Key Takeaways

  • A Himalaya clause extends the contractual protections and liability limitations granted to a carrier under a transportation contract (like a bill of lading) to third parties such as agents, subcontractors, stevedores, and employees.
  • The clause arose from the landmark English case Adler v. Dickinson, involving the ship Himalaya, and is now widely used in maritime and logistics contracts to mitigate legal risks.
  • Himalaya clauses can protect third parties from lawsuits, limit their liability, and sometimes incorporate forum selection or arbitration provisions.
  • For businesses, including a Himalaya clause can reduce litigation risks, promote contractual certainty, and align liability exposure with the scope of services provided.
  • These clauses must be carefully drafted to comply with legal principles in the relevant jurisdiction and to ensure enforceability, particularly in non-maritime contexts.

A Himalaya clause is one that is typically included in a transportation contract or a bill of lading with the purpose of assisting the carrier by limiting liabilities.

Definition of a Himalaya Clause

The name, Himalaya clause, originates from an English law case concerning a ship called the Himalaya.

A Himalaya clause benefits those who provide services in completing the duties of the individual directly protected by the contract. The individuals who benefit from the clause may include the following:

  • Employees
  • Servants
  • Agents
  • Subcontractors

Himalaya clauses are usually provided in contracts for the shipment of goods known as a bill of lading.

The purpose of the clause is to provide a carrier's employees and subcontractors with the advantages of a forum selection clause while also protecting them from being sued by various jurisdictions.

Depending on the jurisdiction, a contract that is not maritime may be questionable concerning prosecution; however, it is usually excessive when it comes to a non-maritime contract.

The Himalaya clause is utilized in a transportation contract or a bill of lading, and establishes rights for those who are a third party and not privy to provisions given by the contract. Its purpose is to grant the benefits provided to the carrier to other individuals such as stevedores and longshoremen.

The following is an example of a current Himalaya clause:

It is hereby purposely acknowledged that no agent, employee, or subcontractor of the carrier will be held liable under any situation, to the owner of the product, shipper, or any other person applicable to this bill of lading for any delay, destruction, or loss that happens while carrying out employment duties. All provisions, limitations, exemptions, rights, and conditions given to the carrier will also be given to all employees and agents of the carrier. The carrier is considered to be the acting agent for all individuals who are said to be his or her employees, agents, or subcontractors, and all these individuals will be considered covered in the contract discussed in this bill of lading.

As mentioned, a Himalaya clause is typically included in either the bill of lading or some other type of transportation contract.

When used in a transportation contract, the clause provides the benefits allocated to the carrier to the employees of the carrier such as:

  • Stevedores
  • Longshoremen

By utilizing the Himalaya clause, a carrier can use the benefits and protection provided to him or her by the owner of the product to also protect the individuals and businesses it hires to help transport, load, and unload products.

For instance, if a carrier employs a separate company to assist in loading and unloading products, and a product gets dropped and damaged, both the separate company and the carrier will use the Himalaya clause to protect themselves from liability.

Purpose and Legal Effect of a Himalaya Clause

The primary legal function of a Himalaya clause is to extend the carrier’s contractual protections and liability limitations to third parties who play a role in fulfilling the contract. These third parties—such as stevedores, ship agents, subcontractors, warehouse operators, and truckers—might otherwise be exposed to liability claims by cargo owners or other parties even though they are not signatories to the original contract.

The clause operates by expressly identifying the categories of third parties who will benefit from the contractual terms and by stating that the carrier contracts as their agent for the purpose of conferring these rights. Courts have upheld these provisions when the language is clear, specific, and demonstrates the intention to extend contractual benefits beyond the carrier.

In practice, Himalaya clauses serve several key purposes:

  • Limiting liability exposure: They prevent third parties from facing claims that would otherwise bypass the carrier’s liability cap.
  • Ensuring contractual consistency: They align all parties involved in the shipment under a single set of terms and conditions.
  • Reducing litigation risks: By defining who is protected and under what terms, they help avoid costly and fragmented legal disputes.
  • Supporting risk allocation: They ensure that subcontractors and service providers bear only risks proportionate to their roles and compensation.

