Key Takeaways

  • An injunctive relief clause is a contract provision that allows a party to seek a court order stopping another party from engaging in harmful conduct, rather than seeking monetary damages.
  • These clauses are especially common in employment contracts, where they prevent breaches of confidentiality, non-compete, or non-disclosure agreements.
  • Courts grant injunctive relief only if there’s a risk of irreparable harm — harm that money cannot repair — and if the party seeking the injunction shows a clear legal right.
  • There are several types of injunctions, including temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, and permanent injunctions, each serving different purposes.
  • Injunctive relief is widely used in intellectual property, business competition, employment disputes, and breach of contract cases.
  • Courts balance factors such as likelihood of success, potential harm, and public interest before issuing an injunction.

An injunctive relief clause is a component of a contract that specifically orders one party or both parties of the contract to refrain from doing an act that would cause harm to the other party. It is used in cases where there is no remedy for having caused the stated harm by exchanging money or other property of value, and the only way to prevent damage is to stop the stated action.

Injunctive Relief Clauses in Employment Contracts

Employment contracts often use the injunctive relief section. It is usually included toward the end of the contract, and it may be labeled “injunctive relief” or something similar. The employers' attorneys are responsible for drafting this section and making sure it is included.

The injunctive relief clause is typically used to prevent employees from violating non-compete orders, non-disclosure agreements, or confidentiality agreements. While most employees will never run into any difficulties or other issues with injunctive relief clauses, they need to pay attention to what they are signing and understand the language of the agreement.

Types of Injunctive Relief in Contracts

Injunctive relief is not a single, uniform remedy — courts may issue different types of injunctions depending on the urgency, severity, and nature of the dispute. The most common types include:

  • Temporary Restraining Order (TRO): A short-term emergency order issued quickly — sometimes without notice to the other party — to immediately halt harmful actions until a hearing can be held.
  • Preliminary Injunction: Granted before a full trial, this order prevents certain conduct during litigation if the party seeking relief can show a likelihood of success and the risk of irreparable harm.
  • Permanent Injunction: Issued after the trial concludes, this is a long-term or indefinite order compelling a party to act (or refrain from acting) based on the court’s final judgment.

These forms of injunctive relief are especially important in employment contexts, where timing is critical — for example, to prevent a departing employee from disclosing trade secrets or poaching clients while a case is pending.

Why Injunctive Relief Clauses Are Used

In the past, two types of court were used in the legal system. One was called “law courts,” and they were used for individuals or companies who were suing one another for money. The other type of court was called an “equity court.” In those courts, the entities or individuals were suing one another for justice or fairness, also known as “equity.”

In today's legal system there are not separate courts, but just one. Equity and money are still used as reparations for litigation. However, injunctive relief is a third type of reparation. It does not involve the exchange of money or other reparations, but just orders that person to stop whatever they are doing.

Employers use it to stop employees from passing along trade secrets to their competitors. They also use them to stop former employees from becoming competitors, which includes seeking out a company's clients to steal them away, or working for a competitor.

Employees can also use injunctive relief, although it's not common. They can go to court to force a former employer to stop an action that affects their future employment, such as attempting to blacken their reputation in the industry.

Common Scenarios Where Injunctive Relief Is Granted

Injunctive relief is most effective when swift action is necessary to prevent irreversible damage. Common legal scenarios where courts grant injunctions include:

  • Trade Secret Protection: Preventing a former employee or competitor from misusing or disclosing confidential business information.
  • Non-Compete Violations: Stopping an ex-employee from joining a competitor or soliciting clients in violation of a restrictive covenant.
  • Intellectual Property Disputes: Halting unauthorized use of copyrighted material, trademarks, or patented technology.
  • Business Competition Issues: Preventing a party from engaging in unfair competition or misleading advertising.
  • Contract Breach: Stopping a party from continuing actions that would make fulfilling the contract impossible.

