Key Takeaways

  • A mandate is both a judicial command (such as an appellate court’s order to a lower court) and a contractual relationship where one person gratuitously performs a lawful act for another.
  • The contract of mandate requires three elements: a subject matter, gratuitous intent, and mutual consent.
  • Mandates may be general or specific, express or implied, and are often tied to personal trust between the parties.
  • A mandate can end through revocation, death, incapacity, or change in circumstances.
  • In modern contexts, mandates also appear as government regulations or corporate directives, carrying significant legal consequences for noncompliance.

Mandate

A judicial command or precept issued by a court or magistrates, directing the proper officer to enforce a judgment, sentence or decree. Mandatum or commission, contracts. Some define a mandate to be a bailment of goods without reward, to be carried from place to place, or to have some act performed about them. This seems more properly an enumeration of the various sorts of mandates that a definition of the contract.

According to Mr. Justice Story, it is a bailment of personal property, in regard to which the bailee engages to do some act without reward. Others define it to be when one undertakes, without recompense, to do some act for the other in respect to the thing bailed.

From the very term of the definition, three things are necessary to create a mandate. First, that there should exist something which should be the matter of the contract; secondly, that it should be done gratuitously; and thirdly, that the parties. should voluntarily intend to enter into the contract. There is no particular form or manner of entering into the contract of mandate, prescribed either by the common law or by the civil law, in order to give it validity. It may be verbal or in writing; it may be express or implied it may be in a solemn form or in any other manner The contract may be varied at the pleasure of the parties. It may be absolute or conditional, general or special, temporary or permanent.

Types of Mandates in Law

The term mandate has several applications depending on the legal context:

  • Judicial Mandate: A command from a higher court directing a lower court to carry out a decision. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court issues a mandate after deciding an appeal, instructing the lower court on how to proceed.
  • Contractual Mandate: A gratuitous contract where one party (the mandatary) agrees to manage the affairs or property of another (the mandator) without compensation. The mandatary is bound to exercise reasonable care and is liable for gross negligence.
  • Administrative or Government Mandate: Rules or orders issued by public authorities, often requiring compliance from individuals or organizations. These mandates can cover areas such as health, safety, or business operations.

This dual meaning highlights that the legal def mandate is broader than a single context, covering both judicial authority and private contractual obligations.

Essential Elements of a Contractual Mandate

To form a valid contractual mandate, the following must exist:

  1. Lawful Subject Matter – The action or property entrusted must be legal.
  2. Gratuitous Nature – Unlike most contracts, no compensation is expected for performance.
  3. Mutual Consent – Both the mandator and mandatary must voluntarily agree to the arrangement.

While gratuitous, the mandatary is held to a duty of slight diligence and may be responsible for harm caused by gross neglect. The mandate may also be general (broad authority) or special (limited to specific acts), express (written or oral), or **implied (inferred from conduct).

Dissolving a Mandate

The contract of mandate may be dissolved in various ways:

It may be dissolved by the mandatary at any time before he has entered upon its execution; but in this case, as indeed in all others, where the contract is dissolved before the act is done which the parties intended, the property bailed is to be restored to the mandator.

It may be dissolved by the death of the mandatory; for, being founded in personal confidence, it is not presumed to pass to his representatives, unless there is some special stipulation to that effect. But this principally applies to cases where the mandate remains wholly unexecuted; for if it is in part executed, there may in some cases, arise a personal obligation on the part of the representatives to complete it. Whenever the trust is of nature which requires united, advice, confidence and skill of all, and is deemed a joint personal trust to all, the death of one joint mandatary dissolves the contract as to all. The death of the mandator, in like manner, puts an end to the contract. But although an unexecuted mandate ceases with the death of the mandator, yet, if it is executed in part at that time, it is binding to that extent, and his representatives must indemnify the mandatory.

The contract of mandate may be dissolved by a change in the state of the parties; as if either party becomes insane, or, being a woman, marries before the execution of the mandate. It may be dissolved by a revocation of the authority, either by operation of law or by the act of the mandator. It ceases by operation of law when the power of the mandator ceases over the subject-matter; as, if he is a guardian, it ceases, as to his ward's property, by the termination of the guardianship. So, if the mandator sells the property, it ceases upon the sale, if it is made known to the mandatory. By the civil law, the contract of mandate ceases by the revocation of the authority.

At common law, the party giving an authority is generally entitled to revoke it. But, if it is given as a part of a security as if a letter of attorney be given to collect a debt, as a security for money advanced, it is irrevocable by the party, although revoked by death. Roman law. Mandates were the instructions which the emperor addressed to public functionaries, which were to serve as rules for their conduct. These mandates resembled those of the pro-consuls, the mandata jurisdictio, and were ordinarily binding on the legates or lieutenants of the emperor of the imperial provinces, and, where they had the authority of the principal edicts.

Legal Consequences of Mandates

Failure to comply with a mandate can carry serious consequences depending on its nature:

  • Judicial Mandates: Ignoring a mandate from a higher court can result in sanctions, contempt of court, or reversal of actions taken contrary to the mandate.
  • Government Mandates: Businesses that fail to follow regulatory mandates may face fines, loss of licenses, or reputational harm.
  • Contractual Mandates: A mandatary who acts beyond the scope of authority or negligently may be held liable for damages to the mandator.

Understanding these consequences emphasizes why the legal def mandate is crucial not just in courtrooms but also in business, government, and contractual relationships.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the legal def mandate in simple terms?
    A mandate is either a court order requiring action by a lower court, or a contract where one person agrees to act on another’s behalf without compensation.
  2. How is a judicial mandate enforced?
    Judicial mandates are enforced by lower courts and officers of the court, and failure to comply can result in contempt or sanctions.
  3. Can a contractual mandate involve payment?
    No, by definition, a mandate is gratuitous. If compensation is involved, the agreement is not a mandate but another type of contract.
  4. When does a mandate end?
    A mandate ends upon revocation, death, incapacity of a party, or completion of the act. It may also terminate if circumstances change materially.
  5. Why are mandates important for businesses?
    Government mandates often dictate compliance requirements. Failing to meet them can result in fines, penalties, or reputational harm.

If you need help identifying legal def mandate, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel’s marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.