Key Takeaways

  • A controlling shareholder holds significant influence over company decisions, often with less than 50% ownership.
  • They can appoint directors, influence mergers, and shape strategic direction.
  • Legal duties include fairness to minority shareholders and avoiding conflicts of interest.
  • Enhanced judicial scrutiny applies to controlling shareholder transactions, especially in self-dealing or freeze-out mergers.
  • Tax and legal definitions may vary by jurisdiction, affecting regulatory compliance.

A controlling shareholder, also known as a controlling interest, is a shareholder who owns the largest number of a company's outstanding shares. An entity may be a controlling shareholder in any of the following scenarios:

  • An individual can be a controlling shareholder if he/she owns a significant number of a company's outstanding shares, even though the percentage is not a majority.
  • An individual belongs to a group of shareholders that hold a majority of the stock of a company.
  • An individual or person who belongs to a group (such as a consortium or family) that has control over the affairs of a company for reasons other than ownership of shares.
  • A separate company that buys a majority of the stock in a company, effectively making the latter its subsidiary and gaining majority control over its affairs.

What is a Controlling Interest?

A shareholder or group of shareholders acting collectively have a controlling interest if they own the majority of shares in a company. Often, the individual or group that holds 50 percent plus one of the stocks in a company has the controlling interest. However, shareholders with less than 50 percent of the stocks can also have a controlling interest as long as they own enough stocks to vote at shareholders' meetings.

This is more evident in publicly owned companies where a large number of individuals and groups own enough stock to make meaningful contributions to the company's decisions and can even lobby for seats on the board of directors.

Example of Controlling Interest

An excellent example of controlling interest was how Michael Dell, with the help of a group of investors, bought a majority stake in Dell Technologies after he was forced out of his position as the CEO of the company. After getting back control of his company, Dell was able to make far-reaching decisions to solidify his position without any opposition from minority stakeholders.

Minority Control and Effective Influence

In some cases, a shareholder may exercise control without majority ownership, especially when the remaining shares are widely dispersed. For instance, owning just 30% of shares may grant effective control if no other shareholder has significant holdings.

These situations often arise in public companies where passive investors or fragmented ownership structures give disproportionate influence to a single large shareholder. This type of “minority control” can be strategic but may also attract regulatory or shareholder scrutiny if used to dominate decisions without formal oversight.

Benefits of Owning Controlling Interest in a Company

Some of the benefits of a controlling interest include:

  • The shareholder(s) with a controlling interest in a company has the power to choose the direction of the company's short and long-term goals by overturning any decision that does not tally with their positions.
  • With the immense power that comes with a majority vote, a shareholder with controlling interest can become the chairman of the board of directors, a position which allows them to hire or fire the most senior people in the organization and make weighty decisions without any opposition.
  • A controlling interest can choose who becomes a member of the board of directors.
  • A controlling shareholder has the power to protect his/her majority stake in the company should the organization be faced with a merger or acquisition in the future.
  • A controlling shareholder enjoys the largest share of rewards when the company is making a profit.
  • It makes management more effective as the controlling interest is always on high alert to block any mismanagement that could adversely affect their investments.

Disadvantages of Controlling Interest

  • Due to the size of their investment, the majority shareholders are the worst hit when the company is facing bad times.
  • There is usually a conflict of interest as many controlling shareholders only look out for their pockets, forgetting minority shareholders. This is why there are checks and balances such as the entire-fairness standard of review to ensure that controlling shareholders don't abuse their privileges.
  • Controlling shareholders leave little room for independent-minded directors to avoid losing their control of the organization.
  • Controlling shareholders sometimes use their position to force minority shareholders out of the company.

Risks of Abuse and Legal Remedies

Controlling shareholders may face claims of oppression or breach of fiduciary duty if they use their position to harm minority shareholders. Common risks include:

  • Siphoning corporate assets for personal benefit.
  • Diluting minority interests through unfair stock issuances.
  • Forcing minority shareholder exits below fair value (freeze-outs).

Legal remedies available to minority shareholders include:

  • Derivative lawsuits filed on behalf of the corporation.
  • Appraisal rights to obtain fair value in mergers.
  • Injunctions or rescission of unfair transactions.

Courts typically examine whether the controlling shareholder upheld duties of loyalty, good faith, and fair dealing in executing their actions.

What Are the Duties of Controlling Shareholders in the Minority?

  • Transactions of shareholders with a controlling interest above or less than 50 percent of the outstanding stocks of a company must pass the entire-fairness review.
  • Dual approval from independent directors and independent shareholders should be a precondition to the transactions of controlling shareholders where the fear of breaches is high, as in the case of mergers.
  • Controlling shareholders are trustees of the company and its minority shareholders. They must protect the rights of shareholders.

Controlling shareholders play a significant role in the success or failure of public and private companies. While the position offers power and influence to make weighty decisions, it can also be a huge trap when the company is facing trying times.

Legal Definition and Tax Considerations

The legal definition of a controlling shareholder may vary by jurisdiction and can impact tax obligations and reporting requirements.

For example, under Portland, Oregon's tax code, a controlling shareholder includes anyone who:

  • Owns more than 50% of the total combined voting power of all stock classes.
  • Has effective control through ownership or contractual rights.
  • Belongs to a group acting collectively to control business decisions.

This definition is used to determine tax liabilities, licensing requirements, and how control is attributed among corporate owners. Companies should consult local regulations to ensure compliance.

Enhanced Scrutiny in Controlling Shareholder Transactions

When a controlling shareholder engages in a transaction involving the company—such as a merger, acquisition, or sale of assets—the courts may apply enhanced judicial scrutiny to evaluate whether the transaction was fair to minority shareholders.

Under Delaware law, for instance, courts use the entire fairness standard, which assesses both:

  • Fair dealing: Was the process transparent, with full disclosure and adequate negotiation?
  • Fair price: Was the price reasonable and in line with market value?

To mitigate this scrutiny, companies often adopt dual protections:

  • Approval by an independent committee of the board.
  • Approval by a majority of disinterested shareholders.

These protections help demonstrate that the transaction was not coercive and was substantively fair, which can shift the burden of proof away from the controlling shareholder in litigation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Can someone be a controlling shareholder with less than 50% ownership?
    Yes. If their shareholding is large enough to influence decisions due to dispersed ownership or coalition-building, they can be deemed controlling.
  2. What is the “entire fairness” standard?
    It’s a legal test used in Delaware and other jurisdictions to assess whether a transaction involving a controlling shareholder is fair in both process and price.
  3. Are controlling shareholders subject to fiduciary duties?
    Yes. They must act in the best interests of the corporation and minority shareholders, avoiding conflicts and self-dealing.
  4. How can companies protect minority shareholders in related-party transactions?
    By requiring approval from an independent board committee and a majority of disinterested shareholders.
  5. What happens if a controlling shareholder abuses their power?
    Minority shareholders may seek legal remedies such as damages, injunctive relief, or reversal of transactions if the conduct breached fiduciary duties.

If you need help with controlling shareholder, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.