Key Takeaways

  • A default interest rate clause allows lenders to charge a higher rate when a borrower defaults on payment terms.
  • Courts scrutinize such clauses to ensure they are not punitive and are instead a genuine pre-estimate of loss.
  • Default interest should account for increased risk, administrative costs, and missed reinvestment opportunities.
  • Best practices include transparency, documentation, and consistent application of default interest provisions.
  • English law allows increased interest rates if commercially justifiable, even without a precise loss estimate.
  • Default interest provisions must be reasonable, negotiated fairly, and not used to penalize.

It's important to understand default interest rate clause. In the event a party fails to fulfill the obligations as set forth in an agreement, a higher interest rate will be incurred and this will result in a higher total amount due. This higher rate of interest is referred to as the default interest. It is a standard practice to include a default interest clause in most loan agreements, settlements, and commercial agreements.

For instance, if the original loan interest rate in an agreement is 6.24 percent per annum, and the borrower misses a payment, the loan may include a clause which would require the borrower to continue to pay the loan at a higher rate of 11.24 percent until the loan is paid in full. The blameless party must set the default interest at a reasonable amount that would reflect a genuine pre-estimate of the loss incurred.

What Factors Impact Interest Rates?

  • The current interest rate charged by major lenders
  • The economic climate
  • The industry
  • The nature of the business

These are all factors that are taken into consideration when determining a reasonable interest rate.

The default interest is not to be used as a penalty against the defaulting party. This is not the purpose of a default interest clause and it is against the law to be used as such. For punitive purposes, punitive default interest rate clauses are put in place as a means to deter the debtor from breaching the contract. The consequences are usually discouraging enough to cause the debtor to make every effort in fulfilling all obligations.

Practical Considerations When Setting Default Interest Rates

When setting a default interest rate, lenders should balance deterrence with fairness. While recovering potential losses is essential, courts are likely to invalidate any rate seen as excessively punitive or unrelated to actual harm.

Best practices include:

  • Benchmarking Rates: Compare default rates across similar industries and financial products to justify your own terms.
  • Transparency: Clearly disclose the default rate in loan agreements and explain the conditions that trigger it.
  • Documentation: Maintain internal documentation outlining the rationale for selecting a particular rate, including anticipated costs due to borrower default.
  • Consistency: Apply default rates consistently across contracts to demonstrate fair dealing and avoid claims of discriminatory enforcement.
  • Review of State Laws: State usury laws may cap the interest that can be charged—even in default. Ensure your default rate complies with local regulations.

By grounding the default interest rate in real-world factors like loss of income, added administrative costs, and increased borrower risk, lenders can improve enforceability and reduce the likelihood of legal challenges​.

When Is the Default Interest Rate Clause Enforceable?

Even if agreed upon at the outset of the agreement, when a default interest clause is included as a form of penalty, it is not a forcible clause. If a payment is missed or late, a legal fee may be enforced to compensate the lender for any internal expenses incurred in administering the late payment. The late fee is most often expressed as a percentage or a flat fee.

When a default interest provision is included, a higher interest rate will be incurred and remain in effect for the remainder of the loan until the default is cured. The default interest provision is meant to compensate the lender for the missed opportunity for reinvestment of proceeds and for the lenders increased risk of dealing with an unreliable borrower.

It is important that the lender set the default rate as fair and reasonable to ensure the provision is enforceable and not ruled or considered to have set at a rate of penalty. Most courts will determine if the contractual term is penal or if the clause is enforceable by examining whether there was a genuine attempt to estimate the actual loss that might be incurred if there was a breach in obligations.

Legal Guidelines for Default Interest Rate Thresholds

To enhance enforceability, default interest clauses should align with recognized legal thresholds. Although jurisdictions vary, common guidelines include:

  • Reasonableness Test: The default rate should reflect an actual or anticipated loss due to default, not serve as a penalty.
  • Disclosure Requirement: Borrowers must be informed of the potential default rate and agree to it at the time of signing.
  • Commercial Justification: Courts may uphold even higher-than-expected default rates if a legitimate business reason can be shown, such as covering late payment collection costs or mitigating higher credit risk.

