Key Takeaways

  • Promissory estoppel allows enforcement of promises even without a formal contract when reliance causes harm.
  • The doctrine requires a clear promise, reasonable reliance, actual detriment, and resulting unfairness.
  • A promissory estoppel example often involves situations like job offers, construction bids, or financial promises that are later withdrawn.
  • Courts apply this principle to prevent injustice when one party changes their position based on another's promise.
  • Promissory estoppel is distinct from traditional contract claims, as it doesn't require consideration.

Promissory estoppel elements must be present in order for promissory estoppel to go into effect. Promissory estoppel is a doctrine that has its foundation in contract law and usually occurs in business transactions when a promise between two parties isn't kept.

The definition of a promise is a written or verbal assertion made by one party to another in exchange for something of value, or consideration, for which the promisor performs an act, which gives the promisee a legal right to expect the promise or act to happen. When the promise isn't carried out as stated, promissory estoppel prevents injustice to the injured party.

What is Promissory Estoppel?

Estoppel is a legal term meaning that something is automatically stopped. According to the principle of promissory estoppel, a promise is a type of legal contract or agreement that is supported by consideration and can be legally enforced. The principle maintains that a promise is upheld even though some promises aren't in the form of a legal contract or agreement or aren't supported by consideration because the promise itself acts as a substitute for consideration. Promissory estoppel stops the injustice that occurred to the promisee when the promise wasn't carried out by the promisor, thus incurring damages.

In the simplest terms, promissory estoppel means that one party can't recant or reject the existence of a contract, or promise, because doing so would discount the consideration involved. As stated previously, the promise compensates for the absence of consideration. The promissory estoppel doctrine makes it possible for the injured party to get restitution from the party that broke the agreement. Estoppel prevents, or stops, a promisor from claiming a truth that contradicts an already existing fact.

How Promissory Estoppel Works in Practice

Promissory estoppel serves as a remedy when no formal contract exists but one party reasonably relies on a promise to their detriment. The doctrine is typically invoked in situations where enforcing the promise is necessary to prevent injustice. Unlike a traditional contract claim, promissory estoppel does not require consideration—the promise itself can be enough to create an obligation.

A common promissory estoppel example is when an employer offers a job, the candidate resigns from their current position based on that promise, and the offer is later withdrawn. If the employee incurs a loss (e.g., being unemployed), courts may enforce the original promise to prevent unfairness.

This doctrine bridges a gap between moral obligation and legal enforceability by holding a promisor accountable when their assurance causes significant harm.

Elements of Promissory Estoppel

In order for promissory estoppel to go into effect, the following terms must be met:

  • A legal relationship of some kind must either already be present or be foreseen to occur between the parties. This legal relationship usually constitutes a contractual relationship. Parties involved in pre-contractual mediation fail when the terms of this doctrine are not met because it is unenforceable.
  • A legal contract begins when a promise is made by one party to another. In the past, estoppel could initiate based on a depiction of a viable fact. However, this standard changed when the court ruled in the case of Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 and allowed the doctrine to extend to possibilities of prospective conduct. This variation of “promissory estoppel” happens when the promise made in situations cause the other party to believe that the promise will materialize.
  • The receiving party depends on the promise. The party who depends on the unfulfilled promise has to experience detriment.
  • There is the occurrence of detriment. The party depending on the execution of the promise which was didn't come to fruition would have to endure some type of detriment like damage, harm, or other kinds of loss to themselves or to their property. The detriment would have to cause the party to have a worsened stance than before the promise took place and because he depended on the promise that never materialized.
  • There is unconscionability. Basically, there is no restriction that stops a party from breaking their promise. However, for an initiation of estoppel to occur and be successful, it has to be apparent that — given the details of the situation— it would be unjust or prejudiced to permit the promisor to break the promise they made. 

Real-World Promissory Estoppel Examples

Understanding how courts apply promissory estoppel is easiest through real-world scenarios. Below are several illustrative examples:

  • Job Offer Withdrawal: A company promises employment, leading the candidate to relocate. Upon arrival, the offer is rescinded. Courts may enforce the promise to compensate relocation costs.
  • Construction Bid Case (Drennan v. Star Paving Co.): A subcontractor submitted a bid, which the general contractor relied on to win a project. Afterward, the subcontractor tried to revoke the bid. The court held the bid binding under promissory estoppel.
  • Educational Financial Support: A student is promised tuition support from a family member and declines other aid. If the support is later withdrawn and the student suffers financial hardship, promissory estoppel may apply.
  • Retirement Promises: An employee is promised a pension or retirement benefit and retires based on that promise. If the benefit is later denied, courts may enforce the promise to prevent injustice.

Each promissory estoppel example highlights the need for a clear promise, foreseeable reliance, and an inequitable outcome if the promise is not enforced.

More Questions About Promissory Estoppel Requirements

Promissory estoppel permits a wronged party to recoup the advantage of a promise made by the other party who doesn't fulfill their promise,  even if there was no legal contract between the parties. The effectiveness of promissory estoppel depends on the significance of loss the promisee has experienced. For promissory estoppel to be enforceable, specific elements must be present. Promissory estoppel sometimes occurs in business transactions, so it is helpful to recognize it to safeguard yourself from possible repercussions by knowing the promissory estoppel elements.

Promissory Estoppel vs. Contract Enforcement

Although promissory estoppel is rooted in contract law, it is not the same as enforcing a contract. In contract claims, the agreement must include offer, acceptance, consideration, and mutual intent. Promissory estoppel serves as a substitute remedy when a contract doesn’t exist or fails for lack of consideration.

Key distinctions include:

  • Lack of Consideration: In promissory estoppel, no exchange of value is necessary. The promise and reliance alone may suffice.
  • Equity over Formality: Courts use estoppel to achieve fairness when enforcing formal contract requirements would result in injustice.
  • Limited Remedies: Relief is typically limited to reliance damages rather than expectation damages (i.e., putting the promisee in the position they were in before reliance occurred).

This makes promissory estoppel especially useful in pre-contractual disputes or informal business arrangements where formal terms are not finalized.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is a promissory estoppel example in employment?
    An employer offers a job, the employee quits their current job, then the offer is rescinded. The employee may recover under promissory estoppel for losses incurred.
  2. How does promissory estoppel differ from a contract?
    Promissory estoppel doesn’t require consideration. It enforces a promise when someone reasonably relies on it and suffers a loss.
  3. Can promissory estoppel be used in business negotiations?
    Yes. If one party makes a promise during negotiations that the other party relies on to their detriment, estoppel may apply—even without a formal agreement.
  4. What damages are awarded under promissory estoppel?
    Typically, courts award reliance damages—compensation for costs incurred due to reliance on the promise, rather than lost profits or speculative gains.
  5. Is promissory estoppel enforceable in all states?
    Most U.S. states recognize promissory estoppel, though application and standards may vary slightly by jurisdiction.

If you want to learn more about promissory estoppel elements or you have any legal questions concerning promissory estoppel pertaining to business or contract law, post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel has the most knowledgeable and experienced lawyers that are ready to assist you with your legal needs. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers, coming from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law, having an average of 14 years of legal experience which includes working with or on behalf of companies like Menlo Ventures, Airbnb and Google.