Key Takeaways

  • A bill of exception is a formal legal objection used to preserve issues for appellate review when they are not otherwise part of the trial record.
  • It must clearly state the objectionable ruling or error and must be presented, signed, and sealed by the trial judge.
  • Bills of exception are primarily used in civil cases but have historical and limited criminal application in some jurisdictions.
  • Timing is crucial—filing typically must occur during or immediately after trial and before the final judgment.
  • A signed bill becomes part of the record, enabling the appellate court to consider the alleged error.
  • Variations in procedure exist across jurisdictions, and some states have abolished the requirement entirely in favor of simplified rules of appeal.

A bill of exceptions is a legal law. The definition of a bill of exceptions is when a legal pleading is filed that is about a complaint on an appeal that would not be on record for the matter. This statement is concerning a disagreement, that is given to a judge to look over and objects a decision that has been made. A certain form or amount of words are not needed on a bill of exceptions. The trial court needs to know about the complaint by the information specifically stated in the bill of exceptions to be valid.

Bill of Exceptions

The bill of exceptions can be used as evidence once it's in the records as such. The judge can sign and file the bill with the trial court clerk once all parties are in agreement with what is stated in the bill of exceptions. The purpose of the bill of exceptions is to question the law, especially to make aware a mistake that has been made. The Westminster 2, 13 Ed. I. c. 31 allows the bill of exceptions, which is followed all the states in the Union.

Purpose and Function of a Bill of Exception

A bill of exception serves as a procedural safeguard for litigants to ensure that objections made during trial are documented and preserved for appellate review. It is particularly useful when an error is alleged that might not appear in the formal record of proceedings.

In practice, the bill identifies the specific objection, the context in which it arose, and the legal grounds for the objection. Once signed by the trial judge and incorporated into the record, the appellate court can evaluate whether the trial court’s ruling was legally correct.

This tool plays a key role in ensuring fairness, especially in complex litigation where evidentiary or procedural issues may significantly affect the outcome.

Bill Details

The bill is made as follows:

  • "When one impleaded before any of the justices, alleges an exception praying they will allow it, and if they will not, if he that alleges the exception writes the same, and requires 'that the justices will put their seals, the justices shall do so, and if one will not, another, shall;"
  • "And if, upon complaint made of the justice, the king cause the record to come before him, and the exception be not found in the roll, and the plaintiff show the written exception, with the seal of the justices thereto put, the justice shall be commanded to appear at a certain day, either to confess or deny his seal, and if he cannot deny his seal, they shall proceed to judgment according to the exception, as it ought to be allowed or disallowed."

The law applies to both the defendant and plaintiff. Burr details the bill of exceptions form in 1692. Previous similar cases include:

  • Bull. N. P. 317
  • Brownlow's Entries; Latine Redivio
  • 129; Trials per pais
  • 222, 3; 4 Yeates, 317
  • 18; 2 Yeates
  • 295, 6. 485
  • 6; 1 Morgan's Vade Mecum
  • 471-5

Special verdicts are a little different materially than bills of exception, as stated in 2 Bin. 92. There are also differences in the court opinions which should be filed, as stated in 10 S. & R. 114, 15.

The following will be considered:

  • Bill of exception cases that are valid
  • The time it takes to make the exception
  • The bill's form
  • The bill's effect

A bill of exception can only be used in a civil case. A judge may have to seal a bill of exceptions if he or she is found at fault for making a wrong decision in a court of law, whether the decision was made to the jury or while making a verdict in court. A bill of exceptions does not have to be sealed by a judge in criminal cases. In New York, the defendant can file a bill of exceptions for the trial of any charge. The bill needs to be signed, sealed, and filed with the clerk of the court.