Because these harms often cannot be fully compensated with money, injunctive relief provides a critical remedy that preserves rights and prevents damage before it occurs.

Do Injunction Clauses Work?

Injunctive relief is not always granted by the court. A judge must decide if the action that is subject to injunction truly creates a burden on the individual's future career or creates real hardship for the employer.

Injunction clauses in contracts can give the parties who sign the agreement a false sense of security, since approval for injunctions in court is not guaranteed. The main problems with injunction clauses include:

  • It's difficult to know the nature of the action that the clause seeks to prevent.
  • At the time a contract is signed, the parties may be unaware of the consequences of the actions that may be taken.
  • Courts in the past have ruled that the clause in the contract does not necessarily provide enough support to order an injunction.
  • Each situation is unique, and it is often difficult to determine the harm that may be caused by a breach of the agreement, or if it will truly be irreparable injury.
  • An injunction clause does not provide evidence of the parties' intention.
  • The presence of an injunction clause suggests that such a breach was anticipated, and therefore the parties should have taken more practical steps to prevent it.
  • A court may rule that the breach is better compensated with a financial award rather than an injunction.

Legal Standards Courts Consider for Injunctions

Courts do not grant injunctive relief automatically — even if a contract contains a clause allowing for it. Instead, they weigh several key factors before issuing an injunction:

  1. Irreparable Harm: The moving party must prove that harm cannot be remedied by monetary damages alone.
  2. Likelihood of Success on the Merits: The court must believe the requesting party has a strong legal case.
  3. Balance of Equities: The potential harm to the party seeking the injunction must outweigh any burden on the opposing party.
  4. Public Interest: The injunction must not harm public policy or the broader public good.

These factors ensure that injunctions are used only when truly necessary, protecting both contractual fairness and broader legal principles.

Equitable Relief

The term “equity” in legal terms means “fairness.” An equitable relief clause is another term for an injunctive relief clause, and is also called an irreparable harm or specific performance clause. There are four elements to this type of clause:

  • Language that states that violating the terms of the agreement may result in damages or injury that are irreparable.
  • A statement that reparations of monetary payments or other legal remedies would not be sufficient to make up for the breach.
  • The intention by both parties that the plaintiff is entitled to relief in the form of an injunction or other appropriate reparation.
  • A statement that the plaintiff is not required to post any type of bond

Drafting Effective Injunctive Relief Clauses

To increase the likelihood that a court will enforce an injunctive relief clause, contracts should be drafted with clear, precise language. Effective clauses often include:

  • Definition of Irreparable Harm: Clearly stating that breach of the agreement will cause harm that cannot be compensated by money alone.
  • Acknowledgment of Remedy: Expressly stating that injunctive relief is an appropriate remedy for breach.
  • Specific Circumstances: Outlining the types of conduct (e.g., misuse of trade secrets, competition, disclosure of confidential information) that would trigger the clause.
  • Bond Waiver: Including language that the plaintiff is not required to post a bond when seeking injunctive relief, if allowed under local law.

Well-drafted clauses help streamline court proceedings and strengthen a party’s case when swift legal action is needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is injunctive relief in a contract?
    It’s a legal remedy allowing a court to order a party to stop certain actions, usually to prevent harm that money can’t fix.
  2. What are the main types of injunctions?
    The three primary types are temporary restraining orders (TROs), preliminary injunctions, and permanent injunctions, each serving a different stage of a dispute.
  3. How do courts decide whether to grant injunctive relief?
    Courts consider factors like irreparable harm, likelihood of success, balance of hardships, and public interest before issuing an injunction.
  4. Can injunctive relief be used in business disputes?
    Yes. It’s commonly used to stop misuse of trade secrets, enforce non-compete clauses, or prevent unfair competition.
  5. How should an injunctive relief clause be written?
    It should define irreparable harm, identify triggering conduct, state the availability of injunctive relief, and, where possible, waive bond requirements.

If you need more information or help with injunctive relief, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.