Key Takeaways

  • An efficient breach occurs when breaking a contract is more economically advantageous than performing it.
  • The doctrine is rooted in law and economics, aiming to maximize overall societal wealth without penalizing the breaching party beyond compensating the non-breaching party.
  • Efficient breach theory remains controversial, facing moral, legal, and economic criticisms.
  • Common examples involve real estate defaults, commercial renegotiations, or unexpected market opportunities.
  • Courts often support efficient breach when expectation damages fully compensate the non-breaching party, not when harm persists.
  • Efficient reliance refers to the level of investment or preparation justified by the likelihood of contract performance.
  • Critics argue that efficient breach may incentivize strategic contract breaking, undermining trust and stability in business relationships.

Efficient breach is when one party finds it more efficient to breach a contract and pay a penalty than to carry out its contractual obligations. In the case that it is more economically or otherwise beneficial for the party to break the contract, even with penalties, the best option is the efficient breach. However, the breach is only considered efficient if there is no harm done to the other party.

Efficient Breach Law

When a civil court hears a case of efficient breach, and finds the plaintiff is correctly benefited from breaking its obligation, generally there is no further compensation for the plaintiff. Penalties are included in the consideration, but monetary damages are usually not, as that is considered overcompensating to the plaintiff.

On the defendant's side, if the plaintiff accepts the penalties imposed by the breach, compensation is considered as complete as if the contract had been followed through as signed. While advocating immoral behavior, most courts agree that efficient breach is economically efficient, as at least one party is better off because of the breach and no parties are worse off.

Origins and Legal Theory of Efficient Breach

The theory of efficient breach is closely tied to the law and economics movement, particularly the work of scholars like Richard Posner. The central premise is that a party should be allowed—and even encouraged—to breach a contract if doing so leads to a net economic gain, provided the non-breaching party receives sufficient compensation through expectation damages.

Expectation damages are calculated to place the non-breaching party in the same economic position they would have been in had the contract been fully performed. The goal is not to punish the breaching party but to facilitate a more efficient allocation of resources.

From a legal standpoint, the efficient breach doctrine hinges on liability rules rather than property rules. In this model, the right to performance is protected by monetary compensation rather than injunctive relief or specific performance.

Efficient Breach Example

Consider a commercial contract signed between parties A and B. A agrees to sell 100 units of product to B for $50 per piece. Party C then appears and wants to pay $100 per piece. A will have to give B its deposit back and pay B a fee of $25. However, A will still gain an extra $4,975 by selling the 100 units to C and breaking the contract with B. In this example, B has been fairly compensated for the inconvenience and A (and C) are both better off, therefore this breach of contract is economically efficient.

An efficient breach must fit the following criteria:

  • A valid contract must exist
  • Breaching the contract, by not performing the obligations defined within, must be done to the economic advantage of the breaching party
  • The non-breaching party must be compensated as outlined within the contract
  • The non-breaching party, after receiving compensation, must be no worse off economically

Real-World Applications of Efficient Breach

Efficient breach scenarios are common in high-value commercial contracts, especially when market conditions change rapidly. For example:

  • Real Estate Contracts: A seller agrees to sell a property for $500,000 but later receives an offer for $600,000. If the penalty for breach is $50,000, breaching the contract is economically rational.
  • Supply Agreements: A supplier may agree to deliver goods at a fixed price but later finds a buyer willing to pay more. If the supplier can compensate the original buyer’s losses, the breach may be considered efficient.

However, this rationale only holds if the original party is fully compensated and not left in a worse position than if the contract had been fulfilled.

Breakdown of Efficient Breach

The 2008-2009 US mortgage crisis was the cause of many contract breaches nationwide. On the side of the consumer, the value of the real estate had fallen so far that what was owed was more than the current value of the real estate. Home owners purposefully defaulted, considering it more efficient than paying on an 'underwater' mortgage. Homes and land were then repossessed by the lender. The defaulted borrowers were of course left with a lower credit score, but could rent or buy a property with a lower monthly payment.

Unlike a true efficient breach, however, in said instances the lender was at a disadvantage. This is because the value of the property recovered is now much less than the amount of money that is owed to them in the contract. According to economic theory, and to the courts upholding contract law, this is not an efficient breach, as the non-breaching party is worse off while the breaching party takes an advantage.

Economic Criticism and Moral Concerns

While efficient breach is defended on economic grounds, it is not without its critics. Opponents argue that:

  • It undermines the sanctity of contracts, encouraging opportunistic behavior.
  • It may erode trust in commercial relationships, particularly in long-term dealings.
  • The assumption that parties can be made whole with money is flawed in contracts involving unique goods, reputation, or emotional stakes.

Legal scholars also point out that reliance on expectation damages may not fully account for transaction costs, litigation expenses, and non-quantifiable harms, which can skew the perceived efficiency.

Efficient Breach and Efficient Reliance

Efficient reliance is the concept that a signed contract is a legally binding document of trust between the parties involved. This means neither party is signing the contract in order to deliberately breach it later on. Under contract law, most legal contracts have a built in remedy in case of breach. Thus, while not expected, if one party does happen to breach the contract, the other will be compensated fairly per the built-in remedy. This is efficient reliance, and it enables the non-breaching party to break even rather than take a loss on the other party's breaking of trust.

The level of reliance in this case is only enough to break the non-breaching party even. It does not over-rely on the potentially breaching party by forcing it to pay punitive damages. It also does not make an example of the breaching party by imposing penalties far in excess of the crime. The breach, in this instance, is an efficient distribution of both contract reliance and economic resources.

Remedies Beyond Expectation Damages

While expectation damages are the standard remedy in efficient breach cases, courts may also consider:

  • Specific performance, especially where monetary compensation is inadequate (e.g., in real estate or unique goods contracts).
  • Restitutionary remedies, which require the breaching party to return any benefit received from the contract.
  • Reliance damages, compensating the non-breaching party for costs incurred in anticipation of contract performance.

These alternatives are more likely to be used when the non-breaching party cannot be fully restored through expectation damages alone, or when fairness or equity considerations are present.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is an efficient breach in simple terms?
    An efficient breach occurs when one party finds it more economically beneficial to breach a contract and compensate the other party than to fulfill the contract's terms.
  2. Is efficient breach legally allowed?
    Yes, courts often recognize efficient breach as lawful as long as the non-breaching party is fully compensated through expectation damages.
  3. Does efficient breach apply to all types of contracts?
    No, it is typically applied in commercial contexts. Contracts involving personal services or unique assets may be treated differently due to the difficulty of fully compensating losses.
  4. Why is efficient breach controversial?
    Critics argue it promotes strategic dishonesty, undermines trust, and assumes that all harms can be quantified and remedied with money.
  5. How does efficient breach relate to expectation damages?
    Efficient breach relies on expectation damages to ensure the non-breaching party is in the same position financially as if the contract had been fulfilled.

If you need help with understanding efficient breach, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel’s marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.