatory breach of contract cases, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.