Key Takeaways

  • The agency model definition explains the relationship where a principal delegates authority to an agent to act on their behalf.
  • Agency problems arise when incentives between principals and agents are misaligned, often due to information asymmetry or differing objectives.
  • Solutions include incentive-based contracts, performance-based pay, and regular oversight to align interests.
  • Real-world applications of agency models appear in employment, corporate governance, automotive distribution, and marketing agency structures.
  • Understanding the pros and cons of different agency arrangements helps businesses design effective agreements that minimize conflicts and maximize outcomes.

The principal-agent model definition stems from Black's Law Dictionary of 1999, which defines a principal as someone authorizing another person to act on their behalf as an agent. The principal-agent model appears in many contexts, including when an employee acts on an employer's behalf by receiving certain benefits as a result of the employee's actions.

Principal-Agent Models

A principal-agent model refers to the relationship between an asset owner or principal and the agent or person contracted to manage that asset on the owner's behalf. For example, if you own a small business and hire an outside contractor to complete a service, you enter into a principal-agent relationship.

The main element in the principal-agent model is trust. You trust that both you and the agent acting on your behalf have the same incentives. Conflicts in those incentives arise and create what's known as a principal-agent problem.

Problems can occur when:

  • Agents have hidden agendas and substitute their own objectives for what the principal wants
  • Asymmetrical information favors agents and makes it difficult for principals to monitor an agent's activities
  • Agents shirk responsibilities and work at less-than-optimal efficiency

Core Elements of the Agency Model

The agency model definition is rooted in the idea that one party (the principal) delegates authority to another (the agent) to perform tasks, make decisions, or represent them in business matters. At its core, this relationship is built on delegation, authority, accountability, and trust.

Key elements include:

  • Delegation of authority: The principal assigns specific responsibilities to the agent.
  • Decision-making power: The agent is often empowered to make decisions within a defined scope.
  • Fiduciary duty: The agent must act in the best interests of the principal, prioritizing those interests above their own.
  • Performance measurement: Success is measured based on how well the agent fulfills the principal’s objectives.

This model is widely used beyond employment relationships — including legal representation, real estate transactions, corporate management, and distribution agreements — because it allows specialization and efficiency while enabling principals to focus on strategic objectives.

The Principal-Agent Problem

Issues surrounding the principal-agent problem involve the separation of control that occurs when the principal hires an agent to act on their behalf, not to mention the costs incurred by the principal in dealing with the agent (i.e., agency costs). The principal-agent problem was first addressed in the 1970s by economic and institutional theorists. A paper in 1976 by Michael Jensen and William Meckling outlined a theory of ownership structure that would best avoid agency costs and the relationship issues present in the principal-agent model.

Agency costs come from setting up moral or monetary incentives to encourage an agent to act in a certain way. Unless the incentives align, a principal-agent problem occurs. In other words, the principal-agent problem arises when an agent agrees to work for the principal in return for an incentive, but the agreement may incur excessive costs for the agent and lead to conflicts of interest or moral hazards. This situation may encourage the agent to pursue their own agenda and ignore what's best for the principal.

For example, consider a roofer who charges by the hour. The roofer might realize that taking as much time as possible to complete the task will reap him higher monetary rewards, so he performs the jobs slowly to bill more hours. Since the client doesn't know anything about roofing, they are powerless to prevent being taken advantage of. Although the client's roof gets fixed, they pay more than necessary because the roofer took his time.

Types of Agency Costs and Risks

Agency costs refer to the expenses incurred by principals to ensure agents act in alignment with their goals. These costs typically fall into three categories:

  1. Monitoring costs: Expenses related to supervising and evaluating the agent’s actions, such as audits or compliance programs.
  2. Bonding costs: Incentives or guarantees provided by the agent to assure the principal of their commitment, such as insurance or performance bonds.
  3. Residual loss: The value lost when the agent’s decisions deviate from the principal’s interests despite monitoring and incentives.

