Key Takeaways

  • Equitable defenses are legal arguments used to prevent a party from enforcing a claim due to fairness-related concerns.
  • These defenses were historically used in courts of equity but are now available in legal proceedings where equitable relief is sought.
  • Common equitable defenses include mistake, fraud, estoppel, laches, illegality, unclean hands, and undue influence.
  • Breach of contract cases frequently involve equitable defenses, particularly laches and unclean hands.
  • Equitable defenses in fiduciary litigation arise when trustees or fiduciaries are sued, often involving waiver, estoppel, and laches.
  • Courts evaluate equitable defenses case by case, often requiring clear evidence of misconduct, unfair delay, or unconscionability.
  • Equitable remedies, such as specific performance and contract rescission, are denied if a valid equitable defense exists.
  • Seeking legal counsel is critical for navigating the complexities of equitable defenses in contract and fiduciary disputes.

Equitable defenses are usually brought to court as an affirmative defense. The court is asked to excuse an act of the party bringing the cause of action due to their actions that are considered inequitable.

Information About Equitable Defenses

At one time, equitable defenses were only applied in a court of equity, but the defense is now used in a court of law. In the U.S., equitable defenses are available when the remedy sought is "at law".

In its broadest sense, equity is fairness. Examples of equitable defenses to address fairness include:

  • Mistake
  • Fraud
  • Estoppel
  • Laches
  • Forum non conveniens
  • Illegality
  • Failure of consideration
  • Unclean hands

Mistakes

There are situations where mistakes in the terms of the contract can prevent recovery/remedy for a party. Recovery may be limited depending on if the mistake was mutual or only one party was mistaken.

Laches

This is when the non-breaching party intentionally delays bringing forth a lawsuit for breach of contract resulting in prejudice to the breaching party.

Illegal Contract

This type of contract cannot be enforced under legal or equitable principles. This would include contracts for drug distribution, prostitution, gambling, or other illegal acts.

Unclean Hands

The non-breaching party and the breaching party have both committed the same type of breach. Under the principles of equitable defense, the party claiming relief cannot be in violation of the terms of the contract.

Hardship

Equitable remedies will not be issued if doing so results in an undue hardship to the breaching party.

Unconscionable Contract

A remedy is not possible if the contract is deemed unconscionable, which means the agreement is one-sided and unfair for one of the parties.

Misrepresentation

If a contract is made and fraud, lying, or deceit were involved, the contract may not be enforceable due to conditions of misrepresentation.

Undue Influence

If there is any evidence that undue influence was used in creating a contract, equitable relief may not be possible. One party using their position of authority to take advantage of the other party is considered undue influence.

Duress

Duress is similar to undue influence in that someone feels pressured into doing something. Duress takes it a step further and involves threats or physical harm to one's self or to loved ones.

The two most common equitable defenses are unclean hands and laches.

An important point is that a party who is considering seeking equitable remedy must make sure they have a clean record and have not violated the law.

Another point to consider is that the area of equitable defenses is a complex. An example would be that the defenses used in regard to the performance of a contract may be different from the defenses used for contract rescission. For this reason, it is recommended that a lawyer is consulted to determine if an equitable defense is possible.

In the event a breach of contract is brought, it is best to contact a lawyer as soon as possible to advise you of both legal and equitable remedies that may be available.

An attorney experienced in contract law will explain how equitable defenses work and if they will apply to your situation.

Equitable Defenses in Fiduciary Duty Litigation

Equitable defenses are also critical in fiduciary duty disputes, particularly when beneficiaries bring claims against trustees, executors, or financial managers. Some commonly used equitable defenses include:

  • Waiver – If the beneficiary knowingly allowed or consented to the fiduciary’s actions but later raised objections.
  • Laches – If a beneficiary unreasonably delayed asserting their rights, making it unfair to pursue the claim.
  • Estoppel – If the beneficiary’s prior conduct suggests they accepted the fiduciary’s decisions.

Courts evaluate whether beneficiaries had prior knowledge of fiduciary actions and if they acted in a timely manner when challenging fiduciary conduct.

Equitable Defenses in Breach of Contract Cases

Equitable defenses frequently arise in breach of contract disputes, particularly where one party seeks non-monetary remedies like specific performance. A court may deny enforcement of a contract or certain obligations if an equitable defense is successfully proven. Some common applications include:

  • Laches – If the non-breaching party delayed enforcing their rights, causing prejudice to the other party.
  • Unclean Hands – If both parties engaged in misconduct, the court may refuse to grant relief.
  • Estoppel – If the non-breaching party previously accepted the conduct they now claim constitutes a breach.
  • Failure of Consideration – If one party fails to provide the promised value under the contract, equitable remedies may be denied.

In such cases, the court examines good faith, fairness, and the conduct of both parties when determining whether equitable defenses should be upheld.

About Equitable Remedies

Equitable relief is not available if the party that violated the contract has a valid defense for breaching the contract. This constitutes an equitable defense, which prevents the non-breaching party from receiving equitable relief.

When a breach of contract occurs, and a suit is filed, equitable remedies are issued when legal remedies, such as monetary damages, cannot adequately resolve the breach.

Equitable relief usually comes by way of the parties taking certain actions, which, in turn, serve to remedy the breach of contract. Equitable relief does not provide monetary compensation.

There are several common equitable remedies. These include:

  • Specific performance. This requires the party who breached the contract to fulfill the obligations specified in the contract.
  • Contract reformation. This remedy rewrites or revises the existing contract to outline, more clearly, the demands of the parties involved.
  • Contract rescission. This remedy cancels the existing contract and replaces it with a new one.

Courts have a significant level of discretion and a variety of factors at their disposal when determining whether equitable relief is appropriate.

Limitations on Equitable Relief Due to Defenses

When a party asserts an equitable defense, it can prevent the court from granting equitable remedies such as contract rescission or specific performance. Courts may deny equitable relief if:

  • The claimant also acted unfairly (unclean hands).
  • The claim is barred by excessive delay (laches).
  • The contract itself is deemed unconscionable or unfair.
  • The defendant reasonably relied on the plaintiff’s prior statements or actions (estoppel).

Courts assess equitable defenses on a case-by-case basis, weighing the interests of both parties before granting or denying relief.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are the most common equitable defenses?
    The most common equitable defenses include laches, unclean hands, estoppel, undue influence, and illegality. These defenses are used to argue that enforcing a claim would be unfair due to the plaintiff's conduct or excessive delay.
  2. Can equitable defenses be used in any type of legal case?
    Equitable defenses are typically used in cases involving contracts, fiduciary duty disputes, and other situations where fairness is a key concern. They are most effective in cases where monetary damages are not the primary remedy.
  3. How does the unclean hands defense work?
    The unclean hands doctrine prevents a plaintiff from obtaining equitable relief if they have engaged in misconduct related to the claim. For example, if both parties in a contract dispute have acted dishonestly, the court may refuse to grant equitable remedies.
  4. What is the difference between laches and estoppel?
    Laches applies when a party has delayed taking action to the point that it would be unfair to the defendant to enforce a claim. Estoppel prevents a party from making a claim if their previous conduct indicated they would not enforce their rights.
  5. Do I need a lawyer to assert an equitable defense?
    Yes, equitable defenses require a thorough legal analysis of timing, fairness, and prior conduct. Consulting an experienced contract or fiduciary attorney can help determine the best defense strategy.

If you need help with equitable defenses, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.