Key Takeaways

  • A hold harmless agreement in California is enforceable if it includes clear, specific, and unambiguous language.
  • These agreements are commonly used in construction, real estate, events, and services to allocate risk.
  • California courts carefully evaluate the language of the clause and the relative bargaining power of the parties.
  • There are differences between indemnity, defend, and hold harmless, each with distinct legal implications.
  • Public policy limitations apply: a hold harmless clause cannot protect against liability for intentional wrongdoing or gross negligence.
  • Agreements should be customized for California law and include provisions on defense obligations, scope, and exclusions.
  • It's advisable to consult an attorney to ensure compliance with California Civil Code and recent case law.

A California hold harmless agreement is a clause in a contract in California releasing one party from liabilities or consequences due to the actions of the other party.

Hold Harmless Agreement Clause

Hold harmless agreements are commonly used in contracts for construction. In this application, a subcontractor would provide a hold harmless agreement to the builder, contractor, or other professional to provide insurance against the work performed by the subcontractor. This agreement's provisions help to minimize legal action between two parties involved in a contractual relationship, including indemnity claims or litigation if a subcontractor or one of its employees was injured while working on the job. In a contract, the hold harmless agreement must include specific language to provide protection to the intended parties or the contractor.

This agreement must also outline any provisions to neglect:

  • Expenses
  • Claim
  • Losses
  • Damages
  • Other cause of action

These provisions would become important to the contractor if any disputes or problems were to arise during the job.

The protection granted under a hold harmless agreement varies, depending on the jurisdiction in which the contract is signed and executed. A hold harmless agreement could protect a contractor from any claims brought up by companies or corporations that aren't necessarily part of the agreement.

Enforceability of Hold Harmless Agreements in California

In California, a hold harmless agreement is generally enforceable—so long as it meets specific legal standards. Courts will uphold these agreements if they are clearly written, voluntarily signed, and do not violate public policy.

To be enforceable, a hold harmless agreement in California must:

  • Be unambiguous and specific about the types of liabilities being waived.
  • Clearly state whether it includes protection against "active negligence" or just "passive negligence."
  • Not attempt to indemnify a party against gross negligence or willful misconduct, which is prohibited under California Civil Code §2782.

California courts also assess the relative bargaining power between parties. If the agreement is seen as overreaching or coerced, it may be struck down.

When to Use a Hold Harmless Agreement

If any of the following may apply, a hold harmless agreement could be useful:

  • You don't want your activities to allow for someone else to be sued.
  • You are granting access to someone else to use your facility or property and wish to protect against any liabilities or damages caused by the other person.
  • A company or person will provide services for you, and you want to protect against liability if that person or employee of the company is injured while providing the services.

A hold harmless agreement is also called a:

Common Uses of Hold Harmless Agreements in California

Hold harmless agreements are prevalent in many California industries and scenarios, including:

  • Construction Contracts: General contractors often require subcontractors to sign these to mitigate liability for jobsite injuries.
  • Real Estate Transactions: Landlords may include clauses in lease agreements to protect against tenant-related damages or injuries.
  • Event Hosting: Venue owners often ask event organizers to sign these agreements to shift liability for attendee injuries.
  • Service Agreements: Independent contractors may include hold harmless clauses to protect against client claims.
  • Volunteer and Recreational Activities: Organizations may use them to avoid liability from injuries during participation.

Three Basic Types of Hold Harmless Agreements

There are three main types of hold harmless agreements. The first main type of hold harmless agreement is a broad form hold harmless agreement. In this agreement, a subcontractor is providing proof of insurance and that insurance provider will assume liability for accidents and accidents, both by the subcontractor and contractor. Since this type has such broad terms, many jurisdictions don't allow contracts to include the broad form agreement, and it is not recommended for maximum protection. A subcontractor may be required to obtain another insurance policy to finance its liability for validation of a broad form hold harmless agreement.

The second type of hold harmless agreement is the intermediate form type. With this type, a subcontractor assumes liability for any negligence and accidents. All related actions of the subcontractor are his responsibility, but the subcontractor is not liable for negligence or accidents that fall under the responsibility of the general contractor. This type is the hold harmless agreement used most often.

