Key Takeaways

  • Specific performance is a legal remedy where a court orders a breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations when monetary compensation is insufficient.
  • This remedy is most commonly applied in cases involving unique property or assets, such as real estate transactions.
  • Specific performance can be granted only if other remedies (like monetary damages) are inadequate, and the court considers various factors before granting it.
  • Situational considerations include whether fulfilling the contract would cause undue hardship or is impossible, or if it involves services rather than tangible property.

Specific performance cases are legal cases in which a party is required to fulfill his or her contractual obligations to resolve a breach of contract. Specific performance is one of the options available when monetary compensation is not sufficient to put the plaintiff in the same position as he or she would have been if the breach did not occur. It can come in the form of any forced action but usually involves performing previously agreed-upon tasks. This type of remedy is often used in cases that involve a unique object or piece of property.

What Is Specific Performance?

When a party fails to meet his or her contractual obligations, the other party might consider using one of several legal remedies. If a monetary remedy does not make the non-defaulting party whole, the court can order the breaching party to perform his or her contractual duties as originally promised. This kind of remedy is known as specific performance. As an alternative to awarding damages, specific performance commonly serves as injunctive relief in legal cases related to real estate or the disclosure of confidential information.

Legal Precedents and Case Examples in Specific Performance

In legal history, numerous cases have set precedents for how specific performance is applied. One of the most notable cases is Jade Trading, LLC v. Monroe Street Associates, where the court enforced a contract for the sale of real estate because the land in question was considered irreplaceable. Courts typically rely on similar precedents to decide whether the subject matter of the contract is unique or if a substitute is readily available.

Another significant case is Van Wagner v. S&M Enterprises, Inc., where the court awarded specific performance to enforce the sale of a unique sculpture because the subject matter was considered unique. These cases help demonstrate that specific performance is most often used in situations where there is no easy substitute for the contract subject.

When Should Specific Performance Be Used?

Specific performance is a specialized remedy the court uses when all other remedies, including monetary compensation, cannot compensate the plaintiff adequately. If there is a legal remedy that provides adequate compensation, the court will use that remedy instead. Usually, the court will grant specific performance under one of the following circumstances:

  • The contract's subject matter is unique.
  • It is not just a matter of money.
  • The amount of damages cannot be clearly determined.

For instance, if a contract involves the sale of a unique object or property, monetary damages alone might not remedy the buyer's situation. Specific performance is often used in real estate transactions because every piece of land has unique characteristics, such as location, pre-existing structures, natural resources, and others. These unique qualities are considerations that the buyer and seller must make when they are pricing the land, negotiating the price, and agreeing on the final price.

Unique Cases Where Specific Performance Is Applied

Specific performance is typically sought when there is no adequate remedy at law due to the uniqueness of the contract's subject. For instance:

  • Real Estate Transactions: Property transactions often involve unique pieces of land or properties that cannot be substituted, making monetary damages inadequate. Courts frequently grant specific performance in these cases, such as when a buyer wants a particular piece of property that cannot be replicated.
  • Rare or Unique Items: If the contract involves the sale of rare items such as collectibles, rare artwork, or antique pieces, courts may order the breaching party to transfer ownership of the specific item rather than awarding monetary compensation.
  • Intellectual Property Agreements: In some cases involving intellectual property, where the breach cannot be easily compensated with money (for example, non-disclosure agreements involving confidential patents), the court may enforce specific performance to ensure that the terms of the contract are honored.

Situational Considerations in Granting Specific Performance

Think strategically before requesting a specific performance remedy. Whether you wish to obtain an injunction or seek monetary compensation, it can be costly to bring a case before the court. It's possible that the other party did not fulfill the contract because he or she was truly unable to. Say, for example, a fire at the party's production facility reduced or eliminated his or her capacity to produce the promised goods. In such a situation, going to court might cause you to lose money without getting the result you wanted.

The court tends to take a harder stance on specific performance. Its decision will be based on the concept of equity, meaning it will award specific performance only if monetary compensation will not solve the problem. Similar to injunctions, the court does not have to order specific performance in all civil law cases. Instead, it must consider the individual factors in a case to determine if specific performance is an appropriate remedy. There is no guarantee that the court will award specific performance.

In many situations, specific performance does not adequately compensate the innocent party for his or her loss or injury. Under such a circumstance, the court will rarely award specific performance, even if monetary damages are not an adequate compensation. It will avoid specific performance when:

  • It is impossible to grant specific performance.
  • Specific performance will cause severe harm to the breaching party.
  • Specific performance will be supervised constantly.
  • The contract is unconscionable.
  • The contract is for the provision of services.
  • It is stated in the contract that either party can terminate the agreement at will.
  • The plaintiff has failed to meet his or her contractual obligations.

The court usually prefers to award monetary damages whenever possible because it is easier to enforce and does not require the defendant to perform a task that he or she is reluctant to do. If the court orders specific performance, the defendant might face multiple consequences, such as a contempt charge or a heavy fine, if he or she refuses to fulfill the order.

Factors Influencing Specific Performance Cases

While specific performance is a potent legal tool, it is not granted in every situation. Courts weigh several factors when deciding whether to grant this remedy:

Feasibility: The court considers whether it is practically possible to enforce the terms of the contract. If performance would be impossible, such as when the subject matter no longer exists, specific performance will not be granted.

Hardship on the Breaching Party: If enforcing specific performance would place an undue burden on the breaching party, such as causing financial ruin or requiring constant supervision, courts are less likely to enforce it.

Equitable Principles: The court will also consider fairness and whether granting specific performance would be equitable under the circumstances. For example, if one party has not performed their contractual duties or if the contract is deemed unfair, specific performance may be denied.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What types of contracts can be subject to specific performance?
    Specific performance is often applied in contracts involving unique goods, real estate, rare items, or intellectual property. Courts enforce this remedy when no equivalent substitute can compensate the non-breaching party.
  2. What are the common examples of specific performance in court?
    Common cases include the sale of real estate, rare collectibles, and situations where intellectual property agreements are breached. Courts tend to enforce specific performance when the subject matter is irreplaceable.
  3. When will a court deny specific performance?
    A court may deny specific performance if the subject matter is impossible to perform, if enforcing the contract would create excessive hardship, or if the contract is deemed unconscionable.
  4. How does specific performance compare to monetary damages?
    Specific performance is ordered when monetary damages are insufficient to compensate the plaintiff, often due to the uniqueness of the subject matter of the contract.
  5. Can specific performance be applied to service contracts?
    Specific performance is generally not applied to contracts for services, as forcing someone to perform personal services is seen as impractical and potentially unfair.

If you need help with specific performance cases, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.