Key Takeaways:

  • Quasi-public corporations operate with private management but fulfill public functions, often with government oversight or funding.
  • These entities may originate at federal, state, or local levels and are not limited to state government control.
  • They serve specific public needs—like utilities or infrastructure—while enjoying more flexibility than traditional government agencies.
  • Oversight varies by jurisdiction and may include accountability gaps, prompting recent legislative reforms.
  • Quasi-public corporations often provide quasi-public goods such as roads, water, and energy.

When a corporation is quasi private, it means that it operates in the public sector but also receives backing from the government. The branch of government that supports a quasi-private organization is usually mandated to provide some type of service to the public.

What Are Quasi-Private Corporations?

When a branch of the government provides backing to a corporation in the private sector, this corporation is known as quasi-private. Although these corporations do operate in the private sector, they are linked to the federal government in some way. Executives and managers in these companies, however, do not work for the government.

In general, a quasi-private corporation was once a government agency but has since transitioned into a separate private industry. Sometimes, these companies will trade their shares on stock exchanges. A quasi-private corporation is a type of public-purpose corporation.

Both of these corporations are created to serve the public, with the main difference being that quasi-private corporations are not operated by the government. They do, however, have a mission that's chartered by the government and receives government funding. Unlike traditional corporations, creating value for shareholders is not the main purpose of a quasi-private corporation. Instead, its main goal is to fulfill their public purpose.

These corporations are meant to benefit the general public by improving its convenience, welfare, or comfort.

Quasi-private corporations can come in many different forms:

  • Telephone companies
  • Energy companies, including electric, oil, and gas
  • Water companies

Commonly, these corporations are called public service corporations. Many of these corporations are considered important tools for public policy, as they can usually be operated more cost effectively than full public companies. In addition, quasi-private corporations are generally subject to fewer restrictions than public companies.

Investing in quasi-private companies is considered very low risk due to the assumption that the government will not allow these companies to fail. That being said, these companies must put its public mission ahead of the interests of its stockholders.

When a public-private corporation receives funding from the government, these funds are usually meant to cover ongoing losses. Typically, public-private corporations experience losses because they charge much lower prices than would be charged by a strictly private corporation.

Are Quasi-Public Corporations Operated Only by State Governments?

Quasi-public corporations are not exclusively operated by state governments. These hybrid entities can be established at various government levels—federal, state, or local—to fulfill public purposes through private sector methods. While the term often refers to state-linked organizations, many federal examples exist, such as Amtrak and the U.S. Postal Service, which operate independently but are chartered or funded by the federal government.

State and municipal governments frequently create quasi-public corporations to manage public functions like transportation infrastructure, housing finance, or economic development. Examples include the Connecticut Lottery Corporation and the Utah Transit Authority. Though government-affiliated, these corporations often fall outside the full scope of government transparency and oversight rules, which has led to scrutiny and reform efforts in several states.

Their operational independence allows them to act with the efficiency of private businesses, but their public mission typically remains central. They may also engage in profit-generating activities, but these profits are generally reinvested to further their public goals rather than distributed to shareholders.

Characteristics of Quasi-Public Corporations

While quasi-private and quasi-public corporations are closely related, the term "quasi-public" emphasizes the public-serving role of such entities, even if they operate under private management. Key features of quasi-public corporations include:

  • Government Charter or Sponsorship: They are created by legislation or public initiative, often to provide services that neither the private market nor public agencies alone can efficiently offer.
  • Operational Independence: They are managed privately, enabling quicker decision-making and cost efficiency.
  • Public Accountability (Variable): Depending on the jurisdiction, quasi-public corporations may not be subject to the same open records or ethics laws as direct government bodies, though some states are increasing oversight.
  • Public Purpose Priority: Their core function is to serve public interests—such as affordable housing, public transit, or clean energy—not profit maximization.
  • Funding: They may be supported through government grants, bond issuance, or revenue from services, rather than taxation alone.

This structure is particularly useful for infrastructure development, public health initiatives, or financial support services where full government control is impractical or too slow to adapt.

Quasi-Public Goods

A quasi-public good will usually share characteristics with goods in both the public and private sector, including:

  • Partial diminishability
  • Partial excludability
  • Partial rejectability
  • Partial rivalry

Roads and bridges could both be considered quasi-public goods. Because quasi-public goods are typically not subject to the free market, they are usually considered to be very inefficient. For instance, it would be possible for a private company to build roads if they had the ability to cover these costs by charging drivers.

The problem is that it would be unlikely that private companies could fully meet the public's infrastructure and transportation demands with such a system. Toll roads, for example, are extremely inefficient because drivers must slow their vehicles to pay the toll, resulting in traffic congestion that would not exist if the toll system was not in place.

It's possible that new technology could help to solve these different problems. Over time, new technology may make it possible to transition quasi-public goods into completely private goods.

Laws That Apply to Entities

Based on the Freedom of Information Act, agencies are required to make some records publicly available for examination. Certain exceptions to this rule are in place. For example, government bodies such as Congress are exempt from the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act. Rules at the state level determine what state offices are required to disclose their records.

Before requesting records from a government office, you should check to make sure that they are subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The President, including his advisors and staff, are exempt from these disclosure requirements. The Office of Management and the Executive Office of the President, however, are subject to these rules.

Other parts of the executive branch, including cabinet offices, are also required to make their records subject to public inspection. This includes:

  • The Department of Justice
  • The Department of Homeland Security
  • The Department of Treasury

Oversight and Accountability of Quasi-Public Corporations

Despite their public function, quasi-public corporations have sometimes operated with minimal oversight, creating concerns about transparency, fiscal responsibility, and ethical governance. In response, several states have enacted reforms to increase accountability. Common issues include:

  • Lack of Public Scrutiny: Many quasi-public entities are not held to the same Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or open meeting laws as state agencies.
  • Financial Irregularities: Cases of embezzlement and misuse of public funds have spurred legislative changes.
  • New Reporting Requirements: States like Connecticut and Utah have implemented stricter audits, ethics training, and financial disclosures to monitor performance more closely.

These measures aim to ensure that quasi-public entities meet their intended public purpose while maintaining trust and financial integrity.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Is a "quasi-public corporation" operated only by state governments?
    No. Quasi-public corporations can be chartered by federal, state, or local governments. They are not limited to state operation.
  2. What’s the main purpose of a quasi-public corporation?
    Its primary goal is to fulfill a public mission, such as providing utilities, transportation, or housing, rather than to generate profit for shareholders.
  3. Do quasi-public corporations follow the same transparency laws as government agencies?
    Not always. Their level of accountability depends on the jurisdiction. Some may be exempt from open records laws, though oversight is increasing.
  4. Are quasi-public corporations considered low-risk for investors?
    Generally, yes—due to assumed government backing. However, this varies based on the specific corporation’s structure and funding.
  5. Can quasi-public corporations become fully private?
    In some cases, yes. If public needs shift or privatization is deemed more efficient, these entities may transition into fully private corporations.

If you need help understanding the meaning of quasi-private, you can post your legal needs on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.