Its terms don't depend on whether the subcontractor is at fault. Instead, the terms of this type of agreement only depend on who acted in a negligent manner or executed an accident. If both parties are deemed to be negligent, the subcontractor is liable for any omissions and responsible for any actions.

The final type of hold harmless agreement is limited-form. This type only holds the subcontractor accountable for a limited form of negligence or accidents. Only the proportion of the accident or negligence that is the fault of the subcontractor would be his responsibility. In this type of agreement, the other associated hold-harmless agreements would outline all parties' responsibilities for negligence or accidents.

Key Differences Between "Indemnify," "Defend," and "Hold Harmless"

Although often used together, these three terms carry different legal meanings under California law:

  • Indemnify: To compensate the other party for losses or damages resulting from specified actions or events.
  • Defend: To assume legal responsibility for defending the other party in a lawsuit, often requiring the provision of legal counsel.
  • Hold Harmless: To release the other party from liability altogether.

In many contracts, these obligations are bundled together, but courts interpret each obligation independently. For example, agreeing to “defend” someone could require covering legal fees, even if no damages are ultimately awarded. Clearly defining these responsibilities in your hold harmless agreement is crucial.

Items to Include on Hold Harmless Agreement

A hold harmless agreement should include specific language to be considered valid and legally binding. The contract issuer or insurance company can provide the required language.

Any hold harmless agreement should be one of the following options:

  • Amendments
  • Terms definition
  • Cooperation
  • Failure to defend
  • Indemnification
  • General provisions
  • Notice of claim
  • Expenses
  • Subrogation
  • List of exceptions for indemnification
  • Notices
  • Payment
  • Jurisdiction
  • Authorization of indemnification
  • Governing law
  • Enforcement
  • Assumption of defense
  • Insurance
  • Liability
  • Settlement and consent (for all involved parties)
  • Rights and obligations (of all involved parties)
  • Duration
  • Other

California-Specific Legal Considerations

When drafting or signing a hold harmless agreement in California, it's important to consider state-specific legal standards:

  • California Civil Code §2778 outlines rules for interpreting indemnity contracts.
  • California Civil Code §2782 limits indemnification in construction contracts, especially concerning active negligence or willful misconduct by the indemnified party.
  • Public policy restrictions prevent clauses from covering criminal acts, fraud, or intentional harm.

Also, courts tend to interpret such agreements against the party seeking to be indemnified, especially if there is ambiguity. That makes clarity and specificity vital.

Limitations and Exceptions

Hold harmless clauses are not all-encompassing. Under California law, a party cannot use these agreements to avoid liability for:

  • Gross negligence
  • Intentional misconduct
  • Violations of public safety statutes
  • Unlawful activities

Additionally, courts may refuse to enforce a hold harmless agreement if it was:

  • Signed under duress
  • Unconscionable due to unequal bargaining power
  • Buried in fine print or not explained to the signing party

Ensuring transparency and equal understanding is key to enforceability.

Sample Situations Where California Courts Evaluated Hold Harmless Clauses

Here are a few illustrative scenarios that demonstrate how courts interpret these agreements in California:

  • A gym waiver signed by a member was found enforceable because it specifically released the gym from liability for injuries due to ordinary negligence.
  • A lease agreement clause was struck down because it attempted to waive liability for the landlord’s failure to comply with building codes—an unlawful act.
  • A construction subcontract was partially enforced, with the court allowing the clause to cover passive negligence but not active negligence by the general contractor.

These examples underscore the importance of context and precision when drafting or signing a hold harmless agreement in California.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Are hold harmless agreements enforceable in California?
    Yes, but only if they are clear and specific and do not attempt to waive liability for gross negligence or unlawful conduct.
  2. Can I be held liable even if I signed a hold harmless agreement?
    Yes. If the clause is poorly drafted or attempts to waive liability for actions that violate public policy, a court may not enforce it.
  3. What is the difference between indemnify and hold harmless?
    "Indemnify" involves compensating for losses, while "hold harmless" means protecting someone from liability in the first place.
  4. Do I need an attorney to draft a hold harmless agreement in California?
    While not legally required, it’s highly recommended to ensure compliance with California law and prevent future disputes.
  5. Can hold harmless clauses apply to third parties?
    Not usually. California courts are reluctant to extend protection to parties not specifically named in the agreement. Explicit inclusion is necessary.

If you need help with a California hold harmless agreement, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.