Key Takeaways

  • A subcombination is a component of a broader combination invention and may or may not be patentable on its own.
  • Patent law evaluates distinctness between a combination and subcombination by assessing independent utility, overlap, and whether the combination requires the subcombination to function.
  • When multiple subcombinations exist, examiners look at whether they are variants, usable together, or independently useful, which impacts restriction requirements.
  • The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) provides guidance on how to treat combinations, subcombinations, and related claims in patent applications.
  • Demonstrating that a subcombination has separate utility is often critical to overcoming restriction requirements and securing broader protection.
  • Applicants can claim the product, its process of use, and the process of making it as distinct inventions, but may be required to elect one path.

Subcombination refers to part of a combination, which may be an invention you're trying to claim a patent for. Combinations can be divided into two aspects: the apparatus and way in which the apparatus is used.

Combinations and Subcombinations

As an invention, a combination may be considered distinct or not from a subcombination. To justify imposing a requirement for restriction between combinations and subcombinations, there must be strong reasons in favor of imposing the restriction.

Inventions are considered distinct if:

  • The combination does not need the specific features of the subcombination for patenting
  • The subcombination has an independent utility or can be used in conjunction with another combination
  • A two-way distinction exists between the combination and subcombination

The idea of utility is often defined as an axis ranging from the full range of possible human activity to zero. A subcombination will likely be judged to have no separate utility from the combination if its scope of utility is smaller than that of the combination.

Definition and Legal Basis of Subcombination

In patent law, a combination is the organization of elements that together form an invention, while a subcombination is one of those elements that may itself be the subject of a claim. According to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) §806.05(a), “a combination is an organization of which a subcombination or element is a part.” This definition emphasizes that a subcombination can be considered an invention if it has a purpose beyond the overall combination.

Patent examiners evaluate whether to impose a restriction requirement between a combination and a subcombination by looking at whether the subcombination has independent utility, meaning it can serve a function separate from the larger invention. For example, a gear assembly (subcombination) within a machine (combination) may be patentable if it could be used in other devices.

Variations With a Single Subcombination

Your claim may involve a combination which depends on the specifics of a subcombination presented in a separate claim. As a result, the ruling will generally be that no distinction exists between the inventions because the combination cannot be patented without the details of the subcombination.

Alternatively, you may claim a combination that doesn't need the specifics of the subcombination to be patented. In addition, the subcombination possesses another utility. In such cases, the ruling is likely to be that your invention is distinctive and that a restriction should be enforced.

A further possible scenario you could face is a claim for plural combinations requiring a common subcombination. The subcombination will be examined from the standpoint of one of the combinations so that a decision on enforcing a restriction can be made.

Separate Utility in Restriction Requirements

The concept of separate utility is essential when determining whether a subcombination warrants independent patent protection. A subcombination has separate utility if it can be used on its own or in another context without the larger combination.

If the subcombination cannot be used outside of the combination, the examiner may rule that no distinct invention exists. However, if it can perform a standalone function—such as a unique braking mechanism that can be applied to multiple machines—it is more likely to be considered distinct. Applicants often face restriction requirements when examiners conclude that the subcombination and the overall combination are two patentably distinct inventions.

Plural Subcombinations

Some patent claims may include two or more subcombinations that are usable with the combination. This will usually result in restrictions being enforced, so long as the two subcombinations aren't variants of each other, or don't overlap considerably.

In a different scenario, you may claim two subcombinations to be usable in connection with a single combination, but rely on the details of one subcombination for the combination's patenting.

An inventor may opt to claim two or more subcombinations in connection with a claim for a combination that includes the details of at least 2 subcombinations. In that case, the inclusion of the details from the second subcombination will be taken as evidence that the specifics from the first subcombination are not essential for patenting.

Subcombinations Usable Together

When an invention includes two or more subcombinations, the examiner considers whether they can be used together or only separately. According to MPEP §806.05(d), subcombinations are not regarded as distinct if they are usable together in the same combination.

For example, a cooling unit and a control system within a larger apparatus may be seen as interdependent if they must work together. On the other hand, if subcombinations can be used independently or swapped with alternatives, a restriction may be required. This analysis helps prevent applicants from circumventing patent rules by claiming multiple distinct inventions in one application.

Related Products

If you're seeking a restriction between two related products, both the reasons for enforcing a restriction and the establishment of two-way distinction will come into play.

Inventions are viewed as distinct if:

  • Their scope does not overlap
  • They cannot be utilized together or have a different function
  • They are not variants of each other

Two or More Inventions Linked to One Product

It is possible to prove that the product and making use of the product are two separate inventions. To do so, you must demonstrate:

  • The process of use you're claiming can be carried out with another distinct product
  • The product you're claiming can be used in a materially separate way

You can likewise claim that the machine used to make a product and the product it produces are two distinct creations. To achieve this, you must:

  • Demonstrate that the apparatus can produce other products and was not simply made to create the product you're claiming for
  • Show that the product can be made by a different machine

If you think you've developed a new process for producing your product, this can also be claimed as an invention. The tests you need to pass to have it declared an invention are similar to those for the case of the machine previously discussed, i.e. that the process can be used to make other products, or that the product can be made by a different process.

Similarly, you can also apply for three distinct inventions, i.e. the product itself, the process of making it, and the process of use. However, you may be asked in some cases to choose between the option of applying for the product and the process of making it, or the process of use.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is a subcombination in patent law?
    A subcombination is a component of a larger combination invention that may itself be claimed as an invention if it has independent utility.
  2. How does the USPTO decide if a subcombination is distinct from the combination?
    Examiners look at whether the subcombination has separate utility, whether the combination relies on it, and if the claims overlap significantly.
  3. What does “separate utility” mean in this context?
    It means the subcombination can serve a functional purpose on its own or in a different invention, not just within the combination.
  4. Can multiple subcombinations be claimed in one patent application?
    Yes, but examiners may impose a restriction if the subcombinations are distinct and not variants of one another or usable together.
  5. Why are restriction requirements important for subcombination claims?
    They prevent applicants from covering multiple distinct inventions in a single application and ensure each distinct invention is examined separately.

If you need help with a subcombination, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.