Agency risks often stem from information asymmetry, where the agent knows more than the principal, and moral hazard, where the agent acts in self-interest because the principal cannot fully observe their behavior. These risks are especially prevalent in complex corporate structures, investment management, and service contracts.

Eliminating the Principal-Agent Problem

One of the best ways to deal with the principal-agent problem is to pay for services by the project instead of the hour. If the roofing contractor knows he'll make a certain amount of money for fixing the roof regardless of how long it takes, he'll perform the job more quickly. The key to eliminating the principal-agent problem is all about finding any conflict of incentives and getting rid of them.

You can eliminate the principal-agent problem by drawing up a solid labor contract. If the contract between the principal and agent provides a fixed wage regardless of the worker's effort, the worker won't have an incentive to work hard. The better solution is to make the wage dependent on the agent's effort, which can be difficult if the principal isn't there to monitor the agent's activities.

Strategies to Align Incentives

Successfully addressing agency conflicts involves designing systems that align the agent’s motivations with the principal’s objectives. Effective strategies include:

  • Performance-based compensation: Linking agent pay to specific metrics, such as revenue growth or project milestones.
  • Equity participation: Granting agents ownership stakes to align long-term interests.
  • Clear reporting mechanisms: Establishing regular communication and transparent performance reviews to reduce information gaps.
  • Limited decision-making scope: Defining clear boundaries for the agent’s authority reduces opportunities for self-serving actions.
  • Reputation-based contracts: Relying on agents with strong track records incentivizes continued ethical performance.

By combining contractual design with oversight and incentives, principals can significantly reduce the likelihood of agency-related conflicts.

Examples of Principal-Agent Problems

One common example of the principal-agent problem occurs between hiring companies and agencies that set credit ratings. Since low ratings increase the borrowing costs for a company, the company is incentivized is to structure compensation in such a way that the rating agency provides a higher rating than the company might deserve. As such, the rating is not objective.

If you take your car to be serviced, you're at a disadvantage because the agent, or mechanic, knows more about servicing cars than you do, so they may charge more.

A simpler example is if a principal asks an agent to purchase some ice cream without telling the agent which flavor they prefer. Despite the fact that both parties discussed the payment, number of scoops, and delivery of the ice cream, the agent can't pick the principal's preferred flavor because it was left out of the agreement.

Applications of the Agency Model in Business

The agency model extends far beyond traditional employment contexts. Understanding its applications can help organizations design more effective relationships:

  • Corporate governance: Shareholders (principals) rely on executives (agents) to run a company. Problems arise if executives pursue personal bonuses or perks instead of maximizing shareholder value.
  • Financial advisory: Clients hire financial advisors to manage assets. Conflicts occur if advisors recommend products that yield higher commissions rather than best-fit investments.
  • Automotive industry: Car manufacturers (principals) often use agency distribution models, where dealerships act as agents selling vehicles directly on behalf of the brand, creating consistent pricing and enhanced customer experience.
  • Marketing and consulting agencies: Businesses contract agencies to manage branding, advertising, or communications. Properly structured agreements ensure the agency’s success is directly tied to the client’s performance metrics.

These real-world examples highlight how diverse and impactful the agency model can be — and why carefully structuring principal-agent relationships is essential to long-term success.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the basic agency model definition?
    It’s a framework where a principal delegates authority to an agent to act on their behalf, usually to perform tasks, make decisions, or manage assets.
  2. Why do principal-agent problems occur?
    They occur due to conflicting incentives, lack of transparency, or unequal access to information between the principal and the agent.
  3. How can companies reduce agency costs?
    Companies can reduce costs by aligning incentives through performance-based pay, improving oversight, and establishing clear contractual terms.
  4. What industries commonly use the agency model?
    The model is common in corporate governance, finance, real estate, automotive distribution, and marketing services.
  5. How is an agency agreement different from a standard contract?
    While both are legally binding, an agency agreement specifically grants authority for one party to act on behalf of another, creating fiduciary obligations.

If you need help with the agency model definition, you can post your job on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.