Key Takeaways

  • Mala in se crimes are offenses considered inherently wrong, such as murder, rape, and theft, regardless of whether a statute prohibits them.
  • Mala prohibita crimes are wrong because laws prohibit them, such as traffic violations or regulatory offenses.
  • Historically, mala in se crimes carried the harshest punishments, often death, reflecting their moral weight.
  • Modern courts no longer rely heavily on the classification but instead focus on intent, severity, and statutory guidelines.
  • Moral values still influence public perception and sentencing, even though legal systems prioritize statutory frameworks.

Mala in se (the singular is malum in se) is a term that signifies crime that is considered wrong in and of itself. The phrase is Latin and literally means wrong in itself. This class of crime is contrasted by crimes mala prohibita, the Latin term for "wrong because they are prohibited."

The distinguishing characteristic of crimes mala in se is not their severity, but that the citizenry feels they are morally wrong in and of themselves, and require no outside reasons to prove or justify their wrongness. For the most part, these are crimes that directly and visibly harm other people and their property, since it's traditionally these kinds of crimes that inspire the most fervent moral outrage.

Historical Punishment for Mala In Se

Essentially all of the crimes identified in the old British common law system — the system which forms the foundation of criminal law in the United States — are identified as crimes mala in se. The punishment for these offenses was quite uniform: death. Of course, the opinions and practices of our society have changed over the centuries, and today's petty thieves no longer need fear the executioner's noose.

Examples of Crimes Mala In Se

Crimes classified as mala in se typically involve conduct universally condemned because it violates fundamental moral standards. Common examples include:

  • Murder – taking another person’s life is viewed as inherently immoral.
  • Rape and sexual assault – violations of bodily autonomy and human dignity.
  • Robbery and burglary – intrusions on personal security and property rights.
  • Assault and battery – direct physical harm to another person.
  • Arson – destruction of property that endangers lives.

These offenses are recognized across cultures and legal systems as naturally wrongful, distinguishing them from mala prohibita crimes, which depend on specific statutory prohibitions.

Are They Treated Differently Today?

While crimes mala in se remain, in general, the more heinous species of crime compared to crimes mala prohibita, they do not necessarily incur the heavier punishments (for example, a third drunk-driving conviction will warrant a much heavier punishment than a first-time conviction of petty larceny).

It is worth mentioning that this classification, "bad in itself," does not have very much official influence in modern criminal procedure. Technically, it matters very little in today's courts whether a crime is considered wrong in itself or whether it is wrong by statutory legislation. Instead, weight is placed on the defendant's history, the intention behind the defendant's actions, whether the crime was misdemeanor or felony and to what degree, and so on. "Mala in se" and "mala prohibita" are, it might be said, artifacts from the middle ages of Europe, which are preserved largely for their historical value.

Mala In Se vs. Mala Prohibita

Understanding the difference between mala in se and mala prohibita is central to lectl crimes mala in se criminal law crime classifications.

  • Mala in se: Acts considered evil by their very nature, such as homicide or theft. These crimes tend to have universal recognition.
  • Mala prohibita: Acts that are unlawful only because a statute declares them so, such as jaywalking, gambling, or licensing violations.

This distinction helps explain why two individuals may face very different social and legal consequences for breaking the law, even if punishments under statutes overlap. Mala prohibita crimes are often regulatory, while mala in se crimes involve serious moral blameworthiness.

The Importance of Moral Values in Law

Nevertheless, the moral feelings of the citizenry should not be overlooked while trying to understand the way that crime is classified and punished in the United States. While it would seem contrary for a society that prides itself as "a nation of laws" to agree that any crime is wrong in itself, rather than because it is against the law, there are not many people who would cite the law while explaining why rape is wrong.

Modern Role of Crime Classifications

In modern courts, the formal distinction between mala in se and mala prohibita carries limited procedural weight. However, the classification still shapes how society perceives certain offenses. Juries, judges, and lawmakers often rely on these moral foundations when assessing punishment severity, sentencing guidelines, or parole eligibility.

Legal scholars also emphasize that mala in se crimes provide a framework for understanding why some crimes consistently attract harsher public condemnation and longer sentences. For example, even where statutory punishments overlap, violent offenses tend to draw stricter penalties than regulatory violations.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What does “mala in se” mean in criminal law?
    It means “wrong in itself,” referring to crimes universally recognized as immoral, such as murder, rape, or theft.
  2. How are mala in se crimes different from mala prohibita crimes?
    Mala in se crimes are inherently wrong, while mala prohibita crimes are wrong only because laws prohibit them, like traffic violations or licensing issues.
  3. Do modern courts still use the classification of mala in se?
    While the classification has limited procedural weight today, it still influences how society views certain crimes and can impact sentencing severity.
  4. What are some examples of mala in se crimes?
    Examples include homicide, robbery, arson, sexual assault, and assault.
  5. Why are moral values important in classifying crimes?
    Because society’s shared moral beliefs shape which acts are considered inherently wrong, and these values influence both legislation and judicial outcomes.

If you need help with understanding Crimes Mala In Se, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.