Key Takeaways

  • The term "opposing party" refers to the party against whom a claim, defense, or motion is directed in a legal proceeding.
  • Opposing parties have legal rights and responsibilities, including due process protections and ethical boundaries for attorney communication.
  • Courts weigh potential "prejudice to the opposing party" when ruling on motions like amendments or continuances.
  • Attorneys are restricted from contacting represented opposing parties directly, except under specific rules (e.g., ABA Model Rule 4.2).
  • Litigants must avoid actions that interfere with the opposing party’s ability to fairly present their case.

Parties Definition Law

Parties definition law are the laws associated with parties rights and obligations throughout a legal proceeding. The parties in a lawsuit are those who are directly involved or have an interest in the contract, transaction, or act. Such parties are known as opposing litigants. When a legal suit is initiated, the subjects in the suit are referred to as the parties.

Understanding the Opposing Party Meaning

In legal proceedings, the "opposing party" refers to the party against whom a claim or action is brought. In civil litigation, this is typically the defendant responding to the plaintiff’s complaint. In criminal cases, it is the accused individual or entity defending against the prosecution. The opposing party plays a central role in the adversarial system, where each side presents arguments and evidence in support of their case.

Understanding the opposing party meaning is crucial for ensuring due process and fair trial rights. Each party must be notified of legal actions and given a reasonable opportunity to respond. Failure to properly include or notify the opposing party can lead to procedural dismissals or appeals.

Moving Party Defined

The moving party is the party that filed a motion with the court. The opponent is referred to as the non-moving party. Keep in mind that the moving party is not a secured party. If the moving party doesn’t have to bear the burden of proof on an issue, that party can discharge its burden in one of the following ways:

  1. If the moving party can produce sufficient evidence that negates the element of the non-moving party’s case, then the burden of proof will shift to the non-moving party
  2. If, after the discovery process is complete, the moving party can prove that the non-moving party failed to provide proper evidence as to their claim, then the burden of proof will shift to the non-moving party

Parties in a Lawsuit

In a civil lawsuit, the person bringing the lawsuit is known as the plaintiff, and the opposing party is referred to as the defendant. Alternatively, in a criminal proceeding, the party bringing the suit is the government, also referred to as the state, commonwealth, or the people of the United States. The opposing party is the defendant. If, at the end of the trial, the case is appealed, the person filing the appeal is known as the appellant and the opposing party is referred to as the appellee or respondent. There are other variations of these terms, depending on the court and jurisdiction.

Adversarial Process

The adversarial process requires the parties in a legal proceeding to argue against one another, usually in the presence of their attorneys, and potentially a judge and jury, depending on the type of case involved. The parties will have competing interests and want different outcomes. For this reason, both sides present their issues during the legal proceeding.

At the end of the trial, one of the parties will essentially win the suit. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the case is over. The losing party can appeal the outcome of the case, at which point the higher court will determine whether or not the appeal is warranted. If it is, then the higher court will require the lower court to re-litigate the case. Depending on the type of case being heard, it might be very unlikely that a higher court will disrupt the choice of the lower court. For example, in criminal proceedings, an appeal is usually not successful unless there is a blatant error in the factual data presented during trial. Therefore, if the jury finds the defendant guilty, the higher court is unlikely to alter or intervene with the lower court’s decision.

Duties and Ethical Responsibilities Toward the Opposing Party

Legal ethics and civil procedure rules impose several obligations on parties and their attorneys with respect to the opposing party:

  • Duty of Candor: Parties must not engage in misleading or deceitful tactics that obstruct the opposing party’s ability to fairly present their case.
  • No Improper Contact: According to ABA Model Rule 4.2, an attorney must not directly communicate with a represented opposing party without their lawyer’s consent.
  • Fair Disclosure: Parties must comply with discovery obligations and avoid suppressing evidence that could disadvantage the opposing party.
  • Avoiding Prejudice: Courts may deny motions (e.g., to amend pleadings or extend deadlines) if they would unduly prejudice the opposing party by causing delay or limiting response time​.

These rules help maintain fairness, prevent manipulation, and protect the legal process from abuse.

Capacity to Sue or be Sued

In order to be a party in a lawsuit, one must have the legal capacity. If he doesn’t, then he is considered non sui juris, which means that he doesn’t have full rights under the law to be a party in the suit. For example, a child is non sui juris. This is because a child under the age of 18 is known to have a legal disability. Other people who might be incapable of becoming a party to a suit include those who are mentally ill, mentally retarded, mentally incompetent due to age or illness, and those who are incarcerated.

While those falling into these categories cannot bring a legal suit, it doesn’t remove them from all civil actions. Generally, the person’s legal representative, i.e., parent or guardian, can use the claim or defense of non sui juris.

While prisoners have a limited ability to bring a legal suit, they can still appeal a conviction and bring a Habeas Corpus petition challenging the validity of the conviction. If this occurs, the prisoner would also file a case due to a violation of his federally protected civil rights.

Rules on Attorney Communication with the Opposing Party

Direct communication between attorneys and the opposing party is tightly regulated. Under the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct:

  • Rule 4.2: An attorney may not speak with a represented opposing party about the subject of the representation without that party's attorney present.
  • Rule 4.3: If the opposing party is unrepresented, the attorney must clarify their role and must not imply neutrality or offer legal advice.

Violations can result in sanctions, disciplinary action, or adverse rulings in the case. These ethical boundaries are intended to protect vulnerable parties and maintain professional standards within the legal process​.

When Opposing Party Rights Are Prejudiced

Courts consider the potential prejudice to the opposing party when making procedural rulings. “Prejudice” refers to a situation where a party’s legal rights are negatively affected, often due to actions taken by the other side, such as:

  • Late-stage amendments that leave insufficient time to prepare a defense.
  • Withholding documents during discovery that later appear critical.
  • Filing frivolous motions solely to delay proceedings.

To avoid such prejudice, courts require that all procedural steps be timely, transparent, and not designed to surprise or disadvantage the opposing party​​.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What does "opposing party" mean in a lawsuit? The opposing party is the individual or entity against whom a lawsuit, motion, or claim is filed—typically the defendant in civil or criminal cases.

2. Can an attorney contact the opposing party directly? Not if the opposing party is represented. Ethical rules prohibit such contact without the express consent of the opposing party’s attorney.

3. What is considered prejudice to the opposing party? Prejudice occurs when a party is unfairly disadvantaged in a case, such as by surprise filings, lack of discovery, or limited time to respond to changes in the case.

4. Does the opposing party have discovery rights? Yes. Both parties in a lawsuit are entitled to discovery, which allows them to obtain information and documents necessary to build their case.

5. Can the term “opposing party” apply in appeals? Yes. In appellate proceedings, the party that won at trial becomes the appellee (opposing party), while the one appealing becomes the appellant.

If you need help learning more about parties definition law, or the rights and responsibilities of parties in a lawsuit, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel’s marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law, and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.