Key Takeaways

  • Alternative Business Structures (ABS) allow non-lawyers to own or manage law firms, opening the door for external investment and multidisciplinary practices.
  • Advantages for consumers include lower costs, one-stop service convenience, and wider accessibility to legal help.
  • Law firms benefit from funding flexibility, non-lawyer ownership, and expanded service offerings.
  • Disadvantages include potential ethical risks, reduced professional independence, and jurisdictional limitations.
  • The growth of ABS in the U.K. is influencing similar pilot programs in several U.S. states, sparking debate about broader implementation.

The alternative business structures advantages and disadvantages depend on the long-term goals for a business and the state in which it registers. Alternative business structures offer pros and cons, but many newer law firms are choosing this format for their practice.

What Are Alternative Business Structures?

Before 2007, when the Legal Services Act was passed, any solicitor doing business in a legal capacity for the public had to do so in a law firm that solicitors owned. Once the act was passed, Alternative Business Structure (ABS) came onto the scene and allowed both non-solicitors and solicitors to own legal service firms.

If you've obtained an ABS license, you are able to provide legal services as a non-legal organization. This allows law firms to be managed by non-lawyers. ABS structures also allow law firms to offer more that just legal services. Law firms created as ABS can have outside investors, which is one of the biggest draws of this option.

The two main aspects of ABS are:

  • Non-solicitor funding
  • Tesco Law

Tesco law is a law that allows any ABS to offer different services under the same business. There has been a huge growth of co-op legal service firms over the past several years, thanks to this law. An ABS practicing primarily property law could offer mortgages and insurance services, conveyancing, and estate agency as one business, under one roof.

How ABS Works in the U.S. and U.K.

The alternative business structure originated in the U.K. following the Legal Services Act of 2007, revolutionizing the legal market by permitting non-lawyers to co-own and manage law firms. In contrast, most U.S. jurisdictions traditionally prohibit non-lawyer ownership. However, some states have begun testing ABS models. For example:

  • Utah's Regulatory Sandbox allows nontraditional legal service providers to operate under relaxed rules.
  • Arizona has removed its ethics rule barring non-lawyer firm ownership altogether.
  • California, Illinois, and Washington, D.C. have considered or initiated pilot projects examining the ABS model’s impact on access to justice.

These reforms are aimed at improving affordability and access to legal services for underserved populations.

Advantages of ABS for Consumers

There are many advantages to ABS for the consumer. Someone looking for legal services who heads to an ABS-type firm will probably face lower legal costs. If a consumer needs help with a wide variety of things, they might be able to find all of the services they're looking for at one place.

Forming your business as an ABS could be the decision that gives you the edge over your competitors. Clients will likely appreciate the convenience of various services offered, and you'll have the ability to grow with more opportunities for investors.

How ABS Increases Access to Justice

One of the most compelling arguments in favor of the alternative business structure is its potential to enhance access to justice. By enabling non-lawyer investment and management, ABS models can scale more effectively and use innovative service delivery models, such as:

  • Online platforms that offer fixed-fee legal packages.
  • Integrated financial and legal planning services for small businesses or families.
  • Flexible pricing and automation, allowing clients with limited means to afford basic legal assistance.

This approach has shown promise in helping close the "justice gap," especially in areas with a shortage of affordable legal services.

Disadvantages of ABS for Consumers

Some believe that the possible disadvantages of ABS are too much to choose this structure. But many don't find these disadvantages to actually be disadvantageous. Some worry that more ABS firms will drive out smaller firms and lead to less options for consumers.

If a law firm is structured as an ABS, they could run into difficulty trying to expand or provide service overseas. Certain foreign countries do not yet accept ABS. This could be an issue for a consumer who wants to stick with a certain firm as they move overseas or travel.

Ethical and Professional Concerns

Despite its benefits, critics of the alternative business structure model raise valid concerns:

  • Risk of commercial influence: When law firms have external investors, there may be pressure to prioritize profit over client interests.
  • Diminished professional independence: Non-lawyer managers might not uphold the same ethical standards as attorneys, creating potential conflicts of interest.
  • Quality control challenges: Integrating legal and non-legal services under one umbrella requires robust compliance systems to ensure standards are maintained.

These concerns underline the importance of strong regulatory oversight and transparent ethical guidelines in any ABS framework.

Advantages of ABS for Law Firms

Law firms can benefit from choosing to form an ABS for their practice in several ways. As previously mentioned, the ability for ABS firms to offer various services is a huge draw. A firm can market itself as an all-encompassing service provider in a particular area when they're able to cover more bases.

When a law firm forms as a typical business structure, like a professional limited liability company or a corporate law firm, it must be owned by only legal professionals. Corporate law firms may only have solicitors as investors. However, this is not the case with ABS. Employees of the business who are not lawyers can own interest in the company. This could lead to better employee retention and possibly even a better environment throughout the business.

Innovation and Market Reach

ABS firms are often better positioned to innovate and expand due to:

  • Increased access to capital from external investors.
  • Freedom to partner with technology firms, enabling the creation of platforms for virtual consultations, document automation, and customer portals.
  • Enhanced branding and marketing opportunities, since firms can be owned or managed by professionals with diverse business expertise.

This model allows law firms to compete more effectively in a rapidly evolving legal services market.

Disadvantages of ABS for Law Firms

There are a few possible disadvantages that a law firm might face if they choose to form as an ABS. Some worry that, if a firm is run by non-lawyers, it is likely to have legal work handled by non-lawyers. This actually already happens in certain areas of the law. For instance, much of the work involved in conveyance and deed of assignment matters is handled by non-legal professionals. However, ABS firms reserved certain legal activities for only the legal professionals employed there.

Others have shown concern for areas of legal practice that are more competitive with a high turnover rate. They believe there's an opportunity for ABS firms to cut corners in their legal work in order to handle matters more quickly for for lower prices. Again, these disadvantages are only possibilities and can be avoided under proper and honest legal practice.

Regulatory Inconsistencies and Implementation Risks

The adoption of ABS is not uniform across jurisdictions, especially in the United States, where:

  • Some states prohibit ABS outright, making cross-border operations complex.
  • Licensing procedures are still evolving, with sandbox programs offering only temporary or conditional approval.
  • Law firms might face reputational risk if consumers distrust non-lawyer involvement in legal practice.

Firms considering ABS formation must carefully analyze compliance requirements and the regulatory environment in their operating jurisdictions.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is an alternative business structure (ABS)?

An ABS is a legal business model that allows non-lawyers to own or manage law firms, enabling multidisciplinary practices and outside investment.

2. Are ABS firms legal in the U.S.?

ABS firms are not yet widely legal in the U.S., but states like Utah and Arizona have adopted pilot programs or ethical rule changes to allow them.

3. What are the benefits of ABS for consumers?

Consumers gain from lower legal costs, access to bundled services, and the convenience of one-stop legal and non-legal solutions.

4. Do ABS models pose ethical risks?

Yes, there are concerns about conflicts of interest, reduced professional independence, and pressure to prioritize profit over clients.

5. How can law firms transition to an ABS model?

Transitioning involves meeting licensing requirements (if applicable), aligning with ethical rules, and often restructuring ownership or governance models.

If you need help with understanding alternative business structures advantages and disadvantages, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.