Examples of Himalaya Clauses

The following are examples of Himalaya clauses:

  • It is hereby explicitly granted that all agents, subcontractors, or employees of the carrier will be held liable to the owners, in any situation, for any misplacement, destruction, or setback resulting from actions taken while performing duties throughout this employment, and without bias, all benefits and rights given to the carriers will also be available to the employees, agents, and subcontractors.
  • No agent, subcontractor, or servant of the carrier will be held liable to the owner for any misplacement, destruction, or setback of any kind due to any actions taken while carrying out duties required of the servant, agent, or subcontractor hired by the carrier; however, this does not forgo the liability in the case of intentional wrongful acts, fraud, neglect, or a breach of contract by the carrier or its employees, agents or subcontractors.

Common Drafting Considerations

When drafting a Himalaya clause, precision and clarity are essential to ensure it is enforceable. Poorly drafted clauses may fail to protect third parties or may be challenged in court. Best practices include:

  • Clear identification of beneficiaries: The clause should explicitly name the types of third parties (e.g., “agents, servants, independent contractors, subcontractors”) who will benefit from its protections.
  • Incorporation of liability limitations: The same exclusions, limitations, and defenses available to the carrier should be expressly extended to third parties.
  • Agency language: The clause should state that the carrier is contracting as agent or trustee for the third parties to grant them rights.
  • Scope of protection: Define whether the clause applies only during carriage or also covers ancillary services like loading, storage, and inland transportation.
  • Jurisdiction and choice of law: Consider including forum selection or arbitration provisions to prevent jurisdictional disputes.

Example language:

“All defenses, limitations of liability, and other contractual protections available to the Carrier shall extend to and be enforceable by its servants, agents, independent contractors, subcontractors, and any other party providing services in connection with the carriage of goods.”

Himalaya Clauses Using Arbitration Clauses

The Himalaya clause came to be after the English court case, Adler v. Dickinson, declared that a ship called the Himalaya could include a clause protecting its employees from liability.

This clause is universally approved with the exception of common law authority.

While this clause may occasionally be found in a charterparty, it is almost always provided in bills of lading established by those who carry products overseas.

Usually, the carrier privy to the contract does not actually carry the products by sea, but instead, hires other parties to do the transporting for him or her.

Practical Applications in Maritime and Logistics

Himalaya clauses are most frequently seen in maritime bills of lading, but they are also widely used in other transport and logistics contexts. For example:

  • Shipping and port operations: Protects stevedores, longshoremen, and ship agents from cargo damage claims during loading or unloading.
  • Inland transportation: Extends protections to trucking companies, rail carriers, or warehouse operators engaged by the carrier.
  • Freight forwarding and logistics: Ensures subcontractors involved in multimodal transport enjoy the same defenses as the primary carrier.

In many jurisdictions, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia, courts have consistently enforced Himalaya clauses where the contract demonstrates a clear intention to benefit third parties. However, enforceability can vary, particularly in non-maritime contexts or where the doctrine of privity of contract is narrowly interpreted.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Why is it called a Himalaya clause?
    The term originates from the English case Adler v. Dickinson involving the ship Himalaya, where the court upheld a clause protecting the ship’s employees from liability.
  2. Who benefits from a Himalaya clause?
    Employees, agents, subcontractors, stevedores, and other third parties performing services under the contract can benefit from the same liability protections as the carrier.
  3. Are Himalaya clauses enforceable in all jurisdictions?
    Generally yes, especially in maritime law, but enforceability depends on how clearly the clause is drafted and whether local law allows third-party beneficiaries.
  4. Can a Himalaya clause include arbitration or forum selection terms?
    Yes. Including these terms helps ensure disputes are resolved consistently and in a forum agreed upon by the contracting parties.
  5. What happens if a Himalaya clause is poorly drafted?
    If the clause is ambiguous or fails to identify beneficiaries clearly, courts may refuse to extend liability protections to third parties, leaving them exposed to claims.

If you need help with a himalaya clause, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies such as Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.