Key Takeaways

  • Confidentiality clauses in legal settlements restrict both parties from discussing the nature or details of a settlement.
  • These clauses are particularly beneficial to defendants, helping to prevent reputational damage and avoid additional lawsuits.
  • Confidential settlements can reduce unrealistic expectations from future litigants and help businesses maintain negotiating leverage.
  • Drafting a confidentiality clause involves defining confidentiality terms, identifying consequences of a breach, and determining how records should be handled post-settlement.
  • Plaintiffs may resist confidentiality clauses due to a desire for public accountability, while defendants often prioritize confidentiality for damage control.
  • Confidentiality clauses can benefit businesses but may also conceal harmful actions, posing ethical concerns.
  • The enforceability of these clauses depends on jurisdiction and public interest considerations.
  • A breach of a confidentiality clause can result in liquidated damages or other legal consequences.

A confidential settlement agreement is a provision in a settlement that prevents either party from discussing the nature of the settlement.

Necessity of Confidential Settlement Agreement

In many cases, including a confidentiality clause is a necessity in a settlement agreement. When these clauses are included, the parties, as well as their attorneys, are not allowed to disclose how the agreement was reached. While both sides in a settlement agreement can benefit from confidentiality clauses, they are especially advantageous to defendants.

Defendants can have several motivations for settling a legal case. For instance, when liability is involved, it's usually better for a defendant to settle than it would be to let the case go to court.

Several factors must be considered when trying to decide whether to settle a case. If the defendant is a company, for instance, they may wish to settle so that they don't have to take time away from their day-to-day operations to defend the lawsuit.

While liability can be a big factor in deciding whether to settle, cost can also be a big influencer. A company involved in litigation may decide to settle a case based on the cost of defense. If the company knows that defending themselves is going to cost a great deal of money, they may decide a settlement is the better option.

In terms of a confidential settlement agreement, defendants will usually insist on a confidentiality clause to protect themselves from further litigation. A case that is successfully litigated can be a signal to other parties that they should also consider filing a suit. By hiding the details of the agreement with a confidentiality clause, the chances for copycat litigation will be limited.

In most settlement agreements, there will only be a short description of the case, including an indication that there was a cash payout. Because these details are so sparse, it's impossible for the general public to understand what factors were involved with the settlement. When a settlement agreement doesn't include a confidentiality clause, it can cause the plaintiffs of future lawsuits to have an unrealistic idea of the damages they may be awarded. Lawsuits where the litigant has unrealistic expectations related to their claim can be very difficult to resolve successfully. 

Non-confidential settlement agreements can also make future negotiations difficult. One party may attempt to use the basic information of the settlement agreement during negotiations, despite the fact that the information in the agreement doesn't give a full picture of the case.

With a confidential settlement agreement, the number of people who have access to the terms of the settlement are limited. In addition to the parties to the agreement and their attorneys, the families of the parties and potentially a taxing agency may have information about the case.

Legal and Ethical Considerations of Confidentiality Clauses

While confidentiality clauses serve practical purposes, they also raise legal and ethical considerations. Some jurisdictions have begun scrutinizing these agreements, particularly in cases involving public safety, corporate misconduct, or workplace harassment. Courts may refuse to enforce a confidentiality clause if:

  • The case involves public interest, such as a defective product or environmental hazards.
  • The clause is deemed overly broad and restricts a party’s ability to speak about legal rights.
  • There is evidence that the agreement was signed under duress or coercion.

Recent Legal Trends:Some state legislatures and federal regulators have started imposing restrictions on confidentiality clauses, particularly in sexual harassment or discrimination settlements. In such cases, laws may override contract provisions to ensure transparency and accountability.

Pros and Cons of Confidentiality Clauses

Advantages:

  • Protects business reputation and prevents unnecessary bad publicity.
  • Prevents copycat lawsuits, discouraging others from filing similar claims.
  • Encourages faster settlements since defendants may be more willing to negotiate when confidentiality is guaranteed.

Disadvantages:

  • Conceals information that may be important for public safety or corporate accountability.
  • Can be difficult to enforce, especially when information leaks through indirect sources.
  • May violate public policy in cases involving serious misconduct.

Drafting a Confidential Settlement Agreement

To successfully draft a confidential settlement agreement, there are a few steps that you will need to take:

  1. Be sure that it's clear to both parties that the terms of the agreement, and the agreement itself, must be kept confidential.
  2. Make it clear that this confidentiality also applies to the dispute between the two parties and the negotiation process that resulted in the agreement.
  3. Include language in the agreement that specifies that breaking the confidentiality clause will be treated as a material breach of contract.
  4. Describe liquidated damages that must be paid when a breach takes place.

As a provision of the settlement agreement, all documents related to the case should either be returned to the parties or destroyed. Also, the parties should not acknowledge that these documents exist.

Sometimes, the plaintiff in a case will resist including a confidentiality clause because they are angry at the harm they have suffered due to the actions of the defendant and want the public to know what occurred. Defendants, on the other hand, will almost always want a settlement agreement to be confidential because of the guilt associated with a settlement. 

One of the biggest drawbacks of confidential settlement agreements is that it can put the public at risk. When the bad actions of the defendant are kept confidential, it can allow their wrongful actions to continue, removing the public's ability to protect themselves from bad actors.

Enforceability and Consequences of a Breach

A confidentiality clause is legally binding, but enforceability depends on contract clarity and jurisdictional factors. If a party breaches the clause, the other party may seek:

  • Liquidated damages, if predefined in the contract.
  • Injunctions, which prevent further disclosures.
  • Legal action, potentially leading to monetary penalties or voiding the settlement.

However, courts may decline to enforce a confidentiality clause if:

  • The clause contradicts state or federal law.
  • It unfairly silences whistleblowers or individuals reporting misconduct.
  • The breach was unintentional or resulted from public record disclosures.

Best Practices for Enforceability:

  • Clearly define prohibited disclosures and exceptions (e.g., disclosures to tax authorities or close family).
  • Specify consequences for breaches, including financial penalties.
  • Include alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provisions, such as arbitration, to handle breaches privately.

Exceptions to Confidentiality Clauses

There are circumstances where confidentiality clauses may not apply or can be overridden:

  • Government Investigations: If a government agency requests information related to an investigation, confidentiality clauses do not provide protection.
  • Whistleblower Protections: Federal and state laws protect whistleblowers who disclose wrongdoing, even if they signed a confidentiality clause.
  • Public Interest Disclosures: In certain cases, a judge may allow disclosures in the interest of justice, particularly in cases of fraud or safety violations.
  • Media and Social Media Risks: Even if a confidentiality clause is in place, accidental leaks or discussions on social media can lead to indirect disclosures.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Are confidentiality clauses always enforceable in settlement agreements? Not always. Courts may refuse to enforce them if they conflict with public interest, violate whistleblower protections, or were signed under coercion.

2. What happens if someone violates a confidentiality clause? A breach can lead to liquidated damages, legal injunctions, or even court-imposed penalties, depending on the terms of the agreement.

3. Can confidentiality clauses be negotiated? Yes. Plaintiffs and defendants can negotiate terms, such as limited confidentiality, exceptions for government agencies, or carve-outs for specific disclosures.

4. Are there industries where confidentiality clauses are more common? Yes. Confidentiality clauses are frequently used in corporate disputes, employment settlements, intellectual property cases, and high-profile lawsuits.

5. How can I ensure my confidentiality clause is legally sound? Consult an experienced attorney to draft clear terms, include enforceable penalties, and ensure the clause aligns with state and federal laws.

If you need help with a confidential settlement agreement, you can post your legal needs on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.