Patent Abstract Rules and Best Practices
A patent abstract is a concise summary of an invention in a patent application. Learn rules, mistakes to avoid, and why clarity matters. 6 min read updated on September 24, 2025
Key Takeaways
- A patent abstract is a concise summary (≤150 words) that highlights the invention’s core purpose and technical contribution.
- It is required for all U.S. non-provisional applications and must be on a separate page, clearly labeled.
- Abstracts should avoid claims, legal jargon, comparisons, or marketing language.
- Mistakes include making it too vague, too detailed, or exceeding the word count—these can trigger USPTO objections.
- A strong abstract improves searchability in patent databases and may attract licensing interest.
- Courts can use abstracts to construe claims, so clarity and accuracy are critical.
- Abstract ideas themselves are not patentable; the abstract must summarize a practical, concrete invention.
A patent abstract is a short summary of the invention or idea that is seeking a patent through the application process.
What Is a Patent Abstract?
Under the rules of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), any and all applications for non-provisional patents must be submitted with an abstract. This is a written part of a patent application that can be prepared by the inventors themselves, or they can hire writers to draft abstracts for them.
This summary should be concise and should describe the invention that is discussed in the application. The idea behind an abstract is to take a step back from the details of the invention and write about its essence. This allows the USPTO to be able to tell what the application is about right away.
Abstracts should be taken seriously even though they are a just a short summary. Because it is part of the official application, the abstract can be used by the Federal Courts to construe claims.
The outline for patent abstracts provided by the USPTO should be followed when preparing the document.
Purpose of a Patent Abstract
The main purpose of a patent abstract is to give the public, examiners, and courts a quick overview of the invention without requiring them to read the full specification. Abstracts serve several functions:
- Search Tool: Patent offices and databases use abstracts as a quick reference point, helping researchers identify relevant prior art.
- Public Notice: They allow businesses and innovators to understand the general scope of an invention without delving into technical claims.
- Legal Reference: Courts may refer to the abstract to aid in construing claims, although it cannot override the actual claim language.
An effective abstract strikes a balance—clear enough to be understood by non-experts but precise enough to reflect the essence of the invention.
Basic Rules for a Patent Abstract
A patent abstract, also called an abstract of the disclosure, should follow these rules:
- The abstract must be included in the application on its own sheet of paper proceeding the claim section and must be clearly labeled.
- The abstract must consist of 150 words or less.
- The abstract must clearly give the basic idea and nature of the invention disclosed in the technical part of the application.
As an applicant is preparing his documents to apply for a patent for his invention, he should reference the Manual of Patent Examination Procedure rules and specifications to be sure that he is handling everything properly.
Any abstracts that do not meet the proper requirements can be rejected by the office and sent back to the applicant for corrections. The application process for patents can be quite long even when everything is done correctly and runs smoothly, so getting all of the pieces right the first time is ideal.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
Patent abstracts often fail when applicants overlook USPTO rules or add unnecessary details. Some common pitfalls include:
- Exceeding the word limit (more than 150 words).
- Being too short, making the invention unclear.
- Using vague or promotional language, such as “revolutionary” or “novel.”
- Including claims or comparisons to prior inventions, which belong in other sections.
- Overly technical jargon, making the abstract hard to read for general audiences.
Applicants should also avoid leading phrases like “This abstract describes…”. The abstract should start directly with the invention’s function or structure.
Is an Abstract Necessary?
Abstracts are used first by the office when looking through patent applications and getting an idea for what's what. They are also helpful when others are searching the patent application database.
A good abstract can attract companies and individuals for potential patent licenses. Many times, the abstract is the only part of the application a person will read when searching through the database.
Anyone with a basic understanding of the patents field of work should be able to read its abstract. By reading the abstract, anyone should be able to learn what the invention is and what purpose it plays. From there, a reader will decide if he wants to read more in-depth into the application.
Think of a patent abstract like the front page of a magazine. Anyone looking at the cover of a magazine can quickly get a gist for what it's about and what purpose it serves.
Abstracts do not need to mention claims or their scope. This isn't the legal part of the application, so leave that topic out.
Patent Abstracts vs. Abstract Ideas
It’s important not to confuse a patent abstract with the concept of an “abstract idea.” In patent law, especially under 35 U.S.C. § 101, abstract ideas (such as mathematical formulas or generic business practices) are not patentable. This principle was reaffirmed in cases like Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank (2014) and continues to shape patent eligibility today.
The distinction is clear:
- A patent abstract is a short written summary of an invention in an application.
- An abstract idea refers to a non-patentable concept that lacks a specific, practical application.
Thus, while every patent application needs a patent abstract, the invention itself must be more than an abstract idea to qualify for protection.
Why the Office Might Object to an Abstract
There are a handful of reasons why an abstract could be rejected by the USPTO. Some of the most common reasons include:
- It was not put on a separate sheet of paper.
- It was too short (fewer than 50 words) or went over the 150-word limit.
- It didn't use the appropriate language.
- It didn't describe the invention properly.
A patent abstract should not be longer than one paragraph. Sometimes this can be hard to accomplish. A second pair of eyes is always helpful, so consider asking a colleague to read over it if it's too long and suggest what can be taken out to reach the proper length.
Patent abstracts shouldn't use too much legal jargon. Leave the legal language for the claims section. Abstract language should be easy to understand and should get right to the point. Try not to lead into what the abstract is saying with phrases like, "This abstract of disclosure describes," or "This abstract concerns."
There is no need to discuss anything in the abstract other than the invention disclosed in the patent application. Don't take time to compare it to other inventions or comment on its marketability or need for patent protection. You should merely describe the invention while highlighting what makes it original and functional.
Best Practices for Drafting Abstracts
To reduce the risk of rejection or delay, follow these best practices when preparing a patent abstract:
- Focus on the core contribution. Identify the invention’s purpose and key features.
- Use plain language. Aim for clarity rather than legal or technical complexity.
- Limit to one paragraph. A concise abstract demonstrates professionalism and compliance.
- Avoid redundancy. Do not repeat the title or claim language.
- Highlight utility. Emphasize how the invention solves a problem or improves existing solutions.
Reviewing USPTO guidelines and having a colleague or attorney review your draft can ensure compliance and readability.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
What is the difference between a patent abstract and a patent claim?
A patent abstract summarizes the invention in plain terms, while claims define the legal scope of protection. -
How long should a patent abstract be?
The USPTO requires abstracts to be no longer than 150 words and typically written as a single paragraph. -
Can a poor abstract hurt my patent application?
Yes. While it won’t invalidate the application, a vague or noncompliant abstract can delay examination or weaken clarity for courts and licensees. -
Are abstract ideas ever patentable?
No. Abstract ideas such as mathematical algorithms or generic business methods are excluded from patent protection unless tied to a specific, practical application. -
Do foreign patent offices require abstracts too?
Yes. Most international patent offices, including the European Patent Office (EPO), require abstracts, though word count rules and formatting may vary.
If you need help with patent abstract, you can post your job on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.