Quasi Contract Rules, Requirements, and Legal Implications

Key Takeaways

• A quasi contract is a legal remedy used to prevent unjust enrichment when no formal contract exists.
• It is not an actual contract but is imposed by courts to ensure fairness.
• To claim relief, elements such as a benefit conferred and knowledge of that benefit must be present.
• Courts can order restitution or quantum meruit damages under quasi contract claims.
• Common quasi-contract scenarios include overpayments, mistaken deliveries, and emergency services.
• Quasi contracts differ significantly from express or implied contracts, particularly in formation and enforceability.

The rules regarding quasi-contract govern a contract created by the court for the purpose of equal treatment when two parties are involved in a dispute in which no official agreement exists. The quasi-contract is designed to prevent either party from being unjustly enriched. This is not a legally binding document, but a legal method to impose equity in a dispute used when a contract should have been formed. While an actual contract is often required for a remedy to be sought in court, in some cases a quasi-contract may be sufficient for a party to seek restitution.

Elements of a Quasi-Contract

The three fundamental elements of a quasi-contract include the following:

• The plaintiff must have provided specific services or valuable goods with a reasonable expectation of being compensated.
• The defendant must have gotten a direct benefit from knowingly accepting these goods and services.
• These benefits must be regarded as unfair because no compensation was rendered.

With a legally binding contract, both parties enter the agreement with the intention to make it legally binding prior to exchanging goods or services. With a quasi-contract, one of the parties does not have intent; however, despite the lack of mutual assent, the court has created a quasi-contract to prevent one party from being unfairly enriched. In most cases, damages do not exceed materials and labor costs.

Use of a quasi-contract structure dates to the Middle Ages, when it was called Indebitatus assumpsit. It was used to make one party pay for the product or service as if a contract existed to provide restitution, quite similar to the way the modern quasi-contract is used.

Common Examples of Quasi Contracts

Quasi contracts frequently arise in situations where one party receives a benefit without a formal agreement. Common examples include:

• Mistaken Overpayment: If a person accidentally pays money to the wrong recipient, the court may impose a quasi contract to compel repayment.
• Unrequested Services Rendered: When someone performs services during an emergency (e.g., medical aid) without expecting compensation, the court may still award payment based on fairness.
• Wrongful Receipt of Goods: If a party receives goods or services by mistake and retains them, a quasi contract may require reimbursement.
• Construction Work on the Wrong Property: A contractor who builds on the wrong lot may recover costs if the property owner knowingly benefited without payment.

These examples illustrate how courts use quasi contracts to correct imbalances and ensure no one benefits unfairly at another’s expense.

Unjust Enrichment

An unfair benefit, either received by chance or because of the misfortune of another, is legally considered unjust enrichment. This means the party has not earned or paid for the benefit and thus is under an ethical and moral obligation to return it.

To prove unjust enrichment, the three elements above must be present — along with two additional elements:

• No explanation exists for the enrichment and associated disadvantage.
• No legal remedy is available to the plaintiff.

Restitution is the typical legal remedy for unjust enrichment. This means the plaintiff will be compensated for the benefit he or she provided, whether by cash value or by returning the item in question.

Quasi-Contract Requirements

Judges can only establish a quasi-contract in certain instances. The plaintiff must have given the defendant a tangible product or service with the reasonable expectation of receiving payment in return. The plaintiff must also provide information about how he or she has been injured and the defendant unjustly enriched. In most cases, the defendant will be ordered by the court to pay the defendant quantum meruit: restitution to the extent that he or she was unjustly enriched. This resolves the dispute.

Distinguishing Quasi Contracts from Other Contracts

Quasi contracts differ fundamentally from express and implied-in-fact contracts. Key differences include:

Understanding these distinctions is essential in identifying the correct legal approach in dispute resolution.

Quasi-Contract Recovery

This occurs when a plaintiff must be justly compensated even in absence of a contract, if the contract existed but was unenforceable, or a benefit was conferred to the other party without fulfillment of an existing contract. The defendant must have made an express or implied request for this benefit. Quasi-contract recovery is rare in cases in which a contract has been willfully breached, unless the contract in question is for employment.

A buyer who has breached can recover payments made in excess of a liquidated damages clause. If no such clause exists, the individual can recover the lesser of $500 or 20 percent of the contract price. This will be offset by seller damages.

Remedies Available Under Quasi Contracts

Courts typically grant restitutionary remedies in quasi contract cases. These may include:

• Restitution: Returning the value of the benefit received to the party who conferred it.
• Quantum Meruit: A reasonable payment for services rendered, even without a formal contract.
• Constructive Trusts: In equity cases, courts may impose a trust on wrongfully obtained property.
• Specific Reimbursement: In overpayment or accidental benefit cases, exact sums may be ordered returned.

These remedies are designed to restore parties to their prior position and deter exploitation without requiring proof of contractual obligations.

Related Legal Terms and Issues

Other legal terms it's important to understand associated with quasi-contracts include:

• Appellate court: One with jurisdiction to review lower court decisions.
• Contract: A legally binding agreement in which a promise is made between two or more parties to provide or do something of value in exchange for a tangible benefit.
• Defendant: The person or entity against whom a civil court lawsuit has been filed or who is charged with an offense or a crime.
• Plaintiff: A person who sues another in civil court or criminal proceedings.
• Remedy: The penalty imposed or right enforced by the court in a lawsuit.

When Courts Impose Quasi Contracts

Courts typically impose quasi contracts when:

• A benefit was conferred on the defendant.
• The defendant knowingly accepted or retained the benefit.
• It would be inequitable for the defendant to retain the benefit without payment.
• No enforceable contract exists between the parties.

These conditions reflect the equitable nature of quasi contract law—courts intervene not to enforce promises, but to enforce fairness. Cases involving emergency medical care, public utility usage, or property improvements often fall into this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the legal purpose of a quasi contract?
   A quasi contract ensures fairness by preventing one party from being unjustly enriched at another's expense when no actual contract exists.
2. Is a quasi contract legally enforceable?
   Yes, it is enforceable in court as an equitable remedy, even though it is not a true contract formed by agreement.
3. What’s the difference between a quasi contract and an implied contract?
   A quasi contract is imposed by law, while an implied-in-fact contract arises from the parties’ conduct suggesting mutual intent.
4. Can I sue someone under a quasi contract?
   Yes, if you've conferred a benefit without compensation and no legal agreement exists, you may have a quasi contract claim.
5. What damages are available under a quasi contract?
   Courts may award restitution or compensation based on the value of the benefit conferred (quantum meruit).

If you need help with rules regarding quasi-contract, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.