Key Takeaways

  • A fixed price contract sets a predetermined payment for work completed, protecting buyers from cost overruns.
  • These contracts work best when the scope of work, deliverables, and costs can be clearly defined upfront.
  • Contractors carry the risk of unexpected costs but gain higher profit potential through efficient performance.
  • Variations like Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Fixed Price Incentive Fee (FPIF), and Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FPEPA) allow flexibility for specific project needs.
  • Strong contract management and clear specifications are critical to minimize disputes and delays.

A firm fixed price contract lays out a set fee to be paid to a contractor for completing a specific job. This fixed price cannot be changed under any circumstances, which can pose a potential risk to the contractor if a project is not managed well.

Fixed Price (FFP) Contract

According to FAR Subpart 16.2, a firm fixed price contract includes a set fee that cannot be changed. This is even if the contractor incurs costs that exceed the target cost outlined in the contract. This is the riskiest type of contract from the contractor's point of view because it requires the contractor to assume all responsibility for the financial aspects of a project, including:  

  • Project costs  
  • Potential profits  
  • Potential losses.

However, a firm fixed price contract usually provides contractors with a high level of incentive to:

  • Properly control the cost of a job.
  • Make sure the job is carried out effectively. 

Contracts of this nature pose minimal risk to the client because the contractor is highly motivated to keep costs low and the performance high. 

Contracting officers also have the option to use firm fixed price contracts in combination with the following when the incentive fee is calculated using factors other than the cost of a project:  

  • Award Fee Incentive, as outlined in FAR Subpart 16.404  
  • Delivery incentives.  

While these supplementary agreements allow for additional incentives to be paid under certain circumstances, the contract will still be a firm fixed price contract.

Types of Fixed Price Contracts

While a firm fixed price (FFP) contract is the most common, several other types of fixed price agreements exist to balance risk and reward between the buyer and seller:

  1. Fixed Price Incentive Fee (FPIF):
    Allows for performance-based adjustments. The contractor earns additional compensation for meeting or exceeding specified cost, schedule, or performance targets.
  2. Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FPEPA):
    Incorporates clauses that account for changes in labor, materials, or inflation rates. This is useful for long-term projects where costs may fluctuate.
  3. Fixed Price Award Fee (FPAF):
    Offers the contractor potential bonus payments based on government or client evaluation of performance.
  4. Fixed Ceiling Price Contracts:
    Used when exact costs cannot be precisely estimated, these contracts include a “not-to-exceed” price cap, with any cost above it borne by the contractor.

These variations help organizations choose the structure that best aligns with their project’s uncertainty, performance expectations, and risk tolerance.

Benefits of Firm Fixed Contracts

Firm fixed price contracts are generally useful when attempting to obtain commercial items, supplies, or services based on their reasonably detailed specifications. This occurs when the parties involved can agree on reasonable fees at the beginning. 

Examples of situations in which a firm fixed price contract may be appropriate, according to FAR Subpart 16.202-2, include:  

  • When there is significant pricing competition.  
  • When there have been similar purchases made to compare pricing to.  
  • When available information makes it possible to estimate possible costs realistically.
  • When uncertainties can be properly identified and addressed.  
  • When the contractor is willing to accept the risks.

When to Use a Fixed Price Contract

A fixed price contract is ideal when:

  • The project scope is clearly defined: Requirements, timelines, and deliverables are measurable and unlikely to change.
  • Historical cost data is available: Prior similar work provides reliable benchmarks for estimating fair pricing.
  • Risks are minimal or well understood: Projects with low uncertainty benefit most, such as manufacturing, construction, or software implementations with detailed specifications.
  • Contractor control is high: When the contractor can manage costs, suppliers, and efficiency independently.

These contracts are less suited for research, development, or agile projects where costs and deliverables evolve over time.

Contractors Generally Assume the Risk of Higher Costs

In most cases, a contractor does not have a full understanding of the implications a firm fixed price contract can have. Agility Defense and Government Services, formerly known as Taos Industries learned about some of these implications in a rather difficult way.

In this case, the US government hired the contractor (Agility) under a firm fixed price indefinite quantity contract to deliver weapons to support missions the United States Army was carrying out in Afghanistan. This contract was awarded in December of 2007 for the price of $1.3 million. The contract set forth a required delivery deadline by April 7, 2008. 

Agility attempted to obtain the required weapons from companies located in Hungary and Bulgaria. However, both countries' governments refused to allow the weapons to be released. Two years later, in April 2010, Agility had still failed to deliver the weapons as they were contractually obligated to do.

At this time, the government and Agility signed an agreement that acknowledged the contractor would not be able to meet the required delivery date in the original contract. In addition, the contractor would provide a second delivery of different weapons as a consideration for its late delivery. The delivery date for the originally requested weapons was marked as "to be determined" at this time. 

The following year, Agility had still not delivered any of the weapons they were contractually obligated to provide. In March 2001, both parties signed a second modification agreement that outlined a firm delivery date for the weapons, dependent on the United States Army. However, there was never any change made to the originally agreed upon price set forth in the contract.

Agility was finally able to deliver on the original request in December 2011 and requested an adjustment of $1.4 million to their service fee because of the fact that they had experienced a large number of additional costs. This was due to the actions of outside parties that were beyond the contractor's control. When their original request was denied, Agility filed a second, certified claim for adjustment. This second request was also denied, which lead to a long, hard legal battle for Agility.

Best Practices for Managing Fixed Price Contracts

To ensure success under a fixed price contract, both parties should follow key management practices:

  • Develop a detailed statement of work (SOW): Define deliverables, performance criteria, and timelines clearly to reduce ambiguity.
  • Include contingency planning: Anticipate potential risks and allocate allowances or adjustment clauses where appropriate.
  • Maintain regular communication: Periodic check-ins prevent misunderstandings and allow early issue resolution.
  • Use contract management tools: Software can track milestones, payments, and compliance efficiently.
  • Conduct performance reviews: Objective metrics ensure the contractor meets quality and delivery standards.

These best practices minimize disputes and help align expectations between client and contractor.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fixed Price Contracts

Advantages:

  • Budget predictability: The buyer knows the total cost upfront, aiding financial planning.
  • Performance motivation: Contractors are incentivized to control costs and meet deadlines efficiently to preserve profit margins.
  • Simplified oversight: Since payments are predetermined, administrative tracking is more straightforward.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited flexibility: Any change to scope may require a contract amendment, delaying the project.
  • Risk to contractors: Unexpected cost increases or delays can erode or eliminate profits.
  • Potential quality issues: Some contractors may cut corners to maintain margins under rigid pricing structures.

Balancing clear specifications with fair pricing terms helps mitigate these downsides while maintaining project quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the main purpose of a fixed price contract? It defines a total project price upfront, transferring most cost risk to the contractor while giving the buyer budget certainty.

2. How does a fixed price contract differ from a cost-reimbursable contract? A cost-reimbursable contract covers actual costs plus a fee, while a fixed price contract pre-sets payment regardless of final cost.

3. When should you avoid a fixed price contract? Avoid it when project scope, timeline, or costs are uncertain—such as in R&D or complex, evolving work.

4. What protections exist for contractors in fixed price agreements? They may negotiate clauses for economic price adjustment or performance-based bonuses to offset risks.

5. Can a fixed price contract be modified after signing? Yes, but only through a formal modification or change order, typically agreed upon in writing by both parties.

If you need help with a firm fixed price contract, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.