Key Takeaways

  • De Facto Contracts refer to agreements that, while lacking formalities, are still legally recognized if not violating any law or public policy.
  • De Facto Terminology outlines common uses of "de facto" in different legal contexts, such as de facto corporations or de facto marriage.
  • Practical Examples of de facto contracts are provided, including everyday business situations that form such agreements.
  • De Facto Partnerships highlight the potential legal risks of informal business arrangements, particularly regarding liability and ownership disputes.

A de facto contract refers to an agreement that is intended to convey property from one person to another but is defective in some way. One example is a contract that lacks consideration. A de facto contract is still legally binding as long as the agreement does not violate any law or public policy.

De Facto Terminology

You might hear the term de facto used in a variety of ways:

  • De facto is used to describe a government, an officer, a past action, or state of affairs that must be accepted for all practical purposes but is illegitimate or illegal. This includes a status, an office, or a position that exists under a claim or color of right, like a de facto corporation.
  • A de facto corporation is one that was given legal status even though it did not follow all statutory formalities as required by law to form a corporation. The state is the only one with the authority to challenge a de facto corporation's existence.
  • De facto is also used in the scenario “wife de facto,” in which a marriage is voidable by decree. This is different from a wife de jure, which is a lawful wife. The term de jure means legitimate, constitutional, or rightful.
  • Another use of de facto is with de facto segregation, in which members of different races are separated by a variety of social and economic factors, rather than by virtue of government statutes.

Understanding De Facto in Legal Contexts

The term de facto is used to describe situations, roles, or relationships that exist in practice, regardless of whether they are officially recognized or legally formalized. It applies in several contexts:

  • De Facto Corporation: A company that operates as a corporation despite failing to meet all legal formalities. In many cases, this status is legally recognized, and only the state can challenge it.
  • De Facto Marriage: A relationship that functions as a marriage without legal registration. Similar to de jure marriage, but often considered illegitimate or voidable.
  • De Facto Director: In businesses, an individual who assumes the role of a director without being formally appointed. This is common in family-run businesses or small companies where roles are fluid.

This understanding is critical when evaluating business structures, particularly in cases involving partnerships, corporate governance, and informal agreements like perjanjian de facto.

Frequently Asked Questions About De Facto Contracts

A number of questions might arise when it comes to understanding de facto contracts. One of the main questions revolves around a company that charges for food delivery. A consumer might question the delivery fee because the company's website advertises “no memberships, no contracts, no minimums.” What happens if you decide to order something from the company — are you agreeing to the fee? Does this violate the company's claim of no contracts?

The claim of no contracts means there is no agreement or standing written contract as it relates to delivering food, not the delivery fee. The delivery fee is what would likely be considered an “offer to treat,” or a unilateral contract. The former would be known as a “bilateral contract,” which is the most well-known type of contract, in which two parties make a promise or consideration.

Unilateral contracts are lesser-known, but also very common. For example, say you park your vehicle in a public parking lot or you buy a ticket for a sporting event. When you purchase the ticket, there are contractual implications, sometimes even included on the backside of the ticket. These are terms you did not negotiate, but by attending the event, you are fulfilling a condition precedent. This binds you to the offer's terms.

This method of thinking is also how the food delivery service operates. They deliver food based on a set fee you pay rather than a contract. When you place the food order, you are entering into a unilateral contract to pay the delivery fee.

Another question related to de facto contracts is whether there can be a de facto termination for convenience. This often relates to construction contracts. The right to terminate a contract for convenience without any fault on the contractor is typically reserved for project owners. An advanced written notice triggers the termination. The contractor will be paid:

  • The cost of any work performed before the termination.
  • Profit on the costs.
  • Termination expenses.

A termination for convenience will compensate the contractor for any work performed, while absolving the owner from a wrongful termination claim or liability for breach of contract.

There are also questions about what happens when relationships between contractors and owners start to break down, making it extremely toxic to the point they don't want to deal with each other altogether. Could this be a de facto termination of convenience? It is definitely questionable. At least in Connecticut, a court ruled it did not qualify as one. Instead, the project owner must make a formal request to terminate the contract in accordance with the contract's express terms.

Legal Implications of De Facto Contracts

A perjanjian de facto might be informal, but it still carries potential legal consequences. Below are a few scenarios illustrating the implications:

  • Partnerships Without Formal Contracts: In some cases, two or more people may begin working together toward a common goal without signing a formal agreement. Under certain circumstances, this may be treated as a de facto partnership, subjecting the parties to liability and other obligations as if they had a formal partnership agreement.
  • Unilateral Contracts: If one party offers terms (e.g., a service or product) and the other party accepts those terms by performance (e.g., purchasing the service), a de facto contract may arise even without a formal written agreement. This is common in everyday transactions like parking tickets or concert ticket purchases.
  • Liability Risks in De Facto Partnerships: As seen in the case of de facto partnerships, informal business arrangements can lead to significant legal disputes. Partners might find themselves responsible for each other's actions without proper documentation, exposing them to risks such as financial liabilities or legal accountability for injuries or damages caused by a partner's actions.

This highlights why formalizing business relationships is essential for avoiding unintended legal issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is a de facto contract?
    A de facto contract is an informal agreement that exists in practice, even though it may not meet the formalities required by law. It is enforceable as long as it doesn’t violate any legal principles.
  2. How does a de facto partnership form?
    A de facto partnership arises when two or more parties act toward a common goal, such as working on a business project together, without formalizing the relationship through a written agreement.
  3. Can a de facto contract have legal consequences?
    Yes, de facto contracts can lead to legal obligations, especially in cases involving liability, partnerships, or service agreements, even if they aren’t formally documented.
  4. How do de facto clauses appear in contracts?
    De facto clauses in contracts often state that no unintended legal relationships (such as a partnership or joint venture) will be formed unless explicitly stated, protecting the parties from unexpected legal obligations.
  5. Why is a de facto partnership risky?
    De facto partnerships are risky because they lack clear, written agreements. This ambiguity can lead to disputes over ownership, profit sharing, and liabilities, which may result in significant legal and financial issues.

If you need help understanding perjanjian de facto, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel only accepts the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.