Key Takeaways

  • A BOOT contract (Build, Own, Operate, Transfer) allows private entities to finance, construct, and operate public infrastructure before transferring it to the government after an agreed period.
  • Variations include BLOT, BLT, DBOT, and BOO, each shifting ownership, lease, and operational responsibilities differently.
  • BOOT projects often last 20–40 years, giving the private partner time to recover investment through user fees or service charges.
  • The model provides benefits like reduced public debt, innovation from private expertise, and efficient project delivery, but also comes with risks such as tariff disputes, demand uncertainty, and regulatory challenges.
  • Compared to BOT contracts, BOOT agreements give the private partner ownership rights during the concession, which affects financing and revenue models.
  • Real-world examples include power plants, toll roads, and waste treatment facilities in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.

Boot contract definition: A private-public partnership (P3) project model where private organizations conduct large development projects under contract to public sector partners such as governmental agencies.

A BOOT (build, own, operate, transfer) project is seen as a means of developing large public infrastructures with private funding. The public sector partner enters into a contract with private developers, usually a consortium of businesses with experience and expertise in a particular industry or a corporation that specializes in designing and implementing large projects.

How BOOT Projects Work

The public sector may provide some funding or other benefits, such as tax exemption; however, the private sector partner assumes all risks associated with maintaining, operating, constructing, and planning the project within the specified time period.

During the specified period, the private sector developer makes a profit by charging individuals using the infrastructure. At the conclusion of the project, the private sector partner transfers the ownership of the infrastructure to the public sector partner, for the amount specified in the contract. These kinds of contracts are usually long-term and can extend up to 40 years or more.

Advantages and Risks of BOOT Contracts

BOOT contracts are attractive because they allow governments to deliver large-scale infrastructure without immediately straining public finances. Private companies finance, design, and manage projects, often achieving higher efficiency and innovation. Governments benefit from:

  • Access to private capital without increasing public debt.
  • Transfer of risk for cost overruns, delays, and operations.
  • Improved technology and management expertise through private sector involvement.

However, BOOT agreements also present challenges. Risks include:

  • Financial risk for private partners if projected usage or revenues fall short.
  • Regulatory uncertainty, especially in countries with shifting policies.
  • Tariff disputes when governments regulate user fees below profitable levels.
  • Transfer complications, since assets must be handed over in good condition at contract end.

Variations of the BOOT Project Model

Some variations of the BOOT project model include:

  • BLOT (build, lease, operate, transfer)
  • BLT (build, lease, transfer)
  • DBOT (design, build, operate, transfer)
  • BOO (build, own, operate)

Under the BLT model, the public partner leases the infrastructure from the contractor after construction. Once the specified period ends, it takes ownership.

Financing Structure in BOOT Contracts

The financial backbone of a BOOT contract is typically structured through project finance arrangements, where lenders rely on the project’s future cash flows rather than the balance sheet of the private company. Revenue is commonly generated through:

  • User charges, such as tolls, electricity tariffs, or service fees.
  • Long-term purchase agreements, like power purchase agreements in energy projects.
  • Government support mechanisms, including guarantees, tax incentives, or minimum revenue assurances.

This financing model enables large infrastructure development even in regions where governments cannot directly fund projects.

Examples of BOOT Projects

A BOOT project is operated by the private sector company for perhaps 30 years or more in a bid to recoup its investment before transferring ownership to the government. Examples of BOOT projects include power plants in the Philippines, waste treatment facilities in China, and highways in Pakistan.

Global Use of BOOT Contracts

BOOT contracts are widely used in sectors that require massive upfront capital. Examples include:

  • Energy: Independent power producers in India and the Philippines operate under BOOT agreements with government utilities.
  • Transport: Toll highways in Turkey, Pakistan, and South Africa are built and run privately before eventual transfer.
  • Water and Waste: China and Malaysia have relied on BOOT models for water treatment and waste management facilities.

These projects highlight the flexibility of BOOT contracts in addressing different infrastructure needs while balancing public and private interests.

Understanding the BOT Project Model

The BOT model refers to a build, operate, and transfer project model. In the instance of a power plant that is built under a BOT project model, the government can enter into a power purchase agreement where a government entity acts as an offtaker, or person who is buys goods or services. In this case, the offtaker purchases electricity from the privately built and owned plant.

As part of a concession, the private sector partner could alternatively sell directly to public users without the need for a government intermediary. The BOT agreement often stipulates the minimum and maximum prices an offtaker can pay.

Both of the above models are PPP (P3) concession models. Under these models, the Authority — usually a public sector agency, the government, or a private entity — gives the private sector partner a concession to plan, design, build, finance, and operate the infrastructural development.

Such concession models operate differently from private sector models when it comes to:

  • Ownership control
  • Technical collaboration
  • Risk sharing
  • Project duration
  • Level of investment
  • Performance management
  • Cash flow management
  • Tax treatment
  • Mode of financing

Elements of P3 Concession Models

The BOOT and BOT models have several elements in common. In both models:

  • Enterprise customers get access to operating capital, knowledge, expertise, and technology.
  • The private sector partner assembles the technology, processes, and personnel needed to complete the project as an outsourcer under classic outsourcing models.
  • After the prearranged length of time, the private sector partner (i.e. the service provider) transfers the infrastructure and service delivery operation over to the enterprise customer.

Major Differences

In a BOOT contract, the enterprise customer enjoys the benefit of not having to finance the public infrastructure, new service delivery platform, or service center. Under this project model, the private partners own, finance, and build the infrastructure and then manage it for a fee.

The private partner is responsible for every activity from building to ownership and management. After building the infrastructure, the private partner owns and operates it for the agreed upon time period while collecting revenue to enable it to recoup its investment before transferring it to the government.

Under the BOT model, the financing for the infrastructure or service delivery platform is provided by the enterprise partner. The private partner doesn't own the development, but covers its operating expenses by managing it for a fee.

The BOT model allows the private partner to design, build, and operate the infrastructure for an agreed upon period before transferring it back to the public sector partner.

Choosing Between BOOT and BOT Contracts

The choice between a BOOT contract and a BOT contract depends on the goals of the government and the risk appetite of the private partner.

  • BOOT contracts give private partners ownership during the concession, allowing them to leverage equity and debt more effectively. This can lead to higher investment but may increase tariffs to ensure profitability.
  • BOT contracts keep ownership with the government, which can make projects politically safer but less attractive to investors.

Governments may prefer BOOT models for projects where they want maximum private participation, while BOT models are chosen when retaining ownership is a priority.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the main difference between a BOOT contract and a BOT contract?
    A BOOT contract grants the private partner ownership during the concession, while a BOT contract keeps ownership with the government.
  2. How do private companies make money under a BOOT contract?
    They recover costs through user fees, tariffs, or long-term purchase agreements until the asset is transferred back to the government.
  3. How long do BOOT contracts usually last?
    They typically last 20–40 years, depending on the scale of the project and the time required for investors to recover costs.
  4. What happens when the BOOT contract period ends?
    Ownership of the infrastructure transfers to the government, usually at no cost or at a pre-agreed residual value.
  5. Which industries most often use BOOT contracts?
    They are common in power generation, toll roads, water treatment, and waste management projects.

If you need help understanding boot contract, you can post your legal need on the UpCounsel marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers on its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from prestigious law schools like Yale Law and Harvard Law and usually have 14 years of legal experience, including work on behalf of or with companies like Airbnb, Menlo Ventures, and Google.