Key Takeaways

  • Asbestos litigation relies on clearly defined medical criteria and disease levels, ranging from non-malignant to malignant conditions.
  • Non-malignant levels (I–V) cover pleural plaques, thickening, calcification, and asbestosis, with increasing impairment measured by pulmonary function tests.
  • Malignant levels (VI–IX) include cancers like colorectal, laryngeal, esophageal, lung cancer, and mesothelioma, each requiring diagnostic evidence and weighted occupational exposure.
  • Exceptional medical claims allow cases that don’t fit rigid criteria but can demonstrate asbestos causation through reliable alternative evidence.
  • Claimants exposed to naturally occurring asbestos may also qualify for compensation under exceptional claim provisions.
  • Courts and trusts use these levels to balance fair compensation, prevent fraudulent claims, and prioritize the most serious cases.
  • Asbestos litigation continues to evolve, shaped by landmark lawsuits, medical research, and legislative reforms.

Non-Malignant Conditions

For non-malignant conditions (Levels I to V), the medical criteria generally require a diagnosis of bilateral pleural plaques or thickening, bilateral pleural calcification, diffuse pleural thickening, bilateral pleural disease of grade B2, or asbestosis based on X-ray readings or pathology. Level II includes claimants with mixed obstructive and restrictive disease based on pulmonary function testing and supporting medical documentation, such as a written opinion by the examining or diagnosing physician according to diagnostic guidelines establishing that asbestos exposure was a contributing factor to the disease. Mild, moderate and severe impairment is required for Levels III, IV, and V, respectively, based on pulmonary function test results and supporting medical documentation, such as a written opinion by the examining or diagnosing physician according to diagnostic guidelines establishing that the claimant's asbestos exposure is a substantial contributing factor in causing the pulmonary condition in question. Level I requires five years cumulative occupational exposure, while Levels II through V require five years substantial occupational exposure weighted based on time and industry (“weighted years”).

Diagnosis and Testing Requirements

Medical criteria for non-malignant asbestos-related diseases often depend on a combination of radiographic evidence, pathology reports, and pulmonary function testing. Courts and asbestos trust funds typically require:

  • Chest X-rays or CT scans interpreted under standardized guidelines (e.g., ILO classifications) to confirm pleural plaques or asbestosis.
  • Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) documenting restrictive or mixed obstructive/restrictive patterns that correlate with exposure history.
  • Occupational history records, including employment in high-risk industries like construction, shipbuilding, or mining, to establish causation.
  • Latency periods are also significant—most non-malignant conditions develop decades after exposure, making medical documentation critical to meet lectl medical criteria and disease levels for asbestos litigation.

Malignant Conditions

For malignant conditions (Levels VI to IX), the medical criteria require a diagnosis of mesothelioma, primary lung cancer, or other cancer.

Level VI (other cancers) claims include:

  1. A diagnosis of primary colorectal, laryngeal, esophageal, pharyngeal, or stomach cancer.
  2. Evidence of a bilateral asbestos-related nonmalignant disease.
  3. Fifteen weighted years of exposure to asbestos.
  4. Supporting medical documentation, such as a written opinion by the examining or diagnosing physician according to diagnostic guidelines establishing that the claimant's exposure to asbestos was a substantial contributing factor in causing the claimant's other cancer.

Level VII claims must include:

  1. A diagnosis of primary lung cancer.
  2. Evidence of bilateral pleural plaques, thickening, or calcification as established by chest x-ray or any such diagnostic methodology supported by the findings of the Institute of Medicine.
  3. Evidence of twelve or more weighted years of substantial occupational exposure.
  4. Medical documentation, such as a written opinion by the examining or diagnosing physician according to diagnostic guidelines, establishing asbestos exposure as a substantial contributing factor in causing the cancer.

Level VIII claims must include:

  1. A diagnosis of a primary lung cancer disease.
  2. Evidence of asbestosis based on a chest x-ray showing irregular opacities and the relevant weighted years of exposure.
  3. Supporting medical documentation, such as a written opinion by the examining or diagnosing physician according to diagnostic guidelines establishing that the claimants exposure to asbestos for ten or more weighted years was a substantial contributing factor in causing the claimant's cancer.

Level IX claims shall include:

  1. A diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.
  2. Credible evidence resulting from occupational, take home, or other identifiable exposure to asbestos.

Diagnosis of all of the malignant disease levels must be made by a board-certified pathologist.

