Key Takeaways

  • Full ratchet anti-dilution is a powerful investor protection mechanism that adjusts conversion prices when new shares are issued at a lower price, preserving the original investor’s ownership percentage.
  • It offers maximum downside protection but can heavily dilute founders and other shareholders, potentially deterring future investors.
  • This provision is most common in early-stage venture deals and down rounds, where valuation uncertainty is high.
  • Alternatives like weighted average anti-dilution offer more balanced protection and are often preferred for long-term investor-founder alignment.
  • Companies should negotiate clear terms, including trigger events, limitations, and sunset clauses, to avoid future conflicts.

Full-ratchet anti-dilution refers to a provision in which the lowest sale price is applied to common stock shares a company sells after issuing a convertible security or option as the conversion ration or adjusted option price for current shareholders. This lets shareholders maintain the same ownership percentage as they had with the initial investment.

Reasons for Full-Ratchet Anti-Dilution 

If an investor originally paid $5 per share for a 20 percent stake in the company and new financing is released at $2.50 a share, he or she would have to purchase additional shares to maintain the current ownership stake. With full-ratchet anti-dilution, this individual can convert existing shares to the $2.50 price, thus doubling the number of shares held and preserving his or her ownership stake from dilution by the new stock offering.

The full-ratchet strategy also provides cost protection if a new round of financing is offered at a higher price than the initial round of financing. This also allows an original investor to maintain the current ownership stake without investing additional funds in the company.

Some companies require investors to hold a certain percentage of existing shares to maintain preferred rights. This is important if an investor will lose voting rights with a new stock offering because he or she will fall below this percentage. 

Many investors also want to maintain their current percentage as the company grows, which can increase their eventual return on investment when share values rise.

When Full Ratchet Anti-Dilution Is Most Effective

Full ratchet anti-dilution provisions are particularly valuable in early-stage financing rounds where valuations are highly uncertain, and the risk of a down round is significant. They serve as a powerful investor safeguard during volatile market conditions or when a company’s future funding prospects are unclear.

Some common scenarios where a full ratchet clause is strategically used include:

  • Seed and Series A funding: Early investors often demand stronger anti-dilution rights because valuation growth is unpredictable and they are assuming more risk.
  • Down rounds: If future funding occurs at a lower valuation, the full ratchet ensures initial investors’ shares are repriced to the new, lower price without requiring additional capital.
  • Negotiation leverage: Investors with substantial bargaining power may insist on full ratchet provisions to strengthen their downside protection, especially if the company’s growth prospects are speculative.

However, while these provisions benefit investors, founders and management teams should weigh the potential dilution consequences and negotiate terms that balance protection with future fundraising flexibility.

How Full-Ratchet Anti-Dilution Works

Full-ratchet anti-dilution is often included in preferred stock terms for new investors. Here's how this price protection strategy works:

  • A company offers an initial round of preferred stock, Series A, at $10 per share.
  • If the company later makes an initial public offering (IPO), the shareholders who purchased Series A stock shares could convert preferred stock to common stock on a one-to-one basis.
  • Provisions in the original stock terms indicate that if more shares of common or preferred stock are offered at a cost of less than $10 per share, the Series A investors can convert preferred stock shares to common stock shares at the lower price, thus increasing their percentage of holdings.
  • For example, if the company subsequently offers Series B preferred stock at a cost of $5 per share, stockholders who purchased 100 shares of Series A stock could convert it to 200 shares of Series B stock. This allows early investors to get the first benefit of later stock offerings.

Key Terms and Mechanics of a Full Ratchet Clause

A full ratchet anti-dilution clause typically includes several defined elements that govern how and when the adjustment occurs:

  • Trigger Events: The provision is activated when new shares are issued at a price lower than the previous round’s price.
  • Conversion Price Adjustment: The preferred shares’ conversion price is reset to the price of the new issuance, regardless of how many shares are issued.
  • Impact on Ownership: Because the conversion price decreases, the number of common shares that preferred shareholders can convert into increases, preserving their percentage ownership.
  • Scope of Protection: Full ratchet clauses usually apply only to future equity issuances and do not affect shares issued as part of employee stock option plans, mergers, or acquisitions.

