Key Takeaways

  • Omission as actus reus means that a failure to act can sometimes constitute the physical element of a crime when there is a legal duty to act.
  • General rule: People are not criminally liable for failing to help unless a statute, contract, or special relationship imposes a duty.
  • Recognized duties include statutory obligations (like paying taxes), parental duties, contractual agreements (like lifeguards or babysitters), and situations where a person created the risk.
  • Causation and voluntariness still apply—an omission must be voluntary and causally connected to the harm to qualify as actus reus.
  • Moral vs. legal duties: While moral obligations exist broadly, criminal liability attaches only where law clearly recognizes a duty.

Omission as Actus Reus

Omission, or the failure to act, can sometimes be grounds for criminal liability if some action is required by statute.

In almost every jurisdiction in the United States, a six foot tall expert swimmer who sits by the side of a five foot tall pool and heartily enjoys watching a four foot tall child drown is not committing any crime by his omission (assuming he isn't the lifeguard, of course). The usual reasoning behind this is that people should be punished only for deliberately adding to human misery, not for being indifferent towards it. Also, in many situations where coming to another's aid might put the rescuer at risk, there is far too much difficulty in ascertaining at what exact point the risk to the rescuer becomes too great to incur criminal liability.

However, when statute specifically requires action on the part of a citizen, saying "I didn't do any harm" is not enough. In these case, harm is done to society by not acting (in the appropriate manner, anyway). Failing to pay taxes, child support, and alimony are a few recognizable examples of omission as actus reus.

Voluntariness and Legal Duties

For an omission to serve as actus reus, the law requires that the individual had the capacity to act voluntarily and that a legal duty to act existed. The principle of voluntariness ensures people are not punished for failing to do something beyond their control. Duties can arise in several ways:

  • Statutory duty: Examples include paying taxes, reporting certain crimes, or providing necessities to children.
  • Special relationships: Parents, guardians, and spouses often have legal obligations to protect or assist one another.
  • Contractual obligations: Lifeguards, nurses, and babysitters may face liability if they fail to perform duties assumed by agreement.
  • Creation of risk: If a person’s actions place another in danger, failing to mitigate that danger can lead to liability.

Liability For Failure to Act

Sometimes a close relative of the victim can be held liable for the victim's death if he or she failed to act. If a father watches his child drown in a shallow pool and does nothing, he may be guilty of homicide on account of the responsibility he holds for his child's life. Similarly, a mother can be criminally liable for her child's death if she fails to administer or procure medical treatment while knowing that such an omission will lead to death.

Causation and Consequences of Omission

Even where a duty exists, causation must be proven—meaning the omission must directly contribute to the harm suffered. Courts analyze whether the failure to act was a substantial factor in producing the outcome. For example, a parent who refuses medical care for a sick child may be held liable if the omission is shown to have directly caused the child’s death. Criminal liability for omission serves two primary purposes:

  1. Preventing avoidable harm by requiring people in positions of duty to act.
  2. Reinforcing societal expectations that legal responsibilities cannot be ignored.

Liability for Omission

Contractual obligation, verbal agreement, or even basic involvement can potentially lead to criminal liability for omission. If the six foot man by the pool in the first example was a lifeguard or a babysitter, he would probably be found criminally liable for the child's death. If he told the parents that he would watch the child while they stepped away and then failed to do so, he would probably be liable. Even if he negligently bumped the child into the pool and watched the child drown without acting, he could be held criminally liable for homicide on the grounds of omission.

Only when there is absolutely no connection, physical, contractual or otherwise, between the witness and the victim is omission no grounds for actus reus.

Limits and Policy Considerations

Not all failures to act attract criminal liability. Courts and legislatures balance between punishing indifference and protecting individual freedom. Some policy considerations include:

  • Moral vs. legal duties: While society may condemn the bystander who fails to rescue, criminal law intervenes only where a recognized legal duty exists.
  • Practical limits: Imposing liability too broadly could discourage citizens from acting at all, out of fear of legal consequences if efforts fail.
  • Fair notice: Criminal liability is generally restricted to situations where the duty is clear, so individuals know in advance what the law requires.
    These limitations protect against overcriminalization while still holding accountable those who have specific responsibilities under the law.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. When does omission count as actus reus?
    It counts when a person fails to act despite a clear legal duty, such as statutory requirements, special relationships, or contractual obligations.
  2. Can I be criminally liable for not helping a stranger in danger?
    Usually not. Unless a statute imposes a duty, the law does not punish moral failures to rescue strangers.
  3. What if I create a dangerous situation but fail to act?
    If your actions caused or increased the risk, you may be criminally liable for failing to take reasonable steps to prevent harm.
  4. Is omission treated the same as a positive act in law?
    Yes, in cases where a duty exists, omission can satisfy the actus reus element just like an affirmative act.
  5. Why doesn’t the law punish all failures to act?
    To avoid overcriminalization and protect individual autonomy, liability is limited to clear, legally recognized duties.

If you need help identifying what lectl omission as actus reus criminal liability basics, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel’s marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.