Key Takeaways

  • Affirmative tort defenses acknowledge the act but excuse it due to legal justification, such as self-defense, consent, or necessity.
  • Absolute and proportional defenses differ by whether they completely bar liability or reduce it based on fault.
  • Additional tort defenses include defense of others, authority of law, and discipline, especially relevant in domestic or educational settings.
  • Defense of property is valid only when reasonable force is used—not deadly force unless under threat of serious harm.
  • The use of privilege and legal authority, such as arrests or lawful detainment, can serve as valid defenses in intentional tort claims.Affirmative Defenses

Affirmative Defenses

There are a variety of affirmative defenses that can be raised against tort actions. The affirmative defense admits the act as having taken place, but acts as an excuse for the defendant's action, and negates or lessens civil liability.

Affirmative defenses are, in effect, counter-charges brought against the tortious action, sometimes implicating the plaintiff himself and, in any event, barring the plaintiff's claim completely or to a degree.

Defense of Property in Tort Cases

Defense of property is a recognized tort defense, but it is narrowly applied. It permits individuals to use reasonable force to protect their property from intrusion or theft, but not deadly force unless there is a simultaneous threat to personal safety.

Key points regarding this defense:

  • No deadly force: The use of deadly force is generally not allowed solely to protect property.
  • Reasonable belief: The defendant must reasonably believe that intrusion or theft is occurring or imminent.
  • Demand to desist: In many cases, courts require that the property owner first demand the intruder to stop, unless doing so would be unsafe or futile.
  • Mechanical devices: Using traps or other automatic defenses (like spring guns) is typically not allowed if they could cause serious harm, especially in the owner's absence.

This defense is most commonly seen in trespass, theft, and burglary-related tort claims and is often examined in light of whether lesser, non-forceful remedies were available.Additional Affirmative Tort Defenses

In addition to self-defense, consent, and necessity, several other affirmative defenses may apply in tort law:

  • Defense of Others: A defendant may claim this defense if they used reasonable force to protect another person from harm. The threat must be imminent, and the response must be proportional.
  • Authority of Law: If a defendant acted under the authority of law, such as a police officer making an arrest, they may be protected from liability unless the action exceeded legal boundaries.
  • Discipline: In limited circumstances, parents or educators may claim the right to discipline a child using reasonable force. Excessive force, however, could lead to liability.
  • Legal Justification or Privilege: This defense applies when the law authorizes certain actions that would otherwise be considered tortious, such as detaining a shoplifter or entering property to retrieve goods.

Each of these defenses hinges on proportionality and context, and they may not apply if the defendant escalated the conflict or acted unreasonably.

Other Types of Defenses

Absolute defenses bar the plaintiff's tort actions completely. A common example of an absolute defense is contributory negligence. If it can be proven that the plaintiff's own negligent actions were the result of his damages, then the defendant is not liable (unless she realized the defendant's contributory negligence and did nothing, in which case he might still recover damages).

Proportional defenses merely lessen the defendant's liability by the measure in which she is found at fault. An example of a proportional defense is comparative fault, which is similar to contributory negligence in that it attempts to demonstrate that the plaintiff's own negligent actions were responsible for his damages, but different in that it attributes only partial liability to him, which means a proportion of the plaintiff's damages may be recovered. It is the responsibility of the jury in this case to determine the proportion of the plaintiff's damages are attributable to his own negligence.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the difference between an affirmative defense and an absolute defense? An affirmative defense acknowledges the act but offers a legal justification, while an absolute defense completely negates liability, regardless of justification.

2. Can I use force to protect my property under tort law? Yes, but only reasonable and non-deadly force. Deadly force is typically only justified when there's a threat to personal safety, not just property.

3. What are proportional defenses in tort law? Proportional defenses like comparative fault reduce the defendant’s liability based on the plaintiff’s share of responsibility for the harm.

4. Is consent always a valid tort defense? Not always. Consent must be informed, voluntary, and not obtained through fraud or coercion. If these conditions aren’t met, the defense may fail.

5. When can legal authority be used as a defense in tort cases? Legal authority can serve as a defense when a defendant, like a police officer or security guard, acts within the scope of legal duties and does not exceed lawful conduct.

If you need help with tort defenses, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.