Key Takeaways

  • Consent in criminal defense can excuse otherwise criminal acts if it is freely and legally given, but it has strict limits.
  • Valid consent must be voluntary, informed, and given by someone with legal capacity. Consent obtained through fraud, coercion, or duress is invalid.
  • In many states, consent is only a defense for crimes that do not involve serious bodily injury or conduct forbidden by law or public policy.
  • Courts often limit the consent defense in sexual assault, assault, and homicide cases, particularly when public safety is at risk.
  • Written, verbal, or implied consent may be recognized depending on the circumstances, but silence alone is rarely sufficient unless context supports it.

Consent

Consent may be used as a defense in the criminal law - similar to consent in tort law - when the victim might reasonably be shown to have consented to the defendant's actions. This defense can only be valid when the defendant's action is not strictly forbidden by statute, as is the case with many strict liability crimes and so-called consensual crimes (e.g., prostitution may be consensual, but the lady's consent in this case usually doesn't make the act legal). Consent may be given either in written or verbal form and, in certain circumstances, silence can also qualify as consent.

An example of a situation in which consent might hold as a defense would be an employer telling his clerk to take some money from the register and get a little something for himself. The clerk does as he's told and buys himself a pair of jeans. If the clerk's employer later, for some reason, tries to bring criminal charges for larceny against him, then consent might be employed by the clerk's defense council.

There are some situations in which consent cannot, as a rule, be used as a defense in criminal trial. First of all, if the person who gave consent is legally incompetent in the matter at hand and has no authority to give consent, the defense probably won't stand (for example, on clerk authorizing another to take money out of the register when he really has no authority to do so). Also, consent cannot be used as a defense if the victim is incapable of making a reasonable decision because of youth, mental disability, intoxication, or some other defect. Consent is no defense if it was induced by force or duress. And, as mentioned above, consent is irrelevant in cases where the behavior is forbidden by public policy, as is often the case in the U.S. with gambling and prostitution.

When Consent Cannot Be Used

Courts have consistently found that consent is not a defense in certain contexts:

  • Homicide cases – A person cannot legally consent to their own death. Assisting suicide or engaging in lethal activities cannot be justified by consent.
  • Incapacitation – If the victim was unconscious, intoxicated, or otherwise incapable of understanding the nature of the act, consent is legally impossible.
  • Crimes protecting broader society – Gambling, drug trafficking, and prostitution are prohibited regardless of consent because public policy aims to prevent broader harm.

Consent in Assault and Contact Sports

Consent often arises as a defense in assault cases. A common example is contact sports: players consent to a reasonable degree of physical contact inherent in the game. However, excessive force outside the scope of ordinary play (such as a deliberate off-the-ball attack) is not excused by consent. Courts balance the expectation of risk with the severity of the harm caused.

Limits on the Consent Defense

While consent may negate criminal liability in some cases, there are important limitations:

  1. Serious bodily injury – Most jurisdictions prohibit consent as a defense when the act results in serious bodily harm. For example, agreeing to a fistfight does not necessarily shield the aggressor from assault charges if severe injuries result.
  2. Illegal acts and public policy – Consent is not valid if it attempts to legalize conduct forbidden by statute or against public policy, such as prostitution, illegal drug use, or dueling.
  3. Sex crimes – In sexual assault cases, courts strictly examine consent. It must be affirmative, knowing, and ongoing. Incapacitation due to drugs, alcohol, or unconsciousness automatically invalidates consent.
  4. Fraud or coercion – Consent obtained through threats, deception, or manipulation is not valid in criminal law.

Valid Consent Requirements

For consent to serve as a defense in criminal law, it must meet certain conditions:

  • Voluntary and informed: Consent must be given freely, without coercion or deception.
  • Legal capacity: The person giving consent must have the mental ability and legal authority to do so. Minors, intoxicated persons, or individuals with significant cognitive impairments may not provide valid consent.
  • Scope of consent: The defendant’s conduct must fall within what was reasonably agreed to. If the act exceeds the scope of consent (for example, an agreed-upon sports activity that turns excessively violent), the defense may fail.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Is silence considered consent in criminal law?
    Not usually. Silence may imply consent in limited contexts, but courts generally require clear verbal or non-verbal communication of agreement.
  2. Can someone consent to being assaulted?
    Only to a limited extent, such as in sports or minor scuffles. Serious bodily harm or reckless violence usually invalidates consent as a defense.
  3. Can minors legally consent in criminal defense cases?
    Generally, no. The law presumes that minors lack the capacity to provide valid consent in most criminal contexts, especially sexual activity.
  4. Does consent excuse criminal liability in sex crimes?
    Consent can be a defense, but it must be informed, voluntary, and ongoing. If the alleged victim was incapacitated or coerced, the defense fails.
  5. Why is consent not valid in certain crimes like prostitution or gambling?
    Because these crimes are prohibited on public policy grounds. Even if all parties agree, the law treats the conduct as harmful to society at large.

If you need help with understanding Lectl Consent Criminal Defense, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel’s marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.