Bill of Exception in Criminal Proceedings

Although bills of exception are traditionally used in civil litigation, they also have limited applications in criminal trials. In jurisdictions that still permit their use in criminal cases, a defendant may file a bill of exception to preserve alleged errors for appeal, such as:

  • Improper jury instructions
  • Evidentiary rulings that infringe on due process
  • Denial of constitutional motions or objections

Some states, like Texas and New York historically, allowed criminal defendants to use bills of exception, but their relevance has diminished with the evolution of more modern appellate procedures.

Importantly, the judge is not always required to seal a bill of exception in criminal cases unless it relates to certain appealable rulings. Instead, the objection may be preserved through other formal motions or transcript notations.

Procedural Requirements and Timing

The filing of a bill of exception must follow a precise timeline and format:

  • Timeliness: Most jurisdictions require the bill to be submitted before the judgment is entered or within a designated time thereafter, often governed by statute or court rule.
  • Content Requirements: The bill should include:
    • A clear description of the event or ruling being objected to
    • The specific grounds for objection
    • Any relevant facts or procedural background
  • Judicial Action: The trial judge must:
    • Review the accuracy of the bill
    • Sign or “settle” the bill if it accurately reflects the events
    • Seal the bill to affirm its validity
  • Filing with Clerk: Once finalized, the bill must be filed with the trial court clerk to become part of the appellate record.

Failure to comply with these steps may result in the appellate court refusing to consider the alleged error.

Judgment

Judgment can still be made on the defendant, except in some specific cases. Exceptions in criminal cases can be made in some states where there are statutory provisions made. The bill of exceptions has to be filed before the jury decides the verdict on the case. The bill is then noted and settled after the jury's decision is made. The judge can seal the bill of exceptions after he or she is out of office or once the record has been taken off by a writ of error.

The judge of the case has to sign the bill of exception. Once the bill of exception is sealed, the issue between the two parties ends as well. Evidence for the parties is in the bill of exceptions. Details that don't appear on the bill, such as exceptions and objections, can be tried.

Common Challenges in Preparing a Bill of Exception

Drafting an effective bill of exception involves several challenges:

  1. Accuracy and Clarity: The bill must clearly and accurately describe the legal issue being challenged without ambiguity.
  2. Judicial Disagreement: If the trial judge disputes the accuracy of the bill, it may delay or prevent certification.
  3. Procedural Traps: Missing deadlines, failing to properly serve the opposing party, or omitting key facts can render the bill invalid.
  4. Limited Usefulness: If the objection was not properly raised during trial, a bill of exception will not cure that waiver.

Due to these complications, legal guidance is often essential when preparing a bill of exception for appeal.

Modern Alternatives and Jurisdictional Differences

Many jurisdictions have replaced the formal bill of exception with simplified rules that automatically preserve objections for appeal, provided they are timely raised and included in the transcript. For example:

  • Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no longer require a separate bill if the objection is stated on the record.
  • Some states still maintain the bill of exception for specific instances, particularly where a transcript is incomplete or contested.
  • Other jurisdictions rely solely on motions for new trial or post-trial motions to raise alleged trial errors.

Litigants should consult local court rules to determine whether a bill of exception is required or if a more streamlined appellate procedure is available.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is a bill of exception?
    A bill of exception is a formal legal statement used to preserve an objection made during trial for review on appeal, especially when the objection isn't part of the official record.
  2. When must a bill of exception be filed?
    It typically must be filed before final judgment or within a court-specified timeframe. Delays can result in waiver of the objection.
  3. Is a bill of exception used in criminal cases?
    Yes, in some jurisdictions, though it's more commonly used in civil cases. Its use in criminal matters is often governed by specific statutes.
  4. What happens if the judge refuses to sign the bill?
    If a judge refuses to sign, appellate remedies may still exist, such as requesting the court reporter's transcript or using affidavits from witnesses to verify the objection.
  5. Do all jurisdictions still use bills of exception?
    No. Many states and the federal system have replaced them with modern appellate procedures that automatically preserve properly raised objections.

If you need help with a bill of exceptions, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.