Key Takeaways

  • Due process ensures fair treatment through the legal system, grounded in constitutional guarantees.
  • It applies to both procedural fairness and substantive rights, protecting life, liberty, and property.
  • The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments are core to due process in the U.S., applying at federal and state levels respectively.
  • Courts have clarified due process rights in landmark cases concerning notice, trial rights, and liberty interests.
  • Examples of due process violations include biased courts, lack of legal notice, or compelling a defendant to wear prison attire at trial.
  • Due process also extends to civil matters and administrative proceedings—not just criminal cases.

Due process is an idea that laws and legal proceedings must be fair. The United States Constitution guarantees that the government cannot take away a person's basic rights to "life, liberty or property, without due process of law." Courts have issued numerous rulings about what this means in particular cases.

How Does the Fourteenth Amendment Influence Due Process?

The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the deprivation of liberty or property without due process of law. A due process claim is cognizable only if there is a recognized liberty or property interest at stake. Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 69 (1972).

Under certain circumstances, state prison regulations may create a liberty interest that is protected under the Due Process Clause [Kentucky Dep't of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 461 (1989)]. To do so, the regulations must (1) contain "substantive predicates" governing an official's decision regarding a matter directly related to the individual; and (2) employ "explicitly mandatory language" specifying the outcome that must be reached upon a finding that the substantive predicates have been met. Id. at 462-63.

How Does the Sixth Amendment Influence Due Process?

The Sixth Amendment, which is applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273-74 (1948), guarantees a criminal defendant a fundamental right to be clearly informed of the nature and cause of the charges against him.

In order to determine whether a defendant has received constitutionally adequate notice, the court looks first to the information [James v. Borg, 24 F.3d 20, 24 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 333 (1994)]. "The principal purpose of the information is to provide the defendant with a description of the charges against him in sufficient detail to enable him to prepare his defense."

The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the deprivation of liberty or property without due process of law. A due process claim is cognizable only if there is a recognized liberty or property interest at stake [Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 (1972)].

Do Inmates Have to Wear Prison Clothing During a Trial?

It is clear that a court cannot, without violating the Due Process Clause, compel an accused to wear identifiable prison clothing during his trial [Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501 (1976)]. This is because the practice furthers no essential state interest, and "the constant reminder of the accused's condition implicit in such distinctive, identifiable attire may affect a juror's judgment" and impair the presumption of innocence, which is "a basic component of a fair trial under our system of criminal justice." Id. at 503, 504-05.

Prison clothing cannot be considered inherently prejudicial when the jury already knows, based upon other facts, that the defendant has been deprived of his liberty. See Estelle at 507 (recognizing that "[n]o prejudice can result from seeing that which is already known"); U.S. v. Stewart, 20 F.3d 911, 916 (8th Cir.'94) (holding that when circumstances permit shackling defendant during trial, compelling defendant also to wear prison clothing is not inherently prejudicial because his condition as a prisoner is already apparent to the jury); U.S. ex rel. Stahl v. Henderson, 472 F.2d 556, 556-57 (5th Cir.) (holding that, where defendant was charged with murdering another prisoner while confined in prison, no prejudice resulted from trying him in jail clothes), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 971 (1973).

What Word Best Describes Due Process?

Due process is best defined in one word--fairness. Throughout the U.S.'s history, its constitutions, statutes and case law have provided standards for fair treatment of citizens by federal, state and local governments. These standards are known as due process. When a person is treated unfairly by the government, including the courts, he is said to have been deprived of or denied due process.

Example: Ezra and Sharon married in New York and had a son, Darwin. They divorced and Sharon moved to California; Darwin stayed with Ezra. Darwin later moved to California to live with Sharon; Sharon sued Ezra for child support in California. Ezra claimed that because he didn't live in California and had never been to California it would be unfair (a denial of due process) for him to defend the child support lawsuit in California. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed, saying that Sharon should bring her child support request in New York. Kulko v. Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84 (1978).

Types of Due Process: Procedural and Substantive

There are two primary types of due process under U.S. law:

  • Procedural Due Process requires the government to follow fair procedures before depriving someone of life, liberty, or property. This includes:
    • Notice of legal actions
    • An opportunity to be heard
    • A fair and impartial tribunal
  • Substantive Due Process goes beyond procedures and protects certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if the procedures are followed. These include rights related to:
    • Marriage and family life
    • Bodily autonomy
    • Privacy and personal decisions

Substantive due process is often more controversial because it involves courts determining which rights are fundamental and protected from legislation.

What Triggers Due Process Protections?

Due process protections are triggered whenever the government seeks to interfere with a person's:

  • Life (e.g., capital punishment cases)
  • Liberty (e.g., imprisonment, institutionalization)
  • Property (e.g., loss of a government benefit, license, or employment)

However, not every government action requires due process. The courts look for a legitimate claim of entitlement, rather than a mere expectation. For example, a government employee with tenure may have a protected property interest in their job, while an at-will employee may not.

Historical Origins of Due Process

The idea of due process dates back to the Magna Carta (1215), which first established the principle that the king could not punish subjects arbitrarily. The famous phrase, “by the law of the land,” laid the foundation for modern concepts of legal fairness.

In the U.S., due process was enshrined in:

  • The Fifth Amendment (1791): Applies to federal actions.
  • The Fourteenth Amendment (1868): Extends due process protections to actions by state governments.

These amendments form the backbone of American constitutional due process rights.

Examples of Due Process in Action

Here are some real-world illustrations of how due process rights come into play:

  • Criminal Trial: A defendant is guaranteed the right to counsel, a public trial, and to confront witnesses (Sixth Amendment rights incorporated through due process).
  • Civil Proceedings: A tenant facing eviction is entitled to proper notice and a hearing.
  • Student Discipline: In Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975), the Supreme Court held that public school students have a right to a hearing before being suspended.

Due process ensures that the government cannot act in a way that is arbitrary or unjust, regardless of the situation.

Due Process in Civil vs. Criminal Contexts

Due process protections are vital in both civil and criminal legal systems, though the procedures and consequences differ:

  • Criminal Due Process focuses on ensuring the accused receives a fair trial. This includes rights such as:
    • Presumption of innocence
    • The right to a jury trial
    • Protection against self-incrimination
  • Civil Due Process involves issues like lawsuits, administrative hearings, and property disputes. It guarantees:
    • Fair notice of legal actions
    • A neutral decision-maker
    • A chance to present evidence

In both contexts, fairness remains the cornerstone of due process protections.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the basic due process definition?
    Due process refers to the legal requirement that the government must respect all legal rights owed to a person, ensuring fair treatment in legal proceedings.
  2. What are the two types of due process?
    Procedural due process ensures fair methods are used; substantive due process protects certain fundamental rights from government interference.
  3. Does due process apply only in criminal cases?
    No, due process applies in both civil and criminal cases, including employment disputes, education discipline, and administrative hearings.
  4. How do courts decide if due process applies?
    Courts examine whether a life, liberty, or property interest is at stake and if the individual has a legitimate claim of entitlement.
  5. Can due process be waived?
    In some situations, such as plea agreements or settlements, individuals can waive certain due process rights—but only voluntarily and knowingly.

If you need help with understanding Due Process, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel’s marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.