Mesothelioma and Cancer Litigation Trends

Mesothelioma remains the most severe asbestos-related disease and is classified as Level IX in asbestos claims. Unlike other cancers, no minimum exposure duration is typically required because even brief asbestos exposure can cause the disease. Litigation trends show:

  • High compensation values for mesothelioma due to its terminal nature and strong link to asbestos exposure.
  • Expansion of eligible cancers beyond lung cancer to include laryngeal, esophageal, colorectal, and stomach cancers, provided there is supporting evidence of asbestos causation.
  • Burden of proof requiring board-certified pathologists and, in some jurisdictions, corroboration from multiple diagnostic tests.
  • Courts often emphasize weighted years of exposure and evidence of non-malignant asbestos disease to confirm asbestos as a substantial contributing factor.

Exceptional Medical Claims

This allows a claimant to have a claim designated an exceptional medical claim if the claim does not meet the medical criteria requirements of the bill or has been found ineligible for compensation based on the failure to meet the medical criteria only. The claimant must provide a report from a physician meeting the requirements of this section which includes:

  1. A complete review of the claimant's medical history and current condition.
  2. Additional material as required by the Administrator.
  3. A detailed explanation as to why the claim meets the standard for designating exceptional medical claims.

A Physicians Panel shall review all applications for designation as an exceptional medical claim. For the claim to receive treatment as an exceptional medical claim, a Physicians Panel must find that the claimant cannot meet the requirements for reasons beyond the individual's control, but can through comparably reliable evidence establish a condition similar to one that would satisfy the requirements. In reaching its determination, a Physicians Panel may request additional reasonable testing. Further, the claimant may submit CT scans in addition to an x-ray.

If a Physicians Panel certifies a claim as an exceptional medical claim, it must designate the disease category for which the claimant may seek compensation and refer the claim to the Administrator for a determination on eligibility on the remaining diagnostic, latency and exposure requirements. In making this determination, the Administrator shall give due consideration to the recommendation of the Physicians Panel. If a Physicians Panel denies claimant's application for designation as an exceptional medical claim, then the claimant may resubmit application based on new evidence, specifying the new evidence that serves as the basis of the resubmission.

Legal and Compensation Considerations

Exceptional claims provide flexibility for individuals who cannot meet rigid medical criteria but can prove asbestos causation by other reliable means. Examples include:

  • Claimants with rare conditions linked to asbestos where no formal disease level exists.
  • Veterans and workers from legacy industries where exposure records may be incomplete, but circumstantial evidence supports asbestos contact.
  • Use of advanced diagnostic tools, such as high-resolution CT scans, when X-rays are inconclusive.
  • Compensation administrators consider these claims carefully to ensure fairness while discouraging abuse of the system. In practice, exceptional claims recognize that rigid medical thresholds cannot account for every valid asbestos-related illness.

Naturally Occurring Asbestos

Claimants exposed to naturally occurring asbestos may file and seek designation as an exceptional medical claim.

Historical Context of Asbestos Litigation

The framework for asbestos disease levels and compensation developed over decades of litigation. Key milestones include:

  • Early lawsuits in the 1970s and 1980s, which exposed the dangers of asbestos and established employer liability.
  • Creation of asbestos bankruptcy trusts, which adopted medical and exposure criteria to standardize compensation and protect funds from depletion.
  • Landmark cases that expanded recognition of asbestos-related cancers beyond mesothelioma.
  • Ongoing debates over medical criteria, balancing fairness to victims with the need to prevent fraudulent or unsupported claims.

Understanding this history helps explain why modern lectl medical criteria and disease levels for asbestos litigation emphasize both objective medical evidence and fair exposure-based thresholds.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are the main disease levels in asbestos litigation?
    Levels I–V cover non-malignant conditions like pleural plaques and asbestosis, while Levels VI–IX apply to cancers such as lung cancer and mesothelioma.
  2. How are asbestos-related diseases diagnosed for legal claims?
    Diagnosis usually requires chest imaging, pulmonary function tests, and a physician’s opinion linking asbestos exposure as a contributing factor.
  3. What makes mesothelioma claims unique?
    Mesothelioma claims do not require long-term exposure evidence, since even minimal exposure is medically linked to the disease.
  4. Can someone file a claim if they don’t meet standard medical criteria?
    Yes. Exceptional medical claims allow compensation when reliable alternative evidence proves asbestos-related illness.
  5. Why are weighted years of exposure important?
    They account for both the duration and intensity of asbestos exposure, helping establish a fair link between exposure history and disease.

If you need help identifying lectl medical criteria and disease levels for asbestos litigation, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel’s marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.