U.S. courts often focus on whether the rate serves a legitimate business interest. If the default rate is significantly higher than the original rate without justification, it may be deemed unenforceable as a penalty. Lenders should avoid arbitrary increases and instead tie the rate to measurable factors like delay duration, loan type, and borrower profile​.

How Does English Law View Increased Interest Rates?

As long as the increased rate of interest is not unreasonable, English law will commonly uphold the default interest clause even if pre-estimates are not exactly genuine.

A loan which has gone into default is often viewed as a defense for a lender charging a higher interest rate. This is due to more time and expenses being involved for administration and monitoring purposes. In addition, when a lender's risk is enhanced due to nonpayment, the lender is forced to take on credit risk and this serves to justify a higher rate of interest, as well.

Out of respect for default interest provisions, most courts will not strike out a specified amount as being penal, or at least not on the sole basis of the amount specified being greater than the actual loss.

In Cavendish Square Holdings BV vs Makdessi (2012) EWHC 3582, the modern approach is confirmed when the courts ruled that focusing on whether the rate is commercially justifiable in the circumstances of the transaction is what matters rather than whether the rate reflects a genuine pre-estimate of loss.

International and Jurisdictional Variations

While English law permits increased interest rates post-default under commercial justification, other jurisdictions may differ in approach:

  • United States: State usury laws may cap both standard and default interest rates. Some states, such as California and New York, have strict limits and disclosure requirements.
  • Australia: Courts emphasize fairness and transparency, often rejecting default interest clauses that appear punitive.
  • European Union: The EU generally aligns with principles of reasonableness and proportionality, and certain consumer protections apply.
  • Canada: Provinces apply similar rules as U.S. states, requiring that increased rates be reasonable and not serve as penalties.

Regardless of jurisdiction, ensuring that the default rate is proportionate to the actual loss and negotiated in good faith increases the likelihood of enforcement.

Questions Asked When Determining Whether an Interest Rate Is Penal

When determining whether a rate is penal or not, most judges will ask four questions:

  • Is there a commercial justification for the rate?
  • Is the rate extravagant or oppressive?
  • Was there a level playing field at negotiations?
  • Was the rate set for the purpose of deterring a breach?

Strategies to Prevent Disputes Over Default Interest

To minimize legal disputes over default interest clauses, both lenders and borrowers can take proactive steps:

  • Use Clear Contract Language: Define what constitutes a default and the exact rate that will apply.
  • Avoid Ambiguity: Do not leave the default interest rate open-ended or subject to unilateral changes.
  • Offer Cure Periods: Allow borrowers a short window to remedy defaults before the higher rate applies.
  • Justify Rate Selection: Link the default rate to specific business risks, such as increased credit monitoring or opportunity cost.
  • Review Regularly: Revisit and revise standard contract templates to reflect evolving case law and regulatory standards.

Implementing these practices can help parties avoid claims that a default rate is unenforceable or was imposed in bad faith​​.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is a default interest rate clause?
    A default interest rate clause is a provision in a loan or commercial agreement that imposes a higher interest rate when a borrower defaults on their obligations.
  2. Are default interest rates enforceable in all states?
    No, enforceability varies by jurisdiction. Many states have usury laws or court precedents that limit default interest if it's considered punitive.
  3. What’s considered a reasonable default interest rate?
    A rate that reflects actual anticipated losses, such as administrative costs or lost investment opportunities, is generally considered reasonable.
  4. Can I negotiate a lower default interest rate?
    Yes. Borrowers can negotiate this term before signing an agreement, especially by demonstrating reliability or offering alternative security.
  5. How can I ensure my default interest clause is legally sound?
    Work with a qualified attorney to ensure compliance with state laws, commercial justification, and enforceability standards. You can find an attorney through UpCounsel.
     

If you need help with understanding default interest rate clause, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.