Key Takeaways

  • The order of inventors on a patent has no legal significance for ownership or rights.
  • Only true inventors who contributed to the claims should be listed, regardless of job title or funding source.
  • Incorrect inventorship can jeopardize a patent’s validity but can usually be corrected if done without deceptive intent.
  • While the patent office treats all listed inventors equally, the order may carry symbolic or internal recognition value within companies or teams.
  • Universities, companies, and attorneys may apply internal policies to decide the name order, but U.S. law only cares about correct inventorship.

A patent inventor name order may only be submitted by individuals. Private sponsors, universities, and funding agencies are not allowed to apply for a patent. However, if they are an assignee to the patent, they may have the right to ownership.

Inventorship Versus Authorship

Many scientists are recognized for their hard work by being included in the authorship of a scientific publication. However, in cases where their revelations result in unobvious, useful, and novel discoveries, scientists will seek to protect their intellectual property by registering a patent. Authorship is subjectively determined, while inventorship is legally designated.

Authors are usually added to scientific publications because they made a substantial contribution to the findings, or for professional courtesy. On the other hand, inventors are listed on a patent in order to determine the legality of the registration of the patent. For example, there are serious ramifications for not including the correct name(s) of the inventor(s), including deeming it invalid. There are a number of elements that must be included when submitting an application to register a patent.

  • Abstract: Synopsis of the patented invention, process, design, or substance.
  • Specifications: Details about the invention, including how it is different from earlier inventions.
  • Background: Explains how the invention is genuine.
  • Claims: A short and clear statement of what the invention is.
  • Drawings: Visually demonstrates how the invention works.
  • Declarations: A declaration made by the inventor acknowledging that he was the first to invent the process, device, substance, or design.

An inventor is considered anyone that helped contribute to the conception of the invention. By law, an inventor is not considered someone who only contributes capital to the invention or someone whose only contribution is to reduce it to practice. For example, if an individual's only involvement was to prove that the invention works by carrying out tests without actually contributing to the concept, then that person wouldn't be considered the inventor. Nonetheless, he would most likely be included as a contributing author on any research resulting from the work.

Determining an inventor is done on a case-by-case basis. Remember, each co-inventor may not contribute to all of the claims. For example, if there are 10 different claims on an invention but one of the inventors only contributed to two of those claims, then he is still considered a co-inventor. Additionally, similar to a scientific publication, inventors don't have to work together and it can be a collaborative effort based on various institutions.

Understanding Inventor Contributions and Rights

When assessing patent inventorship, it’s essential to understand that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) grants patent rights to the true inventors, not necessarily to employers or sponsors. According to MPEP 602.08(b), an inventor is a person who contributes to at least one claim in a patent application. This excludes individuals who only provided funding, testing, or administrative support without shaping the invention’s conceptual framework.

While a company may end up owning the patent through assignment agreements, inventorship is about the actual intellectual contribution, not corporate ownership or employment status. This is why determining inventorship can sometimes be contentious, especially when multiple team members, labs, or external partners collaborate on an invention.

Order of Patent Inventors on a Patent Application

The way inventors' names are listed on patents and research publications will often vary. Additionally, there is always significance to the order. On a patent, the person who is named first is usually considered the primary contributor. However, the order on a patent application carries with it no legal consequence because all contributors are treated as co-inventors. In fact, the default format will be alphabetical unless a different order is requested in the application.

In a scientific publication, the order of the names dictates how significantly each individual contributed to the research. The assignment of the lead researcher can get politicized because that person will be considered the lead author going forward. The party that files the patent application will have the authority to determine the order of the names. Generally, the attorney who is preparing the application will be responsible for arbitrating the order. While the application is in a pending state, the order of names may still be changed. This is done by filing a new application data sheet.

Attorneys, companies, and agents all may have their own standard for how the name order is determined. For example, a university may insist that department chairs are listed first, followed by professors, assistants, adjunct professors, and then interns and students.

Does the Order of Names on a Patent Matter?

Many inventors wonder: patent author list, does the order matter? Legally, the order of names on a U.S. patent application has no effect on the ownership rights, legal standing, or scope of the patent. All inventors listed are treated equally as co-inventors under patent law, regardless of whether they appear first, last, or in the middle.

However, some companies and institutions assign symbolic or internal prestige to the first-named inventor, even though the patent system itself does not. For instance:

  • The first-named inventor may get informal recognition as the lead contributor.
  • In some industries, this can affect how press releases or internal promotions are structured.
  • Universities or research institutions might have their own guidelines for ordering names, sometimes placing senior faculty first even if junior researchers contributed heavily.

It’s also important to note that while the attorney or agent filing the application can propose an order, the USPTO does not impose or enforce any meaning behind the order. If you want to change the order during a pending application, you can submit an updated Application Data Sheet (ADS).

What Happens if the List of Inventors Is Incorrect?

As long as the mistake was made without deceptive intent and unknowingly, the list of inventors may be updated when it's being reviewed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or after it's been registered.

It's quite common for the list to be updated due to amendments to the application. For example, in cases where a co-inventor only contributed to one claim and that claim has been eliminated, then the inventor's name must be removed from the application in order to make the invention patentable.

Correcting Inventorship Mistakes

Mistakes in the patent author list—whether in names or order—can typically be corrected if discovered early. According to USPTO rules, you can file a request to correct inventorship if the error was made without deceptive intent. This is often done during prosecution or, in some cases, after issuance through a Certificate of Correction.

Key steps include:

  • Submitting a request with the proper fee.
  • Providing a statement explaining the correction.
  • Ensuring that all affected parties agree to the correction if required.

Failing to correct inventorship can have serious consequences. For example, an omitted inventor may challenge the validity or enforceability of the patent, and intentional misrepresentation can lead to claims of inequitable conduct or fraud.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Does the order of names on a patent determine who owns the patent?
    No, ownership depends on assignments and agreements, not the order of inventors’ names.
  2. Can a funding institution or company be listed as an inventor?
    No, only individual human inventors can be named; companies or sponsors are not considered inventors.
  3. What if someone is left off the patent by mistake?
    You can usually correct inventorship through a formal request to the USPTO, as long as there was no deceptive intent.
  4. Why do some companies care about name order if the USPTO doesn’t?
    Internally, companies or universities may use name order as a way to recognize contributions or assign credit, but legally, it has no effect.
  5. Who decides the name order on a patent application?
    The applicant (often through their patent attorney) decides the name order, but again, it carries no legal weight in terms of rights.

If you need help with the patent inventor name order, you can post your job on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.