For example, if Series A investors purchased shares at $10 each and the company later issues Series B shares at $5, the Series A conversion price resets to $5. This allows Series A investors to convert their preferred shares into twice as many common shares, fully offsetting the dilution caused by the lower-priced round.

Disadvantages of Full Ratchet Anti-Dilution

This strategy requires the company to issue more shares to new investors so they can also reach their desired ownership percentage, meaning the percentage of the company the founders and managers own can still be severely diluted.

In addition, many new investors would be hesitant to put money into a company with anti-dilution protections on outstanding preferred stock shares, as this may ultimately devalue the company.

The full ratchet works best in cases in which investors disagree on a company's value during the initial round, as it can be used to automatically adjust the cap table if the business fails to perform to expectations. In other scenarios, however, a full-ratchet strategy adds complexity without adding benefit. For this reason, most companies and investors prefer the weighted average method of anti-dilution.

Investor and Company Considerations Before Agreeing

While full ratchet anti-dilution provides robust protection, it also comes with significant trade-offs for both investors and companies:

  • Future Investment Deterrent: Prospective investors may hesitate to participate in future rounds if they perceive the capital structure as overly protective of early investors, which can complicate fundraising.
  • Founder Dilution: Founders and early employees often bear the brunt of dilution, potentially losing substantial equity and control.
  • Cap Table Complexity: The repricing mechanics can significantly alter ownership percentages, making the company’s cap table harder to manage and evaluate.
  • Negotiation Challenges: Including full ratchet clauses can extend negotiations and create tension between investors and founders, especially when trying to balance current protection with future growth needs.

For these reasons, some companies negotiate limitations or sunset clauses that automatically phase out full ratchet protection after a certain period or after a successful funding round, providing a middle ground between investor security and company flexibility.

Weighted Average Anti-Dilution

The weighted average method also issues additional shares of common stock to preferred stockholders during a down round and adjusts the conversion rate, but the impact is easier to control and integrate into the pricing of the new stock shares. Also called broad-based anti-dilution, it strives to balance money previously raised with the amount of money raised in a down round and the share prices of each. The conversion rate is typically lower than that of a full-ratchet strategy.

In cases where full-ratchet provisions must be used, their effective period should be limited to one year, after which weighted average provisions would be used. Otherwise, investors must take an active role in the governance of the organization and the decision to welcome additional investors. To maintain their ownership stake without anti-dilution provisions, they will have to invest in future rounds of financing.

Other Alternatives to Consider

While the weighted average method is the most common alternative, several other mechanisms can also address dilution risk with less severe consequences than a full ratchet provision:

  • Narrow-Based Weighted Average: Adjusts conversion prices using only the price and number of shares in the new round, offering more protection to investors than broad-based formulas.
  • Pay-to-Play Provisions: Require investors to participate in subsequent financing rounds to maintain anti-dilution protections, aligning incentives between investors and the company.
  • Convertible Notes with Valuation Caps: Provide early investors with favorable conversion terms without needing full anti-dilution provisions.

These alternatives can achieve similar goals—protecting investors from down rounds—while maintaining a more attractive capital structure for future investors and reducing founder dilution.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is full ratchet anti-dilution in venture capital?
    It’s a provision that resets the conversion price of preferred shares to the lowest price of a future issuance, ensuring investors maintain their ownership percentage.
  2. How is full ratchet different from weighted average anti-dilution?
    Full ratchet fully resets the conversion price to the new share price, while weighted average considers both the price and quantity of new shares, resulting in less dilution.
  3. When is full ratchet anti-dilution most commonly used?
    It’s typically used in early-stage financing or down rounds where valuation risk is high and investors seek maximum downside protection.
  4. Does full ratchet affect future fundraising rounds?
    Yes, it can deter new investors due to increased dilution risk and complex cap table adjustments, potentially complicating future financing efforts.
  5. Can companies negotiate limits on full ratchet provisions?
    Yes, companies often negotiate sunset clauses or participation requirements to reduce the long-term impact and balance investor and company interests.

If you need help with full ratchet anti dilution, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.