Key Takeaways

  • Third party indemnification shifts liability for claims by outsiders (e.g., customers, regulators, or the public) from one contracting party to another.
  • These clauses are widely used in industries with significant third-party exposure, such as healthcare, security, and technology.
  • Key contract elements include clear definitions of indemnitor/indemnitee roles, scope of claims covered, and obligations for defense and cooperation.
  • Courts distinguish between first-party claims (between the contracting parties) and third-party claims (from outsiders); contract language must be specific to avoid disputes.
  • Commonly indemnified losses include personal injury, property damage, IP infringement, government fines, and data breaches.
  • Negotiation often centers on limitations, exclusions, and whether indemnification includes defense costs, settlements, or only final judgments.

Third party indemnification refers to a clause in the contract between a company working in health care or safety industries and a customer, specifying the compensation the customer is due in case of third-party losses.

Defining Third Party Indemnification Clauses

A safety alarm company has a hard time evaluating third-party risks and potential losses because it has no way of knowing exactly how many people go in and out of the protected property, the valuables they carry, or the reason they are there. In other words, the company has no way of knowing if it is prepared for any risks brought by third parties.

An unfortunate event, such as a burglary, fire, or theft, is not caused by the security company or its equipment. The people in control of everyday operations at the premises are in a much better situation to evaluate and prevent any such events, while the security alarm company can only act retroactively.

For those reasons, security alarm companies set prices without taking into consideration any third-party losses that may occur. The responsibility is passed to the property managers, who are in a much better position to prevent such events.

First-Party vs. Third-Party Claims

When discussing indemnification, it is important to distinguish between first-party and third-party claims. A first-party claim arises when one contracting party seeks compensation directly from the other for a breach of contract or misrepresentation. In contrast, a third-party claim is brought by an outside entity, such as a consumer, regulator, or competitor, against one of the parties, triggering the indemnification obligation.

Courts often require indemnification provisions to be drafted with precision. A clause that is broad but vague may not cover the intended scope of claims. To ensure enforceability, contracts should explicitly identify whether indemnification applies to third-party claims only, or also to direct losses between the parties

Third Party Indemnification Contract

The first part of a contract that aims to define third party indemnifications is clearly defining the used terms. The roles of the indemnitor and the indemnitee must be clearly defined from the beginning to avoid any potential confusion.

The second part refers to general concepts that form the basis of the relationship between all the parties involved:

  • The first of these concepts is an admission from the two parties involved that their actions may have effects on third parties. However, a company that provides a service is only responsible for any risks that the customer may face, not any indirect occurrences that affect other parties.
  • An agreement between suppliers and customers should not benefit anyone else unless clearly specified from the beginning.
  • Customers should not fully rely on suppliers to alleviate risks. Instead, they are expected to do the best they can to avoid liabilities. It is not the supplier's responsibility to resolve claims by end consumers; that responsibility falls on the customers.
  • The contract doesn't specify only the terms in case of an eventual dispute between the two parties involved. It also serves as a framework for the situation when the two parties work together to defend against claims made by a third party.
  • The indemnifying party is responsible only for their actions and should not be held accountable for liabilities caused by other parties.

The third part of the contract refers to the principles of collaboration between the two main parties:

  • The range of obligations for indemnification clearly defines what may constitute as a third-party claim. They usually include any damage to humans or possessions, data losses, triggered fines, or government penalties. Suppliers should be clearly indemnified for any third-party losses, except for situations where their acts or negligence contributed to the extent of the loss.
  • The full extent of any potential liability should clearly be outlined and any claims by third parties should be considered direct damages.
  • The relationship between indemnitor and indemnitee should be outlined, so in case an obligation to indemnify a third party occurs, everyone involved knows their rights and obligations, as well as the conditions for any mutual defense against the claims formulated by the third party.

Scope of Indemnifiable Losses

Third party indemnification provisions typically specify the categories of losses that may trigger indemnity obligations. Common examples include:

  • Personal injury or property damage caused by products, services, or operations.
  • Intellectual property infringement claims, where a third party alleges unauthorized use of their IP.
  • Regulatory fines and penalties, especially in highly regulated industries.
  • Data breaches and cybersecurity incidents, where third parties suffer harm from exposure of sensitive information.
  • Environmental or product liability claims related to defective goods or hazardous activities.

Defining the scope of indemnifiable losses reduces ambiguity and ensures that both parties understand the potential risks being allocated.

Indemnification in Commercial Contracts

It is usually expected that, in a professional relationship between two parties, any liability that should fall on any of the parties would be due to their own wrongdoing. However, the language used in indemnification clauses in commercial contracts is often vague enough to produce disputes in case of a claim by a third party.

In some cases, although both parties are obviously responsible for damages incurred to a third party, the wording in the initial contract is vague enough for one party to try and place all blame on the other. For that reason, the language used in the contract must be as specific as possible, covering most, if not all, potential situations that may occur.

Negotiating Indemnification Provisions

Because indemnification shifts significant financial risk, negotiation is often intense. Parties typically address:

  • Defense obligations: whether the indemnitor must defend the indemnitee against claims, reimburse defense costs, or both.
  • Settlement authority: who has the right to settle a claim and under what conditions.
  • Exclusions: such as excluding indemnity for gross negligence, willful misconduct, or breaches caused solely by the indemnitee.
  • Limitations of liability: whether indemnification is capped by contract value, insurance coverage, or excluded from general damage caps.
  • Notice requirements: timely notice of claims is often a condition to trigger indemnification obligations.

Well-drafted indemnification clauses balance the interests of both parties and avoid unintended risk shifting.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is third party indemnification in a contract?

It is a clause where one party agrees to compensate the other if a third party, such as a customer or regulator, brings a claim related to the contract.

2. How is a third party claim different from a first party claim?

A third party claim is brought by an outsider, while a first party claim is a direct dispute between the contracting parties.

3. What types of losses are usually covered by third party indemnification?

They often include personal injury, property damage, IP infringement, regulatory fines, and data breaches.

4. Can indemnification cover defense costs as well as damages?

Yes, many clauses require the indemnitor to defend the indemnitee and pay for legal fees, though this depends on contract language.

5. How can businesses negotiate fair indemnification clauses?

They can define scope clearly, include exclusions for misconduct, set liability caps, and clarify defense and settlement responsibilities.

If you need help with third party indemnification, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.